Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Intercooler up grade made by Autobahn Garage in NW Ohio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2006, 01:31 AM
  #31  
Cliff Ruckstuhl
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Cliff Ruckstuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: I live in Findlay Ohio
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So ther is really only one way to say if this is worth it is to hit the Dyno? Number's wont lie

WOlf PAck 88 951
Old 02-17-2006, 01:42 AM
  #32  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default



Old 02-17-2006, 01:43 AM
  #33  
951North
Pro
 
951North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Scotland
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Wolf Pack
So ther is really only one way to say if this is worth it is to hit the Dyno? Number's wont lie

WOlf PAck 88 951

Precisely, back to back and then look at the numbers...

and I don't think more flow = more power...

more flow at same pressure (not boost but IC outlet pressure) = more air AND when combined with more fuel = more power...

j.
Old 02-17-2006, 01:48 AM
  #34  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,503
Received 515 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

I personally put more stock in the Porsche engineers than a "tooner".
Old 02-17-2006, 03:24 AM
  #35  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Was it flow tested Olli
We have not flow tested it. The only thing we have noticed is a temperature drop with this modified cooler. I have a modified and non modified coolers available. I suppose i will do some dyno tests while tuning up my MAP kit, then i have a possibilty to test both coolers. Unfortunately this will happen next summer, so it will take a little time.
Old 02-17-2006, 09:03 AM
  #36  
kasturbo
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kasturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Grove City, OH
Posts: 3,526
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by T Tanner
In time I plan to do a dyno run side by side and post the results
Tad, if you have access to a dyno, I'll volunteer to be a test dummy. If the thing makes more power, you'll get my money. I need a couple weeks to finish up my beast and then I'll be ready.
Old 02-17-2006, 03:55 PM
  #37  
Cliff Ruckstuhl
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Cliff Ruckstuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: I live in Findlay Ohio
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard all the thoughts on doing the mod to the IC some say no and yet we have vendors selling the mod advertising with one vendor showing a 18% increase in flow. To me it looks like the right thing to do. So I am asking, why did Porsche design the 951 IC with what looks like a air choking end cap? From what I have read and seen on the Renn List with the people racing the car is most if not all have installed larger IC. If we install a larger IC are we not also increasing the flow and the cooling surface? Looking at the IC today it looks like to me that air will follow the least path of resistance and looking at the front of the input end cap it looks to me like the air going in will not even make it to the front side of the IC. I could see that it would look like one could slice a wedge out of the IC starting at the front side of the IC where the end caps meets up with the core. I am having trouble seeing where much air is being feed into the leading edge of the IC because where the end cap is connected to the Core ther is just not hardly any open space between the core and the end cap. Wouldnt the leading edge of the IC be the best place for air to flow where it would be getting the most out of what an IC does?

If you know the answers please show me the light on how the Porsche design is better? If changing the end cap is wrong then why is the Porsche end cap so right???

Wolf Pack 88 951

Last edited by Cliff Ruckstuhl; 02-17-2006 at 05:00 PM.
Old 02-17-2006, 04:01 PM
  #38  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,503
Received 515 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Not to be mean, but that's pure conjecture. Until it's put on a flowbench and a dyno, it's all BS.
Old 02-17-2006, 06:18 PM
  #39  
lleroyb
Burning Brakes
 
lleroyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the majority of the air is moving through the front, the outside air cooling the aft tubes would be seeing warmer air. It looks to me like Porsche was trying to achieve and even and minimum temperature at the outlet end of the combustion air, at the expense of some pressure drop. As someone said, it is the temperature of the air that is important (and guards against detonation). Need it to breathe better? Turn up the boost. Increased flow accross the outside of the intercooler should be the goal of a modification of the intercooler or nose panel. That would yield more power and safety.

Lou
Old 02-17-2006, 06:22 PM
  #40  
lleroyb
Burning Brakes
 
lleroyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also, yet another variable. As ST posted, dyno's don't do an intercooled car justice. The portable fan does not produce the air flow of road speed. So a dyno run might not give a true comparison between two ICs.

Lou
Old 02-17-2006, 08:20 PM
  #41  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Wolf, Porsche designed the intercooler using very sound principles. Again, I suggest you read up on Bernoulli's theorum if you don't believe me. The limitations on the stock intercooler are based pretty much on size and surface area, not internal design. There ARE gains to be had by modifying the intercooler, but they are to be had by making the surface area bigger or by trying to reduce the ambient external temp (either by trying to direct more air through it or spraying it with a cooling agent), not by trying to increase the flow inside the existing one.

Did you notice that the narrow side of the intercooler has a slight curve to it? DO you think that they would bother engineering something like that into the product, at rather significant cost over just having a straight piece, if there were no benefit to it. Again, read up on flow dynamics if you don't want to believe me.

Regards,
Old 02-17-2006, 08:23 PM
  #42  
aeronautica86
Three Wheelin'
 
aeronautica86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as has been said before, this is worthless without back to back dyno pulls, which I am waiting on to make my judgement on the soundness of this mod



Quick Reply: Intercooler up grade made by Autobahn Garage in NW Ohio



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:31 PM.