Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Inexpensive Super Cars? What's your suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2010, 12:51 PM
  #76  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,814
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

TV, that is a poor definition of a kit car. By that definition the big Dodge pickups with Cummins engines (sourced from Cummins) are kit cars. DeTomaso was a real company that made multiple models of cars over time, the Pantera being the most well known.

"Kit cars" are cars you buy in kit form and assemble yourself.
Old 01-15-2010, 12:53 PM
  #77  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To add a few more to that, Subaru is building engines for the new Toyota sportscar, and Mitsubishi built Chrysler engines for YEARS. Ford Rangers, Mercury Capris and a lot more used Mazda engines. There's so much inbreeding in the automotive industry it's hard to figure out who made what.
Old 01-15-2010, 12:54 PM
  #78  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,814
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

And modern Lotus's use Toyotas.
Old 01-15-2010, 01:13 PM
  #79  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,144
Received 256 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

But that is my definition for me, because the engine is the most costly to engineer, to assemble, The engine IS what makes the car the car. That's what gives my euro it's character, that smooth power.


There is a term - Coachbuilder. Another term - Design House.


Pininfarina - purely design.

De Tomaso, Bertone - more coachbuilder, because their in-house activity was the body, then assembly of a package

Ferrari - true manufacturer - they actually have a foundry where they pour the blocks on site



GM, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, BMW, Mercedes all those big industrials build engines. They are manufacturers.


If you don't design and assemble the engine that goes in your car your are not a true car company, IN MY OPINION. That does not mean the product is bad.

And what about AMG?
Old 01-15-2010, 01:14 PM
  #80  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You know, the auto transmission in the 928 came from Mercedes. . . is the 928 a kit car?
Old 01-15-2010, 01:17 PM
  #81  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tv
And what about AMG?
Pretty sure they're just an in-house performance group, like STi (Subaru Technica International), NISMO or Mazdaspeed.
Old 01-15-2010, 01:26 PM
  #82  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,144
Received 256 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

I should have used the term Coachbuilder to describe the De Tomaso in my first post, as kit- car may have given some readers the impression of meaning cheap or a put-down on the car itself. That was not my intention.

But I do not see De Tomaso as a manufacturer. In fact the Bricklin also used the Ford 351 engine, so even though the cars looked nothing alike, when you stepped on the gas there has to be some strong similiarities.
Old 01-15-2010, 01:38 PM
  #83  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,144
Received 256 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Richter12x2
You know, the auto transmission in the 928 came from Mercedes. . . is the 928 a kit car?
I left Porsche out above - specifically because they outsourced a lot of what had to be done, BUT the engineering and asssembly was theirs and it is what a lot do today, outsourcing parts, not design.

There really isn’t a “Borg Warner” transaxle, yes they sourced the production but the design and patents are
Porsche’s.
- Porsche 928 A/T transaxle sourcing: yes they use Mercedes parts, it wasn’t realistic to produce a separate
transmission for such a small manufacturing line. However Porsche worked to tune the design for the 928.




Even our engine blocks were done by Kolbenschmidt, our pistons by Mahle, but done to the Porsche engineered design and assembled by Porsche.

Will you find the same engine in another companies body? Only 1 special, extra wide VW.

Old 01-15-2010, 01:53 PM
  #84  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bronto
And modern Lotus's use Toyotas.
Contrast that with early Lotii that used Ford and Renault engines and driveline parts, with suspension bits sourced from other British makes like Triumph. The driveline and suspension in my 23's look suspisciously Ford-like, with early Spitfire front suspension bolted on. My very early Europa and Elan used the same front arms and very similarly-sourced brakes. Other early road cars, especially the Seven cars, were just barely north of kit cars that were "factory" assembled for the buyers. Some mid-life models also used Isuzu engines IIRC. It wasn't until tthe early 70's that Lotus got to the business of serious engine design below the heads, and even then the actual foundry and much of the assembly work was sourced from other neighboring car manufacturers. At least they had the forethought to design the early four-cylinder blocks to provide for easy expansion to eight later.
Old 01-15-2010, 02:01 PM
  #85  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,814
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

"Lotii"
Old 01-15-2010, 02:07 PM
  #86  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,020
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Great thread...

I've also been toying with buying something new but it would mean getting rid of the 928 and I can't seem to find any other super car that is worthy except for mabye the Testarossa. Prices are still high and I would want a perfect condition car with full maintenance so its definitely out of the question for now.
Old 01-15-2010, 02:19 PM
  #87  
F451
Rennlist Member
 
F451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 3,267
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Pantera. Loved them since a guy in my town had one when I was a kid. I used to drool over it on a regular basis as he parked it in his driveway quite often, and drove it often as well. One bad *** car for sure.

I'd love to pick one up. Then again, I'd love to pick up a whole lot of these bargain cars.

Its a great time to be exotic shopping right now.

Great thread.
Old 01-15-2010, 02:27 PM
  #88  
polecat702
Vegas, Baby!
Rennlist Member


 
polecat702's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: far away
Posts: 11,536
Received 381 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

There are zero similarities between a Bricklin and a Pantera. A Pantera was a street version of the Ford GT 40. It uses the same transaxel, and on 15 inch wheels sits 40 inches tall, with tons of performance potential. At $10,000.00 new mine has gone up 8 hundred percent, but thats still about half of what I've spent on it in the past 36 years. IIRC the stock Panteras would run out over 150MPH when they were new. The Bricklin got a 351 smog motor that was a piece of garbage. BTW the Polecat is a GT 5, there are very few in this country, and has a 427 Windsor stroker, and Whipple blower 60% underdriven backed by a new 6 speed transaxel. 700 plus on the ground. And it's streetable, most of the high dollar exotics are not, except Porsches.
Old 01-15-2010, 02:29 PM
  #89  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
Great thread...

I've also been toying with buying something new but it would mean getting rid of the 928 and I can't seem to find any other super car that is worthy except for mabye the Testarossa. Prices are still high and I would want a perfect condition car with full maintenance so its definitely out of the question for now.
Like I said, the Esprit is the value play in this area. If you're not too tall they are fairly comfy from 88 on. Here's one that's a pretty good deal:

http://tucson.craigslist.org/cto/1532784774.html
Old 01-15-2010, 03:12 PM
  #90  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,020
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
Like I said, the Esprit is the value play in this area. If you're not too tall they are fairly comfy from 88 on. Here's one that's a pretty good deal:

http://tucson.craigslist.org/cto/1532784774.html
I'm not a fan of buying high mileage cars unless they are truly up to date and cosmetically restored. I want the experience of driving a "new" old car. For $15K I can't imagine that car has up to date maintenance or am I wrong?

Knowing that cars are not investments....I still would be gunshy about buying a Lotus which may have a high maintenance cost associated with it and a low resale value if I get bored with it. Elise might be an exception to this...

I haven't really perused the Lotus Esprit forums, are they as supportive and knowledgeable as the Porshce or Ferrari forums? Could I maintain as easily as the 928? Are multiple parts sources available? I know the redhead will cost more but it will also hold its value and or increase based upon demand which means at least you won't lose the money at a rapid rate.


Quick Reply: Inexpensive Super Cars? What's your suggestions?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:02 PM.