Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Kevlar Timing Belt - Worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2010, 06:50 PM
  #91  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rock
His timing belt tensioner seized up, and somehow the belt was strong enough to keep the tensioner moving. When we took the tensioner off it was hard as a rock :.
My tensioner fell apart and bend the valves. Belt came off as good as new. no damage at all.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:04 PM
  #92  
elargentino
Banned
 
elargentino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: comeback trail
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
My tensioner fell apart and bend the valves. Belt came off as good as new. no damage at all.

OT - I never liked the auto tensioner.
I have smashed them on the floor in front of 944 owners before, and I give them an early one - (a few Rennlisters, in fact).
Just don't like them, my opinion.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:22 PM
  #93  
CPR
Race Director
 
CPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorktown, Virginia
Posts: 11,218
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
By the way, ferraris that love to spin over 7500rpm use interference engines and belts since 1974, and usualy WAY longer belts than 944 belt is. (Yes, belts made with 1970 technology)
Ferrari's?

They don't have to worry about belts as their maintenance schedule is a complete engine overhaul every 15,000 miles....
Old 10-28-2010, 07:28 PM
  #94  
elargentino
Banned
 
elargentino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: comeback trail
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CPR
Ferrari's?

They don't have to worry about belts as their maintenance schedule is a complete engine overhaul every 15,000 miles....
This is not only funny, but it is a good point.
Ferrari owneres are not 18 year old kids who neglect maintenance standards and drag down the average - as many 951 owners are (don't shoot the messenger)
Even a guy with a 308 will probably be a 30 something year old proffessional who is a very scared trader, when it comes to that engine.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:34 PM
  #95  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CPR
Ferrari's?

They don't have to worry about belts as their maintenance schedule is a complete engine overhaul every 15,000 miles....
This is myth.

30.000 mile service quotes: Timing belt inspected or replaced at 3-5 years.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:43 PM
  #96  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elargentino
18 year old kids who neglect maintenance standards and drag down the average - as many 951 owners are.
Many owners in US.

In europe 951 is no ferrari, but I've never seen 18 year old 951 owner. (or 944 for that mater)

I am 100 miles away from germany and 951s are very rare here. Even 944s are rare.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:45 PM
  #97  
Naplesguy06
Racer
 
Naplesguy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Too bad NASA hasnt advanced in 30 years,we just retired our only manned orbiter and out aircraft are no longer supersonic in commercial flight,I think the contrapositive applies here,unless you can prove that materials have actually advanced in the last 30 years and new atomic particles have ben discovered and applied to timing belts for tensile strength and elasticity then its a moot point.Just because kevlar stops a bullet in compression does not mean it is better in tension,usually the opposites apply here. Being that I am a P.E and work with labarotory ASTM testing regularly for 30 years plus I have never seen data that proved kevlar is superior in timing belts. Porsche, however, did test thier belts and they still do because they have to back the warranties up to 5 years and 50k miles,some cases longer if they thought for a second that the tried and trued belt would fail they would develop a replacement for it,,they are the factory.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:54 PM
  #98  
elargentino
Banned
 
elargentino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: comeback trail
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Many owners in US.

In europe 951 is no ferrari, but I've never seen 18 year old 951 owner. (or 944 for that mater)

I am 100 miles away from germany and 951s are very rare here. Even 944s are rare.
Of course I understand this, but you prove my point.
I am talking about law of averages here.
Old 10-28-2010, 07:58 PM
  #99  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Besides, if they made 944 nowdays they would use regular belt like all car manufacturers for the same reason they make porsches from steel just like they did in the 80s. And everybody knows that carbon fibre is better material.
Carbon fiber may be unfeasible for Boxsters, Caymans, Cayennes, Panameras, even most 911s...but aluminum isn't. I've been wondering lately why they don't use it extensively. Porsche has done an admirable job of keeping the weight down, RWD 911s are still in the 3000-ish pound range...but they could be a lot lighter using aluminum unibody structures and body panels. Audi's been using aluminum structures in mass-produced cars for years, why is Porsche lagging behind on this??
Old 10-28-2010, 07:58 PM
  #100  
Naplesguy06
Racer
 
Naplesguy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

now were going to get into standard deviations right?
Old 10-28-2010, 08:14 PM
  #101  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDS968
Carbon fiber may be unfeasible for Boxsters, Caymans, Cayennes, Panameras, even most 911s...but aluminum isn't. I've been wondering lately why they don't use it extensively. Porsche has done an admirable job of keeping the weight down, RWD 911s are still in the 3000-ish pound range...but they could be a lot lighter using aluminum unibody structures and body panels. Audi's been using aluminum structures in mass-produced cars for years, why is Porsche lagging behind on this??
Aluminum chasy is not as rigid as steel since aluminum is soft. Good material for junk like audi, but not good enough for porsche obviously.

I wonder why they dont produce cars like this anymore:



It is after all 20 years old car that is almost as fast as fastest car on planet 20 years later.
Old 10-28-2010, 08:44 PM
  #102  
elargentino
Banned
 
elargentino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: comeback trail
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Aluminum chasy is not as rigid as steel since aluminum is soft. Good material for junk like audi, but not good enough for porsche obviously.

I wonder why they dont produce cars like this anymore:



It is after all 20 years old car that is almost as fast as fastest car on planet 20 years later.
With simple thickness and engineering, obviously the Audi sub-frames can be the same, or better (if budget allows).
But I don't understand the relevance of the Porsche in your post....you are a very cryptic guy.
Old 10-28-2010, 09:21 PM
  #103  
teamcrossworks
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
teamcrossworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The object of this post was to gather information and opinions so that I and others interested could decide if Kevlar was worth the extra money when it came time to change our timing belts.

I have made my decision (stated it) and because of this thread I feel others can too .

IMHO we are now beating a dead horse to death and then some.


Old 10-28-2010, 09:24 PM
  #104  
teamcrossworks
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
teamcrossworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you guys think?









Old 10-28-2010, 10:00 PM
  #105  
F18Rep
Three Wheelin'
 
F18Rep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What do you guys think?
Now THAT was funny.

Here's a link to the 928 (read mucho aluminum) board where this was discussed about a month ago. Less drama and less entertaining maybe, but still informative. Some of the guys that contributed to that thread are big time gurus. They challenge a lot of things before accepting them and I think if you give them some time, you might respect what they have to say. Or not...Bruce

PS...Kempf is a twist method tensioning tool.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/594383-kempf-setting-new-gates-belt-on-s4.html?highlight=gates"]Link


Quick Reply: Kevlar Timing Belt - Worth it?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:01 AM.