Non-proprietary stroker assembly thread :)
#61
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Once again Ken, I am not trying to be combative, just trying to understand this all.
Which I do not at this point.
How did you chose which tensioner to use?
There are hundreds, if not thousands of part numbers out there for different tensioners.
#62
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, there you go. kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap? It seems to me that the driver side with more "wrap" is on the power side of the tension and has the passenger side cam to always keep tension tight under rapid acceleration. the crank gear has a lot of "wrap", not from the oil pump, but the tensoner that presses the belt around the crank pulley. So,its wrap is on top of the pulley, not toward the oil pump pulley horizontally.
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
The 1-4 gear has a lot of belt wrap, and is in little danger of coming off. The crank gear must have as many teeth enaged as possible at all times, because the oil pump gear precludes a 'wrap' pulley on the pulled side.
Acceleration is where the Audi type tensioner/damper is superior. With a quick acceleration of the crankshaft, the belt is stretched around the gears, and there is temporarily more belt on the 'loose' side. The T/D extends and retracts to keep the tension more or less constant. More importantly, the belt stays wrapped on the crank gear. With the stock detensioner, no extension is possible so the belt flaps!
High belt tension will limit the flapping to certain harmonics, but at the cost of belt, and bearing life.
Acceleration is where the Audi type tensioner/damper is superior. With a quick acceleration of the crankshaft, the belt is stretched around the gears, and there is temporarily more belt on the 'loose' side. The T/D extends and retracts to keep the tension more or less constant. More importantly, the belt stays wrapped on the crank gear. With the stock detensioner, no extension is possible so the belt flaps!
High belt tension will limit the flapping to certain harmonics, but at the cost of belt, and bearing life.
#63
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is it possible to film the tow systems on a dyno with rapid accel and decel . We may be supprised what is found....kinda like what louie did to find the aeration of oil with long hard sweeping turns helping to starve the bearing of oil.
Louie are you out there?
andy
Louie are you out there?
andy
#64
Former Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, there you go. kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap? It seems to me that the driver side with more "wrap" is on the power side of the tension and has the passenger side cam to always keep tension tight under rapid acceleration. the crank gear has a lot of "wrap", not from the oil pump, but the tensoner that presses the belt around the crank pulley. So,its wrap is on top of the pulley, not toward the oil pump pulley horizontally.
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
#65
Former Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll dig it out and see what it tells me.
'
This is the ideal time for me to switch back and forth between stock and your system...to see what the differences are.
#66
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You'll need to spin the engine with a starter to equalize the belt tension, first.
#67
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
kind of a follow on to my question and point, that it doesnt seem like "wrap" is the main factor, its tension. why, in my case, did the passenger side, with more "wrap" jump 3 teeth with much more wrap?
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
I think what you are saying is that you get better belt wrap with the audi tensioner, and it absorbs some flutter better due to a spring loaded piston movment, whereas the stock tensioner, uses more tension to accomplish the same thing at the cost of pulley wear. However, my pulleys have always looked brand new in all the cars Ive race and driven for over 23 years now. Ive seen some REAL gouged pulleys, but that is probably due to over tension. Maybe the audi tension is easier (no work) vs the porsche tension which needs some skill to set. BUT, if you have the skill, do you need the audi tensioner?
I would guess your 1-4 gear slip more likely happened after abruptly letting off the gas, after accelerating. The low tension allowed enough belt to stack up under acceleration between the 1-4 gear and the tensioner pulley so that when the pulley went from being driven to driving the belt, the belt walked over the teeth.
If you switched to a PKsn'r, you would likely find that the engine is quieter, and revs more smoothly. Excessive belt tension steals HP.
#68
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
interesting that a LACK of belt tension causes the gears to wear...I thought over tension would cause the various belt gears to wear out?
One thing I noticed on the lemons racer that I have never seen before is how much "flap" there is on the belt....when we were adjusting something (can't remember) I would rev up the engine at the TB and could see the drivers side cam gear (5-8?) under quick acceleration-deceleration the belt would "flex" in middle quite a bit.....I would say if the belt position at idle (running) is zero (as in neutral) that the maximum amount of flap is +/- 1 inch peak values.....I don't know if thats enough to skip teeth or anything...but the belt was always set slightly tight on the kempf tool...
One thing I noticed on the lemons racer that I have never seen before is how much "flap" there is on the belt....when we were adjusting something (can't remember) I would rev up the engine at the TB and could see the drivers side cam gear (5-8?) under quick acceleration-deceleration the belt would "flex" in middle quite a bit.....I would say if the belt position at idle (running) is zero (as in neutral) that the maximum amount of flap is +/- 1 inch peak values.....I don't know if thats enough to skip teeth or anything...but the belt was always set slightly tight on the kempf tool...
#69
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The actual problem with gear wear is from things being loose. Belts that get good maintainance and are adjusted to 5.0 "belt units" will allow the gears to last virtually forever. When the belt tension goes down...the gears wear very, very quickly. That's why Porsche has that great big "idiot" light come on at 3.7 "belt units".
I think that may be the reason that some gears look great after X miles and some are just gone.
#70
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
At a constant rpm the cams still take force to turn maintaining the tension. (32Vs take more HP to drive the cams, than a 16V, but they make this up with higher volumetric effeciency.)
The one that fit! Which just happened to work well on a 928 engine.
#71
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's still about wrap. You need enough tension to maintain belt engagement.
I would guess your 1-4 gear slip more likely happened after abruptly letting off the gas, after accelerating. The low tension allowed enough belt to stack up under acceleration between the 1-4 gear and the tensioner pulley so that when the pulley went from being driven to driving the belt, the belt walked over the teeth.
If you switched to a PKsn'r, you would likely find that the engine is quieter, and revs more smoothly. Excessive belt tension steals HP.
I would guess your 1-4 gear slip more likely happened after abruptly letting off the gas, after accelerating. The low tension allowed enough belt to stack up under acceleration between the 1-4 gear and the tensioner pulley so that when the pulley went from being driven to driving the belt, the belt walked over the teeth.
If you switched to a PKsn'r, you would likely find that the engine is quieter, and revs more smoothly. Excessive belt tension steals HP.
Mark was your belt loose when it slipped?
#72
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
5.0 (32V, 16V 4.5) units on the Porsche belt tension gauge means little once the engine is turning.
Compare it to 200+ psi compression while turning the engine with the starter. If you have big cams with lots of duration, the dynamic compression will be lower (so you have to have high compression to start with).
The PKsn'r has a more consistent belt tension when the engine is turning than the stock detensioner system. The easiest way to see this is with the flapping. The PKsn'r doesn't flap, and the belt doesn't come off, despite the best efforts of myself, and many others. The stock belt flaps at certain rpm/harmonics, even when set very tight.
Compare it to 200+ psi compression while turning the engine with the starter. If you have big cams with lots of duration, the dynamic compression will be lower (so you have to have high compression to start with).
The PKsn'r has a more consistent belt tension when the engine is turning than the stock detensioner system. The easiest way to see this is with the flapping. The PKsn'r doesn't flap, and the belt doesn't come off, despite the best efforts of myself, and many others. The stock belt flaps at certain rpm/harmonics, even when set very tight.
#74
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Which just happened to work well on a 928 engine."
I really don't understand all the wanking on about this improved tensioner system. It works well. It works better than the stock system.
It works well at low rpm, it works well at high rpm. It works well at very cold temps, it works well at very hot temps. It works well on the autobahn at max V, it works well on the dyno at W-O-T.
The whole system is more robust than the stock system. It's overbuilt! It's simpler than the stock system. It's simpler to maintain than the stock system.
What else are you looking for? A 'happy ending'?
I really don't understand all the wanking on about this improved tensioner system. It works well. It works better than the stock system.
It works well at low rpm, it works well at high rpm. It works well at very cold temps, it works well at very hot temps. It works well on the autobahn at max V, it works well on the dyno at W-O-T.
The whole system is more robust than the stock system. It's overbuilt! It's simpler than the stock system. It's simpler to maintain than the stock system.
What else are you looking for? A 'happy ending'?
#75
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
as a possible "answer" to the dilemma at hand....I will kindly volunteer the 928 "estate" Lemons racer as a test mule for the Porkensioner!! 4 races are planned for this season plus a bunch of practice sessions.... We might even venture up north to Porken land for a different POS race car series....
16 hours of racing in a weekend..... x 4 races = 64 hours...add in test days and the engine probably sees 100+ racing hours a year....
:>)
16 hours of racing in a weekend..... x 4 races = 64 hours...add in test days and the engine probably sees 100+ racing hours a year....
:>)