Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Corleones new engine is running

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:04 PM
  #271  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And I don't understand why Corleone's car is 8v not 16
Old 08-22-2010, 03:35 PM
  #272  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Yes, a long post from you, but don't stop. I appreciate your logic and openness about this. I have been running at target 0.78 so perhaps too rich.

Interesting considering your higher c/r too. I would think you would see some knock but I guess not? So you must have developed this idea over time and testing. I remember you doing many maps. Was your boost and/or ign too high in the past?
Yes, you run much to rich.

E85 likes higher CR. I have had a lot of help from my engine friend who develops racing engines and dyno all day. They run 11:1 with 4 valve heads, again its all about hardware and timing. With a bit higher CR you have more basic power, better and earlier spoolup, cooler exhaust and so on. Isnt it a faster car we want with a good driveability...

I have started with gas and logged a lot of maps, checked and listened to knocks with Link knock amplifier, then when I had a proper gas ignition map i changed to E85 and rise ignition between 0-12 degrees depending on revs. From there it will always be some tuning anyway but you know whats pretty safe.
Old 08-22-2010, 03:42 PM
  #273  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mark944na86
I was reading elsewhere that the valve/spark plug configuration of the 16V head made it inherently less susceptible to detonation than the 8V heads, so (if true) that should allow for an increased CR all other things being equal.

This is why I was little surprised to see Sean had chosen a 8:1 CR for his 16V 3.0L build...
A 16 V is a lot better to prevent knocks and you can run even more CR without the problem.

Many of you still talk about knocks, you can all stop with that if we talk E85, thats not the problem. The big problem is paek cylinderpressure and that what kills the engine often before a knock. A knock with E85 will be just one big knock and then its over, yes you can have some single at very high revs but the difference to gas is that a gas knock is a lot small knocks as the gas/air burns in smaller parts, E85 when it knocks the hole mixture is knockin at one time, I promise you will notice...
Old 08-22-2010, 03:45 PM
  #274  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
And I don't understand why Corleone's car is 8v not 16
Neither do I but the explanation is that I had my 2.5 l before and already had the SFR st2 headers and a head with a lot of work.

A 16 V will produce about 80 more hp if the set up is simular to mine, about 750 hp. I really dont know if the block will handle that without major improvement.
Old 08-22-2010, 03:49 PM
  #275  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Here is 2 pics about the cooling.
Attached Images   
Old 08-22-2010, 04:02 PM
  #276  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Pics got huge...

First you can se the second tanks connection to the pipe along the head

Second is the venturilike inlet from the head stem hoses
Old 08-22-2010, 10:14 PM
  #277  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what tires.. I couldn't get any type of street tire to stick through 3rd gear. Only top of 3rd held with street tires... 255\'s . Love the sound, but surprised its so quiet.
Old 08-22-2010, 10:40 PM
  #278  
sebastian944
Rennlist Member
 
sebastian944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i want to book my next vacation to Sweden just to see this car.
Old 08-22-2010, 11:08 PM
  #279  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

80% more thats pretty extream i would think perhaps 80% easier ...your friends running 11:1 are they around 17 to 20 psi ?? I kind of feel that i have chickened out a bit as i have put a few more cc in the bowl of my 968 piston's as i was up near 11.3:1 i think i will still be above 10.5 so its still pretty manly ..
Old 08-23-2010, 02:48 AM
  #280  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
80% more thats pretty extream i would think perhaps 80% easier ...your friends running 11:1 are they around 17 to 20 psi ?? I kind of feel that i have chickened out a bit as i have put a few more cc in the bowl of my 968 piston's as i was up near 11.3:1 i think i will still be above 10.5 so its still pretty manly ..
BMW boost is 35 psi!
Old 08-23-2010, 02:53 AM
  #281  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 95ONE
what tires.. I couldn't get any type of street tire to stick through 3rd gear. Only top of 3rd held with street tires... 255\'s . Love the sound, but surprised its so quiet.
I have Kumho R-tyres, 285 at the back and 265 at the front. I have no big torque peaks and that is whats cause wheelspinn especially if you have a very fast boost buildup. Every wheelspinn makes the car slower...

I have one big silencer at the back and the cat is sittingjust before the rear axle. Separat 2" wg pipe all the way
Old 08-23-2010, 05:14 AM
  #282  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Corleone
Yes, you run much to rich.

E85 likes higher CR. I have had a lot of help from my engine friend who develops racing engines and dyno all day. They run 11:1 with 4 valve heads, again its all about hardware and timing. With a bit higher CR you have more basic power, better and earlier spoolup, cooler exhaust and so on. Isnt it a faster car we want with a good driveability...

I have started with gas and logged a lot of maps, checked and listened to knocks with Link knock amplifier, then when I had a proper gas ignition map i changed to E85 and rise ignition between 0-12 degrees depending on revs. From there it will always be some tuning anyway but you know whats pretty safe.
What stoich / afr did you run with pump fuel and what was that octane?
I am running stock 8:0.1 pistons and stock head on this little 2.5L build and have been running to low 11's afr for some time. From memory the car does feel more alive when it's running leaner. On the track though I like to err on the side of caution for extended loads.
Old 08-23-2010, 04:24 PM
  #283  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
What stoich / afr did you run with pump fuel and what was that octane?
I am running stock 8:0.1 pistons and stock head on this little 2.5L build and have been running to low 11's afr for some time. From memory the car does feel more alive when it's running leaner. On the track though I like to err on the side of caution for extended loads.
With 98 octan pump fuel, same as yours 93 I did run not lower than Afr 12.5. Its a big difference to drive between low 11 and 12.5...! If you want to be a bit more safe you can just lower to 12 just before/on/after max torque and then lean out with higher revs.
Old 08-23-2010, 06:19 PM
  #284  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Actually our 98 is probably the same as yours give or take. We're not on U.S. standards down here. You definitely run leaner than most here would suggest. Did you see much knock or pre ign on pump at those afrs?
Old 08-24-2010, 02:05 PM
  #285  
Corleone
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Actually our 98 is probably the same as yours give or take. We're not on U.S. standards down here. You definitely run leaner than most here would suggest. Did you see much knock or pre ign on pump at those afrs?
Ok, no, no knocks at all and no pre ignitions. Risk for pre ignitions will lower when you rise ignition as the spark is coming earlier. Its very important to have a very powerfull ignition, something many seems to forget. The spark should be very powerfull in its energy and burn a long time. That will give you a shorter mixture burning time.

My MSD works very well and I think this is a good insurance to start with if you looking for high power.

Over and out.


Quick Reply: Corleones new engine is running



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:49 PM.