Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

COLD AIR INTAKE NEXT LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2010, 01:37 PM
  #61  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Forgot which post I found the picture on but this would be one way to tie in.
2 Eram without blocking the system or 4 all together time to get Mark going on this:-)
Anyone know if John's air intake up front is replaceing the front snouts or is his air system going up to the stock snouts?
This filter setup,up front may be better and eliminate the filters inside the straights.

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 05-06-2013 at 12:26 AM.
inactiveuser1 is offline  
Old 04-18-2010, 10:42 PM
  #62  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That is a stock shroud. John adds all the stuff forward of the shroud (above and in front of the radiator).

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
dprantl is offline  
Old 04-18-2010, 11:08 PM
  #63  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
less than a rounding error for the pressures and flow we are talking about here. The DC motors are very efficient, near 85%, so at 1000watts, , thats less than 150watts being generated in heat and noise. the pressure generated, FAR outweighs any of these losses due to the motor or compression of the air flow. you cant end up with less than you started. Yes, we have done temp rise measurements, and they match the equatiions are less than rounding errors. The net gains are in expected range as well, for HP.
The equation you're looking for is Boyle's law. Well, a reasonable proximity anyway. In general form it is PV = NRT. Where P = pressure, V = volume, N = number of molecules, R = molecular constant of air, T = temp.

So, the increase in pressure is a direct inverse to the increase in temp, and vice-versa. Classifying it as rounding errors seems a bit disingenuous.

I wouldn't mind seeing your calorimetry tests.
docmirror is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 12:55 AM
  #64  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
That is a stock shroud. John adds all the stuff forward of the shroud (above and in front of the radiator).

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Dan,
thanks for the answer on the stock shroud and only mods above and in front.
inactiveuser1 is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:11 AM
  #65  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

You think Im looking for that?

I'll let you go through the numbers, but what I can say , is that the temperature introduced is a rounding error in the gains, as they themselves are rounding errors as well. (or close anyway because we are talking about 3-6% in total max anyway).

If you double the air temp in a car tire (in F degrees) does the pressure go up double as well? The volume doesn't change that much, no more molecules are introduced, however, there can be some changing of state of air with moisture in it.





Originally Posted by docmirror
The equation you're looking for is Boyle's law. Well, a reasonable proximity anyway. In general form it is PV = NRT. Where P = pressure, V = volume, N = number of molecules, R = molecular constant of air, T = temp.

So, the increase in pressure is a direct inverse to the increase in temp, and vice-versa. Classifying it as rounding errors seems a bit disingenuous.

I wouldn't mind seeing your calorimetry tests.
mark kibort is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:16 AM
  #66  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
You think Im looking for that?

I'll let you go through the numbers, but what I can say , is that the temperature introduced is a rounding error in the gains, as they themselves are rounding errors as well. (or close anyway because we are talking about 3-6% in total max anyway).

If you double the air temp in a car tire, does the pressure go up double as well? The volume doesnt change that much, no more molecules are introduced, however, there can be some changing of state of air with moisture in it.
Yes, it does. Provided the temp of every molecule in the tire is actually double, and the tire doesn't grow at all. Both are very, very rare occurrences, but that's the way the formula works.

The other issue isn't the aggregate addition of heating effect from the motor, but the heating effect of the adiabatic rise due simple to compression. This is what intercoolers are designed to resolve, and why they are so useful.
docmirror is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:28 AM
  #67  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iwanna928
Have you ever look at Knight's electric superchargers? Do not know how to do the link-click thing.

Stephen
Stephen,
This might be what you are looking for on Knight's electric.
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/04...ger/index.html
inactiveuser1 is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:38 AM
  #68  
droy3
Instructor
 
droy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
The equation you're looking for is Boyle's law. Well, a reasonable proximity anyway. In general form it is PV = NRT. Where P = pressure, V = volume, N = number of molecules, R = molecular constant of air, T = temp.

So, the increase in pressure is a direct inverse to the increase in temp, and vice-versa. Classifying it as rounding errors seems a bit disingenuous.

I wouldn't mind seeing your calorimetry tests.
...is that Boyle's law or the ideal gas law? Not nitpicking...just curious.
droy3 is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:57 AM
  #69  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

You missed it. . temp double would have to be the temp based from an absolute zero, not F. 70 to 140 degrees F, doesnt equal doubling the tempurature for Boyle's Law.

So, back to the point. Yes, the motor heating was discussed and its not adding substantial heat to the intake charge based on the volume of air passing over it over time. the compression is slight, the volume doesnt change, so you have more mass flow, albeit at a very slightly higher tempurature.


Originally Posted by docmirror
Yes, it does. Provided the temp of every molecule in the tire is actually double, and the tire doesn't grow at all. Both are very, very rare occurrences, but that's the way the formula works.

The other issue isn't the aggregate addition of heating effect from the motor, but the heating effect of the adiabatic rise due simple to compression. This is what intercoolers are designed to resolve, and why they are so useful.
mark kibort is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 12:29 PM
  #70  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by droy3
...is that Boyle's law or the ideal gas law? Not nitpicking...just curious.
I use them interchangeably, but it's more accurately the ideal gas law. Old school, I'm an old guy.....
docmirror is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 04:26 PM
  #71  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Built another Y pipe which is lower to the MAF.With the welded collar the air travel from the dual air tubes is a shorter distance coming into the single pipe over the MAF.Difference between the 2 pipes in picture below,lower picture is the short built pipe.Might have a contoller built for my next project of the air intake fans will take months yet but when done would hope the whole air system will be good for 20+ HP

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 05-06-2013 at 12:26 AM.
inactiveuser1 is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 08:47 PM
  #72  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Took the car to the track and it was middle of the day which usually isn't as good as when running a car late night closer to 10pm.It was just test and tune day as the regular season hasn't started yet but was able to do some runs for times.
On the left side is from 8/2008 which was the late night runs with stock air intake.MPH was higher with new cold air intake and ET was close to the same
My estimate would be at late night it may drop to high 9.30's as the MPH was around 1.3mph to 2mph higher trap speeds with the cold air intake.
Right side is from 4/2010
Anyone else with stock 928s4 can compare the mph in the 1/8mile as it went to
alittle over 79mph before it always in the 77.mph which the car has never run 79+mph before in the 1/8 mile.Will be interesting to see what the ET will be on a late night run looking forward when races go to nights instead of middle of the day races.
Leaving off the line when the 2nd yellow would light gave some red lights.
Leaving off the line when the 2nd yellow just went off gave .5651 light(reaction time) .5000 is a perfect light.

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 05-06-2013 at 12:26 AM.
inactiveuser1 is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 10:31 PM
  #73  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
You missed it. . temp double would have to be the temp based from an absolute zero, not F. 70 to 140 degrees F, doesnt equal doubling the tempurature for Boyle's Law.

So, back to the point. Yes, the motor heating was discussed and its not adding substantial heat to the intake charge based on the volume of air passing over it over time. the compression is slight, the volume doesnt change, so you have more mass flow, albeit at a very slightly higher tempurature.
Uh, no I didn't. No where did I reference F or C. I'm well aware of the Kelvin scale, which is why I reference T = Temp, not F, not C, but Temp.
docmirror is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 01:45 AM
  #74  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default



Good, so its a little easier to understand that the mods can give a 3-6% hp gain for a 3-6% increase in net pressure gain in the intake, and heating of the air is a rounding error. In fact, the gains themselves are near rounding errors.

mk

Originally Posted by docmirror
Uh, no I didn't. No where did I reference F or C. I'm well aware of the Kelvin scale, which is why I reference T = Temp, not F, not C, but Temp.
mark kibort is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 06:31 PM
  #75  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doing some changes on the last system cut back Y pipe to 7 1/8" long.Drew up another collar that is now offset at the top but also angled so when it comes out will be on centerline down inside.This will pull the pipe around 5/16" to 3/8" more away from the firewall to allow for 4" elbows and 4" pipes along the back firewall.Still have to get it welded up and build out from there again.Might be a good setup if anyone who is running a supercharger using the dual air intakes.Not sure what you guys are running along the back firewall for the superchargers that are running the dual air systems if its 3 1/2" or 4" tubing.It may fit in or it may need alittle more angle have to try it out yet to fit.Cutting the Y pipe down further also opened it up more as the Y pipe get wider inside the more the pipe is trimmed back.There is about .100 of area across that is more open now for air flow.Before the Y pipe opening was around 3.30" across and the MAF is around inlet is around 3.40" being the pipe is trimmed back now across it is opened up to the 3.40"
Might work better for supercharger cars that are using the same dual intake system that want to go to 4" elbows into 4" along the back right before the Y pipe and MAF.
Some options are for NA cars:
1)To wait for the new ERAMs that may be 4inch and run them in the back right before the MAF.
2)Make your own fan system into it with 4" to 5" fans would be around 4000 to 7000 watts with the 22 to 24 volt RC system.
3)Put the 4" internal filters out back along the firewall and run 2 EDF 5" fans into the air canisters that are the same on Rogers system which uses the 5" canisters along the sides of the car.Not sure which would be better 5" fans into the canisters where the filters used to be and 4" air filters in the tubing against the firewall or leave the 5" canisters with the filters there and run the 4" fans inside the tubing out back along the firewall that is closer right before the MAF.May or may not get into the fans but for now air flow will be better with 4" elbows and 4" pipes out back along the firewall and the 3 1/2" Y pipe internal area across is increased going to the MAF.The further the Y pipe can be cut down the area across opens more which is the advantage of using the welded collar.Putting the angle into it the collar now allows more room to fit the tubing size to 4" thruout the system.
Top picture is the increased angle which will allow 4inch tubing out back againt the firewall.The pipe goes thru the bore offset but is on center of the area as it enters the MAF.
Bottom picture is the Y pipe cut to only 7 1/8" wide.

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 05-06-2013 at 12:26 AM.
inactiveuser1 is offline  


Quick Reply: COLD AIR INTAKE NEXT LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:31 AM.