Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

What company best at building Stroker engines from scratch?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2011 | 03:23 PM
  #196  
GregBBRD's Avatar
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 2,481
From: Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by terry gt
In a earlier post there was a discusion on piston - bore compatibility . Here is a failed wisco / iron plated / alusil stroker bore and piston . Devek supplyed .
Great example of something that did not work. Hopefully this experiment wasn't on your "nickel". Like I said, I've not seen any successful examples of any coated/plated pistons that actually work in the Alusil bores....except for the "factory pistons", although more have been tried than should have.

Seems like there have been many builders that have tried coatings and plating on Wiseco pistons, that hasn't worked. Phil Theshie followed closely in these footsteps and did "experiments" (with customer money....wait a minute....isn't there someone else doing this, right now?) with Wiseco pistons. I've redone a couple of these engines.....which ran for very short periods of time (minutes, not hours).

I believe that Devek also used "Chevy" offset connecting rods, which absolutely were incorrect and cause severe "thrusting" of the pistons into the cylinders. With the "Chevy" offset rod, even if the iron plating might have worked, the pistons never had a chance, due to the extreme pressures that the thrusting of the pistons placed on the cylinders. I worked very closely with the engineers at Carrrillo, who computer modeled the "Chevy" offset connecting rod inside a 928 engine. The forces transfered to the cylinder walls from this incorrect offset were staggering.

Luckily, the plating on the "factory pistons" is very well applied and sticks extrememly well to the pistons. These seem to be the only pistons that did survive with the "Chevy" offset problem, although the thrust force is very easy seen, when the pistons and rod bearings subjected to this abuse are examined.
Old 05-21-2011 | 03:27 PM
  #197  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Some of the pics are still up on a much earlier thread on that engine:

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...28-engine.html
Old 05-21-2011 | 03:27 PM
  #198  
SeanR's Avatar
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Likes: 503
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I believe that Devek also used "Chevy" offset connecting rods, which absolutely were incorrect and cause severe "thrusting" of the pistons into the cylinders. .
Was this something they did on all the built motors they made? Or just on the ones 6.4 and up? Or do ya know?

I know, lots of questions.
Old 05-21-2011 | 03:50 PM
  #199  
GregBBRD's Avatar
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 2,481
From: Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Was this something they did on all the built motors they made? Or just on the ones 6.4 and up? Or do ya know?

I know, lots of questions.
No idea. Marc was here...maybe he will answer this.

I don't think he should/would be "sensitive" to this issue...it's just part of engine development. If everything worked perfectly, the first attempt, "development" would need to be changed to "developed".

Marc will always be known as a major contributor to the 928 performance world.
Old 05-21-2011 | 07:11 PM
  #200  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

The bottom line to the question that the OP asked is pretty simple, if you want one that is pro built by some one that has built more than a couple, there really is only one choice.
Old 05-21-2011 | 10:11 PM
  #201  
Carl Fausett's Avatar
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 60
From: Horicon, WI
Default

That pretty much tells it all. Let Carl "experiment" with parts he's inventing, as he goes, or go to someone who's been building engines for years and already has developed the needed pieces.
No, no Greg - you have us confused. My experimental parts are not sold, offered, or ever installed on any one's car but my own. I would never install experimental bits onto a customer's engine - thats your deal.

Like the $3000 to $4000 "oil control kit" you just wrote about. Untested, first one ever built, and there it sits on a customer's car.

Not me, dude.
Old 05-21-2011 | 10:15 PM
  #202  
Carl Fausett's Avatar
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 60
From: Horicon, WI
Default

Z - I dont think Kelly-Moss wants to do any more 928 work from what I hear.

Yes, there a number of engine assemblers and a few builders around the globe who do/have done a good job. I ship valves and pistons overseas with some regularity and the builders over there install them and do a nice job. Very few have the $$ to have an complete engine shipped 'round the world, so this is a good solution for them.

Another name I expected to see mentioned and have not is Paul Anderson in the UK. Has a solid reputation, been around for years.
Old 05-21-2011 | 10:40 PM
  #203  
Carl Fausett's Avatar
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 60
From: Horicon, WI
Default

The bottom line to the question that the OP asked is pretty simple, if you want one that is pro built by some one that has built more than a couple, there really is only one choice.
Blown87, we are a supercharger kit builder. So naturally, most of the engines I am requested to build are prepared for boost, that is: sleeved. The question was: "how many stroker motors have you built" and I answered honestly. Had the question been "how many 928 engines have you built" the answer would have been different.

How many? Well, Greg is partially right, I did purchase all the crap left in the Phil Threshie warehouse. I was after the bare blocks, cranks, and unmolested heads and cams for cores. There was a lot of wild-eyed thinking at 928 Developments, and his plasma-welded camshaft experiments and Tri-Y header mess went right into the dumpster with a lot of similar useless bits.

But the bare engines, cranks, and heads that he hadn't messed up were allright, and thats what I was after.

All those engines are built and shipped, and just recently I was running very low on good cores. Last month I drove to Philly to grab a deal on bare blocks and heads from Mason's defunct business. Again, just to secure more cores at a good price for my customers.

Somebody in this thread added up an engine built by Greg and a similar engine built by us and figured Greg's was $40,000 and our's was $30,000. Maybe this is one of the reason's why.

Look - Greg HAS built more 928 engines than I have and I have said so. And I bet, as 928 engines is all he does and it is not all I do, that this trend will continue.

But to say something like "there is only 1 guy in the world who can do a good job of building a 928 motor" is just nuts. There are many.

And as you know, I like to think we offer a more complete selection of the ancillary bits you need for a High Performance build (the heads, cams, big valves, performance valve springs, head gaskets, pistons, intake manifold research (16v and 32v), oil control kits and scrapers, etc).

So I can't offer more years of experience than Greg. I know. So I offer a better price and more published R&D and engine performance products than he does.
Old 05-21-2011 | 10:52 PM
  #204  
jcorenman's Avatar
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,067
Likes: 323
From: Friday Harbor, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
No, no Greg - you have us confused. My experimental parts are not sold, offered, or ever installed on any one's car but my own. I would never install experimental bits onto a customer's engine - thats your deal.

Like the $3000 to $4000 "oil control kit" you just wrote about. Untested, first one ever built, and there it sits on a customer's car.

Not me, dude.
Carl, come over here please. Greg, you too.

You guys have both accomplished a lot, and contributed a lot to this community, but your styles are very different. Which leads to some disagreements.

Carl, Greg over here has been building engines for a very long time. Give him credit for being careful, thoughtful, and smart. Your last "untested" remark was uncalled for. If you've followed the oil-control thread then I'm sure you appreciate the testing that was done. I've seen the setup on Rob's car, I understand how it works, and it is good, solid engineering. And he's done the testing.

And Carl, your efforts are also impressive, and I really want to see your Bonneville effort be successful.

Nobody is asking you guys to get along, but can we please take it down a notch and not **** on the customers also?

Thanks.
Old 05-22-2011 | 12:12 AM
  #205  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
Blown87, we are a supercharger kit builder. So naturally, most of the engines I am requested to build are prepared for boost, that is: sleeved. The question was: "how many stroker motors have you built" and I answered honestly. Had the question been "how many 928 engines have you built" the answer would have been different.

How many? Well, Greg is partially right, I did purchase all the crap left in the Phil Threshie warehouse. I was after the bare blocks, cranks, and unmolested heads and cams for cores. There was a lot of wild-eyed thinking at 928 Developments, and his plasma-welded camshaft experiments and Tri-Y header mess went right into the dumpster with a lot of similar useless bits.

But the bare engines, cranks, and heads that he hadn't messed up were allright, and thats what I was after.

All those engines are built and shipped, and just recently I was running very low on good cores. Last month I drove to Philly to grab a deal on bare blocks and heads from Mason's defunct business. Again, just to secure more cores at a good price for my customers.

Somebody in this thread added up an engine built by Greg and a similar engine built by us and figured Greg's was $40,000 and our's was $30,000. Maybe this is one of the reason's why.

Look - Greg HAS built more 928 engines than I have and I have said so. And I bet, as 928 engines is all he does and it is not all I do, that this trend will continue.

But to say something like "there is only 1 guy in the world who can do a good job of building a 928 motor" is just nuts. There are many.

And as you know, I like to think we offer a more complete selection of the ancillary bits you need for a High Performance build (the heads, cams, big valves, performance valve springs, head gaskets, pistons, intake manifold research (16v and 32v), oil control kits and scrapers, etc).

So I can't offer more years of experience than Greg. I know. So I offer a better price and more published R&D and engine performance products than he does.

I never said there was just one person who can build a great 928 motor Carl, what the OP asked was "what company builds the best stroker" I normally do not consider a non pro, no matter how good he is, and there are several here that are very good to be a company.

Read what I wrote.


You started my involvement in this thread by implying that you were the LEADER in 928 stroker engines and IMHO you are not, by your own admission you have built 2, one in your car.

By that criteria I am a leader in the field of stock rebuilds, I have done 2, well really one and a partial.

I will be building a stroker soon though, maybe I can be a leader also.

More 928 strokers, built and installed in sharpsburg than anybody

As far as I am concerned it was you who made the misleading statements.

Like what you just wrote, to the unknowing it would come across as you having the only heads, oil pan spacers
and many other parts.
I fully understand why GB does not list his parts, as you do also, why is that Carl?

I have told Greg Brown that he is his worst enemy at times, but I swear you are miles past GB in that regard.

How you handled the control arm issue cost you more than you will ever know, of that I am sure.

I got to say, you two would make far better friends than enemies, but my guess is it has went way to far for that.
Old 05-22-2011 | 12:23 AM
  #206  
Carl Fausett's Avatar
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 60
From: Horicon, WI
Default

Blown 87 - I never said that i was the leader in 928 Stroker engines. If that is the way it sounded to you, I am sorry. In fact, I have posted out several times that I have only built a couple strokers - as I am asked to build sleeved motors much more often.

What I DID say was this:
If you are building a stroker motor and choose not to include the leader in engine developments, you have chosen to cut yourself off from a tremendous number of benefits
"The leader in engine developments" is what I said. And I still think that is a correct statement.
Old 05-22-2011 | 12:26 AM
  #207  
Carl Fausett's Avatar
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 60
From: Horicon, WI
Default

Jim - you are right and right.

I watched this thread for 8 pages before I even joined it because I feared exactly this would happen.
Try to sit on my hands as I may, I can only take so much.

My response to installing experimental parts on customers motors WAS called for, as it was in response to Greg's insinuation that we do that. We do not.

Still, your point is valid and I would welcome the opportunity to take the discussion to a higher plane.
Old 05-22-2011 | 12:44 AM
  #208  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

What ever you say Carl, but that is exactly what you implied.

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
The upper a-arms was not faulty. We refunded the customers money in fiull, and all his shipping charges too. We also sent the upper a arms back to our manufacturer to be remanufactured and they sent them back - there was nothing wrong with them. What they were was different than the customer expected and could understand.

Lets talk about engine building:

We are quite proud of the engines we build and I'd be happy to build one for anyone.

As is our nature - we publish more information about our products and warranties than anybody else so you can do your research. This is true about our engine builds too.

Our engine warranty is in print and you are welcome to read it here: http://www.928motorsports.com/pdf/Re...20Warranty.pdf

Our engine break in procedure is in print and you are welcome to it here: http://www.928motorsports.com/pdf/En...0Procedure.pdf

We are the only builder in this industry that has gone to the trouble to list all the engine building options in a checklist,so you can "build"you own motor and see how much you are spending. Thats is here for short blocks: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/short_block.cfm

and here for long blocks: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/long_block.cfm


Have a look on this page of our extensive work on both 16v and 32v intake manifolds in the "articles" section. http://www.928motorsports.com/install.php

Have a look on this page of our extensive CNC programming for correctly porting 32v 928 heads:
http://www.928motorsports.com/servic...alve_heads.php

Or our research and results on fitting larger-than-stock valves:http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/32v_valves.php

Keep in mind,when you want a stroker motor built: you need to feed the stroker motor or you are wasting your time and money. You need rods, pistons, valve springs, valves, porting, sump kits, oil control kits, and more. No one else offers a more complete list of the needed bits to build your super-motor than we do. Look: www.928engine.com

Show me where the other builders are so good as to publish their research and come up with published numbers to back their claims, and I'll go look at them for you.

We are not a "chosen child" of the SoCal 928 scene, and they like to act like the Rennlist is their personal forum. But if you use your head and look at who is the most published and can show the most development and research than other builders, then you should know what to do.

If you are building a stroker motor and choose not to include the leader in engine developments, you have chosen to cut yourself off from a tremendous number of benefits.
Old 05-22-2011 | 12:57 AM
  #209  
cold_beer839's Avatar
cold_beer839
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
From: Lillington, NC
Default

I hope a price war breaks out. I would definitely pull the trigger on a $5k stroker engine.

Just trying to lighten things up a bit.

GB and Carl are 2 different experts on the 928 engine. One specializes in strokers and the other specializes in purpose-built boosted engines. You guys ought to pass the peace pipe, but I know it's not that simple.
Old 05-22-2011 | 01:14 AM
  #210  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

I am done here, said what I wanted to say, you guys carry on.


Quick Reply: What company best at building Stroker engines from scratch?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:54 AM.