Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

CL Redondo Beach: 95 GTS Auto, 16k miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2012, 11:25 PM
  #46  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
This car isn't museum quality, or worth much over $60k or so.

OTOH spending say $40k on a beater would not make it worth $60k even if it looked exactly like and performed exactly like a GTS, it would just be another $20k to $25k frankenporsche depending on the details.

What gives this car value is that it has low original miles, its a real GTS, and in nice original condition.
I'll probably get flamed for this but you have to realize that these cars are so old that $13,000 Scion's probably have more to them nowdays. It would be easy to make a better car (better looking, faster, better handling) than a GTS with all the newer, lighter technology that as been invented since 1995. A lot of people think that the 928's look like a strange space bubble and find them the least desirable of all Porsches.

For only 16k miles this car seems a little beat up with the way the hood is aligned and the condition of the interior.
Old 03-11-2012, 12:31 AM
  #47  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
A lot of people think that the 928's look like a strange space bubble and find them the least desirable of all Porsches.
A 'lot' of people of people feel this way about 944s, 914s, 986s as well. Personally, I feel that way about the whole 911 family because there are way too many of them out there.
Old 03-11-2012, 12:55 AM
  #48  
linderpat
Rennlist Member
 
linderpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 14,450
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,278 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
Funny stuff NoVector, maybe you missed your calling and should have a magazine?

I have some bias related to my opinions.

My point of view is as a buyer, not a seller.
I am on the sportscar side of the sportscar - luxury barge scale.
I prefer a display of frugality to a display of wealth.
I see no reason to keep the Grey Poupon cold. I use room temperature yellow mustard with a few table spoons of dry hot Chinese mustard mixed into the bottle.

I've never driven a GTS 5 spd, but I recall driving a Coupe DeVille once, can't be that much difference. Some of my older friends love their STS, so its not like I am knocking the GTS, just not for my taste.
Originally Posted by 944J
I'll probably get flamed for this but you have to realize that these cars are so old that $13,000 Scion's probably have more to them nowdays. It would be easy to make a better car (better looking, faster, better handling) than a GTS with all the newer, lighter technology that as been invented since 1995. A lot of people think that the 928's look like a strange space bubble and find them the least desirable of all Porsches.

For only 16k miles this car seems a little beat up with the way the hood is aligned and the condition of the interior.
honestly this just boggles my mind.
Old 03-12-2012, 12:41 PM
  #49  
SteveG
Rennlist Member
 
SteveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 6,513
Received 98 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
. . . .and modified there is no benefit to starting with a GTS.
Some might consider the rear flares an advantage when choosing rubber, even if you are referring to engine mods. I'll let someone else challenge you on that. Ease of modification is not why someone pays 95K or even more for a GTS. We're having fun here, right?
Old 03-12-2012, 02:53 PM
  #50  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

This thread is almost as funny as the one about Pelosi owning a 928. Keep up the good work.
Old 03-14-2012, 10:22 PM
  #51  
kevinlieb
Racer
 
kevinlieb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NorCal
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

944J you are a special kind of a-hole. I like that this board doesn't have flame-problems but I have to let you have it. This is like going to a Justin Bieber concert and yelling "you suck". Yes he might suck (in your opinion) but, wrong venue! Why would you bother in front of people you KNOW are going to hate you for it? You are just trying to get "beat up" so I am going to leave it at that.

Lets see if anyone is collecting Classic Scion's in 25 years...
Old 03-14-2012, 10:32 PM
  #52  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
This thread is almost as funny as the one about Pelosi owning a 928. Keep up the good work.
Yup, and thanks for your contribution.
Old 03-15-2012, 04:47 AM
  #53  
Charley B
Rennlist Member
 
Charley B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Patterson, Ca
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It is amazing how many members of this forum have learned to read this amaturish drivel and just shrug their shoulders, knowing any response is wasted when applied to vacuums residing mid cranium.
Old 03-15-2012, 05:08 AM
  #54  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The cheapest new Scion costs $16,000 not $13,000 and weighs only 2100lb. 0-60 is over 11 seconds and it struggles to maintain 60,ph. How could it possibly have more than a 3400lb GTS?!?
Old 03-15-2012, 05:29 AM
  #55  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
The cheapest new Scion costs $16,000 not $13,000 and weighs only 2100lb. 0-60 is over 11 seconds and it struggles to maintain 60,ph. How could it possibly have more than a 3400lb GTS?!?
Dunno. How did it get its own religion, Sciontology?
Old 03-15-2012, 02:34 PM
  #56  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Does that mean Tom Cruise drives a Scion?
Old 03-15-2012, 03:00 PM
  #57  
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Randy V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Insane Diego, California
Posts: 40,449
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Range Rover
I am by no means saying that GTS's are better than other 928's.
Except, they are.

Bow down to us mighty GTS owners!

Old 03-15-2012, 03:12 PM
  #58  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Charley B
It is amazing how many members of this forum have learned to read this amaturish drivel and just shrug their shoulders, knowing any response is wasted when applied to vacuums residing mid cranium.
I agree with regards to the Scion trolling; otherwise though, thanks for strengthening my point...
Old 03-15-2012, 03:16 PM
  #59  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Can you put a thread on ignore?
Old 03-15-2012, 05:06 PM
  #60  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928ntslow
dangleb..I agree with most all of what you had said, but I am not sure you are so accurate on a GTS being under powered. We all know they were factory de-tuned as they were being phased out and Porsche didn't want it to be faster than their best selling car at the time. However, not sure how much time you've spent behind the wheel of a 5 spd GTS. If you think it lacks performance, you are soaringly mistaken! I think you are listening to too many people that sway your thoughts. You just don't spend that kind of money to buy a nice GTS to improve performance, you enjoy it for what it is...whole different thought pattern. If you want to hot rod a 928, save your money and go for a less expensive model that you can sink money into if you feel like you have to something prove. It's this exact lack of thought that you bring which boasts ignorance over the issue of higher priced GTS's. One thing has NOTHING to do with the other.

Range Rover is right on.
Danglerb isn't wrong, he's just been "exposed" to a different "perspective".

After you've driven/ridden in a GTS with one of my 6.5 liter engines, the stock GTS is almost boring. Seems like you are driving an old VW bus, in comparision.

I think people that "modify" the GTS vehicle are just trying to bring it more up to the "current" performance of the "newer" vehicles....kind of like if Porsche was building that car today.


Quick Reply: CL Redondo Beach: 95 GTS Auto, 16k miles



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:59 PM.