E-85 MEGA THREAD
#167
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
hows the work on that FQS mod coming?
oh, and should afr be richened when approaching the torque peak or when boost is starting to come on? i need to know since basically i will be hitting max boost almost off idle, but with the NA cam the torque peak is about 3000.
oh, and should afr be richened when approaching the torque peak or when boost is starting to come on? i need to know since basically i will be hitting max boost almost off idle, but with the NA cam the torque peak is about 3000.
#173
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Adam, from what I've seen my EGTs are usually 50degrees F or so lower then when running gas.
Spencer, in TunerPro, click on the tools->preferences then click on the 'reverse rows' checkbox.
That will make your table a little easier to read.
Spencer, in TunerPro, click on the tools->preferences then click on the 'reverse rows' checkbox.
That will make your table a little easier to read.
#174
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With your setup, anytime you are in the WOT table, you can pretty much assume full boost, except really low RPM...
In the WOT table, I would use:
480 to 1000 : 12.8
1280 : 12.5
1600 : 12.0
2000 : 11.5
2480 : 11.0
Looks good from there, except for 6240. Keep that at 11.5, just like the 6000rpm cell.
Remember, better to be a little safe and start rich. Especially with E85, as power doesn't nose-dive like gas when rich.
In the WOT table, I would use:
480 to 1000 : 12.8
1280 : 12.5
1600 : 12.0
2000 : 11.5
2480 : 11.0
Looks good from there, except for 6240. Keep that at 11.5, just like the 6000rpm cell.
Remember, better to be a little safe and start rich. Especially with E85, as power doesn't nose-dive like gas when rich.
#175
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
flipped it over and made the WOT changes.
hows part throttle look to you? as i get to 40%+ throttle im starting to enrich it because the vacuum bypass valve will be ready to open a bit and air will go through the blower. under 40% or so it will be just basically cruising
hows part throttle look to you? as i get to 40%+ throttle im starting to enrich it because the vacuum bypass valve will be ready to open a bit and air will go through the blower. under 40% or so it will be just basically cruising
#176
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looking good - one more change for the WOT table, I you want a bit smoother transition from one cell to the next. So in the 5520 cell, I would have 11.3 or so.
Remember the axis for the PT table is 'load'. Basically airflow / rpm. (I'm working on a better representation in TunerPro)
Again, you don't want significant changes between adjacent cells. Using the 3-D visual is great for identifying peaks and holes. Also, why so rich down at the lower-left? I would make those cells the same as the 960 row.
Remember the axis for the PT table is 'load'. Basically airflow / rpm. (I'm working on a better representation in TunerPro)
Again, you don't want significant changes between adjacent cells. Using the 3-D visual is great for identifying peaks and holes. Also, why so rich down at the lower-left? I would make those cells the same as the 960 row.
#177
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looking good - one more change for the WOT table, I you want a bit smoother transition from one cell to the next. So in the 5520 cell, I would have 11.3 or so.
Remember the axis for the PT table is 'load'. Basically airflow / rpm. (I'm working on a better representation in TunerPro)
Again, you don't want significant changes between adjacent cells. Using the 3-D visual is great for identifying peaks and holes. Also, why so rich down at the lower-left? I would make those cells the same as the 960 row.
Remember the axis for the PT table is 'load'. Basically airflow / rpm. (I'm working on a better representation in TunerPro)
Again, you don't want significant changes between adjacent cells. Using the 3-D visual is great for identifying peaks and holes. Also, why so rich down at the lower-left? I would make those cells the same as the 960 row.