Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

330 RWHP, component choices?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2010, 05:14 PM
  #61  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Well its a hybrid - K26/8 turbine wheel, in a machined #6 housing.
So half /6 and half /8 - I would say that could be arguably be called a /7.
No it's not.

It's a K27/6 with a clipped compressor wheel.

This was sold by Powerhaus (David Rein) as a "light weight" fast spool option.


TonyG
Old 05-13-2010, 05:16 PM
  #62  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fast951
The K27 DR (is for David Rain??).. It's a K26/6 hot side, with a reworked turbine wheel. Amazing, how long ago this stuff is, that's early/mid 90s era!
Are current turbo internals fully ceramic? or would that actually be heavier than titanium?

Could CF ever be used or too much heat?
Old 05-13-2010, 05:18 PM
  #63  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dea_944t
Do you consider the KKK/Garrett hybrids as more modern or are you thinking of Garrett GT series?

/Dea
Just a note on all the "more modern..." comments.

What's more modern about a new compressor? Nothing.

It's just a different compressor, producing a different compressor map. These new maps might be better suited to a particular engine setup or not.

There have been no big "break throughs" on compressor design.

The key now, which has always been the key, is to properly size a turbo.



TonyG
Old 05-13-2010, 06:02 PM
  #64  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
Are current turbo internals fully ceramic? or would that actually be heavier than titanium?

Could CF ever be used or too much heat?
Some turbos use Ceramic BB. At one time, someone used Ceramic wheels, not sure if it's available. Not familiar with anyone using TI.

Use CF on what? The turbo itself?
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 05-13-2010, 10:27 PM
  #65  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
Just a note on all the "more modern..." comments.

What's more modern about a new compressor? Nothing.

It's just a different compressor, producing a different compressor map. These new maps might be better suited to a particular engine setup or not.

There have been no big "break throughs" on compressor design.

The key now, which has always been the key, is to properly size a turbo.



TonyG
They come in different colors now.....
Old 05-13-2010, 10:44 PM
  #66  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
No it's not.

It's a K27/6 with a clipped compressor wheel.

This was sold by Powerhaus (David Rein) as a "light weight" fast spool option.


TonyG
:Rolleyes:

Yes it is - I ran one for years, have taken it apart and measured it.
Turbine housing is #6, and wheel is a #8.
In fact, to convert to my current K27/8 all I did was remove the machined #6 housing and instead use #8 turbine housing.
Old 05-14-2010, 12:39 AM
  #67  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
:Rolleyes:

Yes it is - I ran one for years, have taken it apart and measured it.
Turbine housing is #6, and wheel is a #8.
In fact, to convert to my current K27/8 all I did was remove the machined #6 housing and instead use #8 turbine housing.


Hmmm,
this is interesting
As I understand it the # 6 housing stands for 6 cm (squared). So, if they machined the #6 housing to fit the bigger wheel wouldn't the exhaust discharge area (the orignal 6 squared cm) have to be slightly enlarged? Another words it would have to be cut back to a larger section of the cone to fit the bigger wheel?
Old 05-14-2010, 01:49 AM
  #68  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTommy
Hmmm,
this is interesting
As I understand it the # 6 housing stands for 6 cm (squared). So, if they machined the #6 housing to fit the bigger wheel wouldn't the exhaust discharge area (the orignal 6 squared cm) have to be slightly enlarged? Another words it would have to be cut back to a larger section of the cone to fit the bigger wheel?
Probably, though I doubt the difference in cm^2 is significant.
Old 05-14-2010, 02:37 AM
  #69  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its area :radius ratio so when you machine it out for bigger wheel the radius from the turbine spindle changes also so it effects it in 2 ways . any way what ever difference will be far overshadowed by the change in wheel
Old 05-14-2010, 02:42 AM
  #70  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Dea_944t
After some years of chassis upgrades I'm thinking of doing something about the engine. The car is a 951 -90 and is more or less only used as a track-day car.

Plan is to reach 320-330 rwhp with upgrades below, but I need some feedback on if it will work and on the component choices.

- #55 injectors (already in place)
- MAF-kit (Tomas J version)
- Larger turbo, not sure what to choose?
- 100 cpi cat and single muffler system (already in place)
- Dbilas sport camshaft 280/114 11.7mm ex/in lift (or road version 272/112 12.0mm ex/in lift)
- New wastegate or modified original?

The big question is the turbo choice. It needs to be bolt-on and better spool-up would be welcome. I don't think I'll go for ball-bearing, I find it hard to justify the extra cost.
I'm thinking of the normal Garrett/KKK hybrid like this one: http://www.speedforceracing.com/index.php?productID=746 but I 've I also heard people using a K27 with #6 exhaust with good results?

What other options are there in similar price range?

I'm a little unsure on the cam. There are opinions that a new cam isn't needed as long as you stay below 400hp but my experiance from other engines is that a better cam makes quite a difference. The Dbilas sport cam is a little strange in that the intake lift is actually a bit lower than original 11,7mm vs 12mm.

Feedback?

/Dea
Your thread has gotten a good bit off track. You should look at your modifications as an overall system, rather than what you can randomly bolt on to get XXX number.
Vitesse and LR can both provide you with kits that will do far more than you want, and at reasonble boost levels, with the ability to access more power if you want to do so. Pick one and move on.
Old 05-14-2010, 09:13 PM
  #71  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
:Rolleyes:

Yes it is - I ran one for years, have taken it apart and measured it.
Turbine housing is #6, and wheel is a #8.
In fact, to convert to my current K27/8 all I did was remove the machined #6 housing and instead use #8 turbine housing.

But you didn't use the turbine larger wheel?

Are you saying that the two turbine wheels are the same? (the #6 wheel is not smaller than the #8 wheel....)

In any case.... it's very well documented that the difference, with respect to spool time with a #6 turbine and #8 turbine are about 500 rpms apples-to-apples.

Your dyno is not representative any of the K26/6 or K27/6 dyno's I've ever seen (and I've seen and dynoed a crap load of them over the years).... thus my comment.

TonyG
Old 05-14-2010, 09:27 PM
  #72  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Huh? The #8 wheel is larger then the #6 wheel.
The DR uses the larger #8 turbine wheel. And machined #6 housing.
When I converted the turbo, all I used was the #8 housing, as the turbo already used the #8 wheel. Thus a full K27/8.


-Rogue
Old 05-14-2010, 09:40 PM
  #73  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Huh? The #8 wheel is larger then the #6 wheel.
The DR uses the larger #8 turbine wheel. And machined #6 housing.
When I converted the turbo, all I used was the #8 housing, as the turbo already used the #8 wheel. Thus a full K27/8.
-Rogue
That would infer that the the "quick spool" was attributed to the a/r ratio of the turbine housing rather than the inducer/exducer dimensions. I've never measured those.

Years ago when I took them apart, the only difference I saw between the regular K27/6 and the K27/6 DR was a clipped compressor wheel.

I never compared the turbines of the K27/6 & K27/6 DR but they looked the same visually.

TonyG
Old 05-14-2010, 09:57 PM
  #74  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I will try to dig up the pictures, but I 100% guarantee that the DR uses the #8 turbine wheel in a #6 housing.

From PH website:
PH K-27-DR Turbo Conversion: A special quick-spool version of our K-27 that combines the top-end power of the #8 turbine with the low rpm responsiveness of the smaller #6 turbine. Ideal for drivers seeking the most performance from their 944 Turbo. A PowerHaus Exclusive
They were trying to make a turbo with the best of both worlds, and did so by using the combo I mentioned. And yes the 'quick-spool' was/is a result of the tighter turbine housing.
Old 05-14-2010, 10:01 PM
  #75  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
I will try to dig up the pictures, but I 100% guarantee that the DR uses the #8 turbine wheel in a #6 housing.

From PH website:


They were trying to make a turbo with the best of both worlds, and did so by using the combo I mentioned.

Cool...

BTW... I did the Powerhaus site years ago (or rather cleaned it up from what it was). It's been like it is for like 6-7 years. Looks very dated now. Not sure it's been updated since then!

TonyG


Quick Reply: 330 RWHP, component choices?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:56 PM.