Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:28 PM
  #496  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
This begs the question, do you really need a fuel pump that has more flow than two Bosch 044 pumps? It seems Todd is not having fuel delivery issues and his setup has a bunch more power than yours.
Well that's a great question and I have two not so great answers to that.

First, my plan was to make a fuel system that I would never have to worry about or tweak because it had enough capacity. (What I actually made was a fuel system that I have had to worry about and tweak all the time, but never mind... ;-) )

Second, and more seriously, it has been my goal from day one to create a fuel system and controller that will dynamically only provide slightly more fuel than what is needed. I believe that system will combine the best features of a traditional return line system with a mechanical regulator and a modern flat-head system with electronic pump control - that is, the best fuel system, like, ever.

In a week or two we'll know whether were there.
Old 01-23-2013, 06:49 PM
  #497  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

A fuel system update:

The Fuelab EFPR is installed. One can just connect/disconnect a wire to have it control the fuel pump or just work as a dumb mechanical regulator.

When the EFPR is not controlling the pump, the regulator holds the pressure steady, so the mechanical regulator components works. The pump sounds loud as before. The car runs the same as with the stock regulator if the adjustable pressure is set to be the same as the stock regulator pressure. This is all as expected.

When the EFPR is controlling the pump, the pressure is also steady. After the start up, the pump can't be heard at idle. As the engine is revved, the fuel pressure stays steady. The pump just runs a little bit faster. Haven't measured fuel temperatures yet, but logic dictates they will be more stable than in a completely stock S4 since the system recirculates less fuel. This is also as expected (or, more accurately, as hoped).

The remaining potential failure points that need to be tested and ruled out are:

(1) When the EFPR made of aluminum heats up in the engine compartment, will thermal expansion of the case alter the mechanical fuel pressure set point? This can be a problem with shiny "billet" regulators.

(2) If one cruises at 5500 rpm with light load, and then floors the throttle, will the pump respond quickly enough to the fuel demand to keep the pressure up? That's not a common operating mode, but I want to make sure that the controller and pump are fast enough to respond to even absurd changes in fuel demand without a flat spot.

In other words, so far the Fuelab products seem to work as advertised. This is rare in the aftermarket performance part industry.

Last edited by ptuomov; 01-23-2013 at 08:46 PM.
Old 01-23-2013, 09:52 PM
  #498  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Fuelab is a good product line. Interested in their -10 Efpr. I hear they will make almost anything for you as long as its a derivation of what they already are doing.
Old 01-30-2013, 03:57 PM
  #499  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Today is the day.

John has the car and my permission to blow it up on the dyno. The first serious attempt to destroy the engine will take place today. I think he'll succeed now that the intake tract has been fortified to take over 30 psi. But I've been optimistic in the past, and, despite the high expectations, the car has left the dyno under it's own power.
Old 01-30-2013, 04:03 PM
  #500  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,543
Received 2,728 Likes on 1,327 Posts
Default

Will there be a snuff film at 11?
Old 01-30-2013, 04:04 PM
  #501  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

---------?
Old 01-30-2013, 04:58 PM
  #502  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Will there be a snuff film at 11?
Originally Posted by John Speake
---------?
I hope so.

Some photos below. No engine internals or fluids visible yet.

Name:  Sensors.jpg
Views: 282
Size:  357.0 KB

Name:  PressureGauges.jpg
Views: 284
Size:  318.9 KB

Name:  DataSheet.jpg
Views: 298
Size:  335.1 KB

The most recent situation report from John: "We're at 517 whp now on just under 10psi. That was on many back to back pulls...car was plenty hot. Turbo speed was 102,000 rpm. Exhaust manifold pressure was 19 psig. No pressure in the tailpipe...not even 1 psi."

This is just a warm-up to optimize the fuel and ignition maps for lower loads. I've caned the engine with 20 psi and it's just said "Thank you, Sir, may I have another one, Sir!" One of the advantages of taking it slow while not having to worry about the engine is that one can really develop the knock-constrained optimum tune for every cell very effectively. This is because one can let the tuning algorithm explore the high-knock probability region more freely. Once the map optimization is complete, the wastegate will be bolted shut and then we really see who's the boss.
Old 01-30-2013, 05:05 PM
  #503  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,690
Received 128 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

This is cool!

My clients don't like it when I break their prototypes or production samples. I explain to them the only real way to know is to test to yield.

I suggested to a particular client to hook his product to the hitch of his truck, and give at a good pull. He had a strange look on his face.
Old 01-30-2013, 06:30 PM
  #504  
Roy928tt
Racer
 
Roy928tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide South Australia'79 5spd twin turbo
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

WOW This is going to be really definitive, just how much boost you can pump into a stock 32V 928 engine.

You know what, I reckon it is not just the 928 engine that will be under the pump, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the entire turbo system also reaches beyond it's point of efficiency, ie turbo overspeed, uncontrolled inlet temps etc.

I'm sure you have an idea where that will occur and what sort of numbers to expect should/when it gets there.

I expect that should anything fail within the engine, it will be the head gasket, but under the pressure that it fails at it will take the bore with it, and blow up the radiator !
Old 01-30-2013, 06:34 PM
  #505  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Fail. The first dyno day is over and engine is in one piece. The maps are getting optimzied though.
Old 01-30-2013, 06:54 PM
  #506  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,490
Received 1,636 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

Longevity at any power level is the more interesting metric.

Top fuel and funny car dragsters put down what? 6000 hp? But they only run for 8 seconds between rebuilds.

Given the conditons, I will be mildly surprised if the long block fails before stuff attached to it fails. Once in the "real world" though, it'll be different and I too bet on head gaskets.

Regardless, this is an awesome experiment!
Old 01-30-2013, 06:57 PM
  #507  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roy928tt

You know what, I reckon it is not just the 928 engine that will be under the pump, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the entire turbo system also reaches beyond it's point of efficiency, ie turbo overspeed, uncontrolled inlet temps etc.

I'm sure you have an idea where that will occur and what sort of numbers to expect should/when it gets there.
There is a turbine speed sensor mounted on this car and John is paying attention to wheel speed.
Old 01-30-2013, 07:01 PM
  #508  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You're wasting your time. Those turbos are not big enough to blow the engine up in a short dyno run if it is well tuned...

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 01-30-2013, 07:53 PM
  #509  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

You should really be running some ethanol so you won't blow anything up.
Old 01-30-2013, 07:56 PM
  #510  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roy928tt
WOW This is going to be really definitive, just how much boost you can pump into a stock 32V 928 engine.
Not really, as he is not optimized for what the stated test - which is pure air flow, fuel, and the mechanical strength of the engine package. Whether or not the engine will blow up when he detonates it with a bad spark or a lean run will prove nothing other than that means nothing. Detonation will blow up an engine at low power as well. A true test is how much power will it hold without detonating.


Quick Reply: Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:58 PM.