Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Non-proprietary stroker assembly thread :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2010, 07:47 PM
  #61  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
The length of the belt, and the amount of tension delivered by the tensioner is only relevant between the 1-4 cam gear and the crank gear. Between the other gears, the tension is dependent on the action of the crankshaft, and the resistance of the valve train. '
It almost sounds like you are saying that the tension on the slack side has no bearing on the other side.

Once again Ken, I am not trying to be combative, just trying to understand this all.

Which I do not at this point.

How did you chose which tensioner to use?

There are hundreds, if not thousands of part numbers out there for different tensioners.
Old 01-18-2010, 08:04 PM
  #62  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Well, there you go. kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap? It seems to me that the driver side with more "wrap" is on the power side of the tension and has the passenger side cam to always keep tension tight under rapid acceleration. the crank gear has a lot of "wrap", not from the oil pump, but the tensoner that presses the belt around the crank pulley. So,its wrap is on top of the pulley, not toward the oil pump pulley horizontally.

I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?


Originally Posted by PorKen
The 1-4 gear has a lot of belt wrap, and is in little danger of coming off. The crank gear must have as many teeth enaged as possible at all times, because the oil pump gear precludes a 'wrap' pulley on the pulled side.

Acceleration is where the Audi type tensioner/damper is superior. With a quick acceleration of the crankshaft, the belt is stretched around the gears, and there is temporarily more belt on the 'loose' side. The T/D extends and retracts to keep the tension more or less constant. More importantly, the belt stays wrapped on the crank gear. With the stock detensioner, no extension is possible so the belt flaps!

High belt tension will limit the flapping to certain harmonics, but at the cost of belt, and bearing life.
Old 01-18-2010, 08:42 PM
  #63  
andy-gts
Drifting
 
andy-gts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: lawrence,kansas
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Is it possible to film the tow systems on a dyno with rapid accel and decel . We may be supprised what is found....kinda like what louie did to find the aeration of oil with long hard sweeping turns helping to starve the bearing of oil.
Louie are you out there?

andy
Old 01-18-2010, 08:45 PM
  #64  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Well, there you go. kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap? It seems to me that the driver side with more "wrap" is on the power side of the tension and has the passenger side cam to always keep tension tight under rapid acceleration. the crank gear has a lot of "wrap", not from the oil pump, but the tensoner that presses the belt around the crank pulley. So,its wrap is on top of the pulley, not toward the oil pump pulley horizontally.

I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
The actual problem with gear wear is from things being loose. Belts that get good maintainance and are adjusted to 5.0 "belt units" will allow the gears to last virtually forever. When the belt tension goes down...the gears wear very, very quickly. That's why Porsche has that great big "idiot" light come on at 3.7 "belt units".
Old 01-18-2010, 08:53 PM
  #65  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

I have one of these, for my Ducati's. Not made by Goodyear, but the same thing.

I'll dig it out and see what it tells me.
'
This is the ideal time for me to switch back and forth between stock and your system...to see what the differences are.
Old 01-18-2010, 08:59 PM
  #66  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 391 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

You'll need to spin the engine with a starter to equalize the belt tension, first.
Old 01-18-2010, 09:18 PM
  #67  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 391 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap?

I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
It's still about wrap. You need enough tension to maintain belt engagement.

I would guess your 1-4 gear slip more likely happened after abruptly letting off the gas, after accelerating. The low tension allowed enough belt to stack up under acceleration between the 1-4 gear and the tensioner pulley so that when the pulley went from being driven to driving the belt, the belt walked over the teeth.

If you switched to a PKsn'r, you would likely find that the engine is quieter, and revs more smoothly. Excessive belt tension steals HP.
Old 01-18-2010, 09:30 PM
  #68  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

interesting that a LACK of belt tension causes the gears to wear...I thought over tension would cause the various belt gears to wear out?

One thing I noticed on the lemons racer that I have never seen before is how much "flap" there is on the belt....when we were adjusting something (can't remember) I would rev up the engine at the TB and could see the drivers side cam gear (5-8?) under quick acceleration-deceleration the belt would "flex" in middle quite a bit.....I would say if the belt position at idle (running) is zero (as in neutral) that the maximum amount of flap is +/- 1 inch peak values.....I don't know if thats enough to skip teeth or anything...but the belt was always set slightly tight on the kempf tool...
Old 01-18-2010, 09:31 PM
  #69  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
The actual problem with gear wear is from things being loose. Belts that get good maintainance and are adjusted to 5.0 "belt units" will allow the gears to last virtually forever. When the belt tension goes down...the gears wear very, very quickly. That's why Porsche has that great big "idiot" light come on at 3.7 "belt units".
I thought the belt being loose would make the gears wear faster.

I think that may be the reason that some gears look great after X miles and some are just gone.
Old 01-18-2010, 09:33 PM
  #70  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 391 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
It almost sounds like you are saying that the tension on the slack side has no bearing on the other side.
A used belt can only stretch so far during acceleration. The crank gear pulls the belt tight as it tries to get the cams to turn. The slack side has to be controlled, but not overtight.

At a constant rpm the cams still take force to turn maintaining the tension. (32Vs take more HP to drive the cams, than a 16V, but they make this up with higher volumetric effeciency.)


Originally Posted by blown 87
How did you chose which tensioner to use?
The one that fit! Which just happened to work well on a 928 engine.
Old 01-18-2010, 09:39 PM
  #71  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
It's still about wrap. You need enough tension to maintain belt engagement.

I would guess your 1-4 gear slip more likely happened after abruptly letting off the gas, after accelerating. The low tension allowed enough belt to stack up under acceleration between the 1-4 gear and the tensioner pulley so that when the pulley went from being driven to driving the belt, the belt walked over the teeth.

If you switched to a PKsn'r, you would likely find that the engine is quieter, and revs more smoothly. Excessive belt tension steals HP.
The ones I have done did not get quieter, if anything they got louder with a gear type sound.

Mark was your belt loose when it slipped?
Old 01-18-2010, 09:45 PM
  #72  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 391 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

5.0 (32V, 16V 4.5) units on the Porsche belt tension gauge means little once the engine is turning.

Compare it to 200+ psi compression while turning the engine with the starter. If you have big cams with lots of duration, the dynamic compression will be lower (so you have to have high compression to start with).

The PKsn'r has a more consistent belt tension when the engine is turning than the stock detensioner system. The easiest way to see this is with the flapping. The PKsn'r doesn't flap, and the belt doesn't come off, despite the best efforts of myself, and many others. The stock belt flaps at certain rpm/harmonics, even when set very tight.
Old 01-18-2010, 09:54 PM
  #73  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen

The one that fit!

Old 01-18-2010, 10:04 PM
  #74  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 391 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
"Which just happened to work well on a 928 engine."


I really don't understand all the wanking on about this improved tensioner system. It works well. It works better than the stock system.

It works well at low rpm, it works well at high rpm. It works well at very cold temps, it works well at very hot temps. It works well on the autobahn at max V, it works well on the dyno at W-O-T.

The whole system is more robust than the stock system. It's overbuilt! It's simpler than the stock system. It's simpler to maintain than the stock system.

What else are you looking for? A 'happy ending'?
Old 01-18-2010, 11:26 PM
  #75  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

as a possible "answer" to the dilemma at hand....I will kindly volunteer the 928 "estate" Lemons racer as a test mule for the Porkensioner!! 4 races are planned for this season plus a bunch of practice sessions.... We might even venture up north to Porken land for a different POS race car series....

16 hours of racing in a weekend..... x 4 races = 64 hours...add in test days and the engine probably sees 100+ racing hours a year....

:>)


Quick Reply: Non-proprietary stroker assembly thread :)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:27 AM.