Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

2.5 -> 2.8 conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2004, 04:20 PM
  #76  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Yep, don’t expect any ‘monster’ bore engines from the Darton MID kits. The cylinders aren’t as large an OD as the stock barrels.
The 3.0 block kit has been assembled and is currently being tested and the 2.5 kit is waiting for the sleeves to be manufactured and then test fitted (the test block was supplied by me!).
Interestingly enough the 3.0 sleeves may go down to 102 or 101.6mm ID, that way a 16v 2.6 liter GT3 legal engine would be possible.
Don’t hold your breath for the product, Darton is taking their time in testing before releasing the product.
One plus of this system is that once the block is machined to accept the sleeves a replacement sleeve can be “dropped” into place with no additional changes. This is very desirable for the racers out there – initial cost may be high but repair / refreshing the engine will not be too bad.

Chris White
Old 10-18-2004, 05:07 PM
  #77  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Can we hypthetical some numbers? 2000.00 dollars for your 4 cyls?

I'm assumuing that since the 944 is half a 928 engine (same bore spacing, deck height, etc, that the darton will work with the 928.

'Course, more boost with a nice deck plate from fst951 would do the same thing, and its probably cheaper.
Old 10-18-2004, 10:18 PM
  #78  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aaah Brendan, you're forgetting the benefit
of running totally wet sleeve under racing
& high boost conditions.
Old 10-19-2004, 05:57 PM
  #79  
TurboTim
Banned
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fast951
The bore size limits are what the guys at Darton informed me. Yes it will be a wet sleeve.. The limitation is due to the way the sleeve goes into the block.. I have not used this type of sleeves yet.. It appears that Tim at SFR is already working with Darton, so he might have more info to share. Oh yes, and it's not cheap...

Fast,


We are not working with Darton but we are using some of their off the shelve sleeves.It takes quite a bit of work to prepare them before they can be pressed into the block but at the momoent,if you want Darton sleeves there is not much of an alternative.
Old 10-19-2004, 06:12 PM
  #80  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
Fast,


We are not working with Darton but we are using some of their off the shelve sleeves.It takes quite a bit of work to prepare them before they can be pressed into the block but at the momoent,if you want Darton sleeves there is not much of an alternative.

Tim,

I know all about prepping the sleeves to work with the 944 block. I just completed a 2.8l big bore (wet sleeves).. lots and lots of work... I personally don't feel comfortable going over 104mm bore on a dry sleeve on the 944 block, which is why I went wet sleeves..
Your project sounds fun, keep us updated.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 12-26-2009, 06:05 PM
  #81  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I know this is an old thread but what's the diffreance between a dry sleeve and a wet sleeve?
Old 12-26-2009, 06:51 PM
  #82  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Hmmm….its like an archeology dig…!

The dry sleeves are sleeve that are installed inside the stock cylinder after the bore has been enlarged – the sleeves are not exposed to the coolant (hence the ‘dry’ sleeve)
Wet sleeves have the stock cylinder machined out and the new sleeves completely replace the stock cylinder – the ‘wet’ sleeve is exposed to the coolant.

If you want to see some pictures of wet sleeve machine go to http://www.944enhancement.com/html/e...machining.html
Old 12-26-2009, 11:13 PM
  #83  
odb812
Burning Brakes
 
odb812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
They built 16 cars for the street to homologate and 4 race cars. They artificially slowed them down as well. Mine is an exact replica using 80% of driveline parts from the orginal cars and 100% visual body mods. Only upgrades were done where there are better solutions than the factory.
Raj
Raj, are you bringing it to Hershey this year? (fingers crossed)
Old 12-26-2009, 11:50 PM
  #84  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ok that's what I thought. Looking through the old threads their was concern about the durability of big bore and stroked motors. What's the state of the art today for a big bore 2.8? And could a 2.8 still rev like a 2.5 , if the 2.8 had a lighter but bigger piston?



Quick Reply: 2.5 -> 2.8 conversion



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 AM.