Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Most power out of a built 951?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Most power out of a built 951?

I did some searches and found some info... my question is this,

If someone wanted to build a 2V 951 and mod everything, ported head, intake, cam, exhaust, tune, turbo, internals, race gas, SOME WHAT steetable ect ect how much power could you make (ball park)?

I have seen a bunch of 500hp cars out there but most are pump gas cars and look like they still have some left in them.

Thanks.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:06 PM
  #2  
944obscene
Three Wheelin'
 
944obscene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Special Tool, I think still holds the record for one of the highest powered 951's and he's still running a 2.5 IIRC. Think he laid down 602 on the dyno.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:08 PM
  #3  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW!
Old 08-09-2009, 07:10 PM
  #4  
dillon410021
Race Car
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I think 500 hp is about as good as you will get for it to be reliable. Yet people like special tool made over 600 hp.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:16 PM
  #5  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as I can take it to church and hit some local Saturday cruise in's and am not breaking every night I am happy.


My last car was an 83 Z/28 with a BBC on nitrous making about 800hp and was so loud that it gave you a head ache and I loved it. My father has an 81 931 and he pretty much said it was nuts haha.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:30 PM
  #6  
dillon410021
Race Car
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

if you are planning on making power, the 3.0L is the way to go. Also, you need to decide if your want a SOHC 8 valve or a dohc 16 valve head
Old 08-09-2009, 07:36 PM
  #7  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I am seeing putting a 16V head on a 2V motor is not really worth it. If I rememebr right the Turbo S has the 3.0????

A DOHC 16V turbo motor would be cool but the headaches.... haha.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:43 PM
  #8  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3.0 liters blocks are more stout.. what you should start with.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:49 PM
  #9  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Wrench Monkey
From what I am seeing putting a 16V head on a 2V motor is not really worth it. If I rememebr right the Turbo S has the 3.0????

A DOHC 16V turbo motor would be cool but the headaches.... haha.
Even the most mild 16v head outflows the big dollar 8v heads.
Old 08-09-2009, 07:56 PM
  #10  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So buy a DOHC 3.0 motor and put some work into it and swap the turbo parts over? I figured they would flow a lot more..... just looking at any 2V head compared to a 4V head would tell someone that.

Most of my brains is with the 931 stuff so I am still trying to learn all the engine combo's....
Old 08-09-2009, 08:03 PM
  #11  
944obscene
Three Wheelin'
 
944obscene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2.5, 2.7, 2.8, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2
Old 08-09-2009, 08:04 PM
  #12  
dillon410021
Race Car
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

It is power vs. reliability. It is hard to have both at a high hp level
Old 08-09-2009, 08:09 PM
  #13  
Wrench Monkey
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
Wrench Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dillon410021
It is power vs. reliability. It is hard to have both at a high hp level
Reliability to me is not breaking after a quick Saturday cruise.... If I am lucky I put 100-200 miles a year on my fun stuff haha..
Old 08-09-2009, 09:09 PM
  #14  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wrench Monkey
So buy a DOHC 3.0 motor and put some work into it and swap the turbo parts over? I figured they would flow a lot more..... just looking at any 2V head compared to a 4V head would tell someone that.

Most of my brains is with the 931 stuff so I am still trying to learn all the engine combo's....

All 944 turbo's were 2.5 liter motors, including the S versions.

At the risk of over-simplifying, there were two basic blocks for the 944/968 series, and two basic cranks.

The original n/a and turbo blocks had 100mm bores with an open top design.

Starting in 89, Porsche came out with a new block with 104mm bores. The cylinders are attached to each other in these blocks and the water jackets are shallower, making the cylinders less likely to move and cause head gasket leaks. Later versions of these blocks had piston squirters, which are nice to have. Compare pictures below to see how the 100mm blocks have separate cylinders, whereas the cylinders in the 104mm blocks are connected.

The original n/a and turbo crank had a stoke of 78.9mm, where as the later cranks had a stroke of 88mm. All 944 turbo's had 100mm bores and 78.9mm stroke, for 2479cc total.

With the right pistons, the bores and cranks can be mixed and matched to make the following:

100mm x 78.9mm = 2479cc (e.g., original 944 and turbo)
100mm x 88mm = 2765cc (e.g., Andial 944 turbo stroker)
104mm x 78.9mm = 2681cc (e.g., 1989 944 "2.7" motor)
104mm x 88mm = 2990cc (e.g., 944S2, 968)

Aftermarket builders can sleeve these motors also, with 106mm bores (or bigger), which can get you up to 3106cc with an 88mm crank. There are also a few "stroked" cranks out there beyond 88mm, for really big motors...
Attached Images   

Last edited by Tom M'Guinn; 08-09-2009 at 09:42 PM.
Old 08-09-2009, 09:17 PM
  #15  
d993
Racer
 
d993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorax
Even the most mild 16v head outflows the big dollar 8v heads.
Exactly, so less boost is required to get more power.
Turbo sizing is also important, and make sure it's a good reliable turbo, not some cheap knock-off like some that are sold as 944T upgrade kits which fail after a few hundred miles.


Quick Reply: Most power out of a built 951?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:01 AM.