Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rob's GTS engine pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2009 | 04:38 PM
  #106  
Mako 928's Avatar
Mako 928
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: S.F. Bay Area
Default

I agree with Dave,Sidehatch. The nuts had to come off before all of the carnage, which would be a good indicator to the cause. It would be interesting to see what the tourque is on the remaining rod nuts.
Old 06-07-2009 | 04:55 PM
  #107  
sidehatch's Avatar
sidehatch
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 1
Default

Just so you know i guessed lol,i dont even know what those parts are and if you offered me 10k to tell you, i would loose. Im screwed too, i put thousands in my car and i think shes ready to blow up.
Old 06-07-2009 | 05:02 PM
  #108  
IcemanG17's Avatar
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,271
Likes: 75
From: Stockton, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mako 928
I agree with Dave,Sidehatch. The nuts had to come off before all of the carnage, which would be a good indicator to the cause. It would be interesting to see what the tourque is on the remaining rod nuts.
This would be a GREAT test.....if the others are stupid loose.....theres a HUGE factor in the problem!!
Old 06-07-2009 | 05:11 PM
  #109  
Tom. M's Avatar
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 202
Default

So..which came first..spun rod bearing ..? or backed off rod nuts?..From what I remember...Tom never got into the engine other than routine service and had driven it for at least 5 years..his only real problem being oil consumption.

Maybe the spun bearing heated it up, started hammering, and rod nuts backed off. Or perhaps excessive detonation backed off the rod nuts..and the bearing let go?

Wonder if you can ever find out ?
Old 06-07-2009 | 08:33 PM
  #110  
S4ordie's Avatar
S4ordie
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,856
Likes: 335
From: Chandler, AZ, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Default

Looking at the original carnage pics of the bearing and nuts, the nuts looked stretched, which to me seems like they were pulled off the bolt. Flat threads on one of the bolts might be the confirmation.

I am no expert at post mortem engine forensics, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.
Old 06-07-2009 | 09:49 PM
  #111  
dr bob's Avatar
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,506
Likes: 549
From: Bend, Oregon
Default

I'm thinking you probably don't want to reuse those nuts. Even if you chase the threads, you'll never get the outsides right for a good fit in the crescent wrench. Just sayin'...
Old 06-07-2009 | 10:06 PM
  #112  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

The nuts are somewhat less than round secondary to their being launched into who knows what after coming off the rod bolts. The threads inside the nuts are strikingly intact and not rolled over. The threads on the rod bolts that you can see are focally flattened a bit but I would think the rod bolt threads would be LOT flatter than they are if the nuts were hammered off over the threads. But then I went into biology instead of engineering 'cause I couldn't hack the math. What do I know?

EDIT: I took a look at some of the rod bearing shells to check the dates on them and most (including those from rod #6) are date stamped 6/85, which suggests that (most likely) none of the rod bearings were ever changed since the engine was new. Curious that they had 7 year old stocks of bearings when building these GTS's.....

Last edited by Rob Edwards; 06-08-2009 at 02:21 AM.
Old 06-08-2009 | 02:09 PM
  #113  
Bill51sdr's Avatar
Bill51sdr
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,780
Likes: 49
From: We are there!(San Diego)
Default

I've seen this kind of thing happen before on another engine. Not sure about the history of your (late) engine, but I have a feeling that at least the pan has been off and some if not all of the rod bearing caps were removed/reinstalled. What I think could have happened here is that the bearing cap in question here was not seated properly, possibly one side binding on the stud, on the journal when it was installed and was torqued down that way. Once the engine was run a while, both nuts worked their way loose, loosening the bearing cap & voila, you have Rob on the side of the freeway with a perforated oil pan.
Old 07-22-2009 | 06:56 PM
  #114  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Greg did some post-mortem (and I do mean post-mortem, now...) measurements on the crank today:

And I quote:

Worn .040" on backside of throw. Will need to go to .060" to clean, maybe .080. Can't chrome a journal that far.

Crank is bent .008"

Would need to be welded, straightened, machined, and the mains will need to be .010 undersize to fix the "bend". Might crack when welded. When done, you will have a "used carlot" repaired crank.
Old 07-22-2009 | 07:33 PM
  #115  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Greg did some post-mortem (and I do mean post-mortem, now...) measurements on the crank today:

And I quote:
and its probably not very cheap to do all that on top of it.

Bummer Rob

are there any new thoughts as to what actually happened? Do you think its just that the track sessions wore out the bearing and it eventually just gave way on your drive?
Old 07-22-2009 | 08:28 PM
  #116  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Ryan-

I think that someone at some point R&R'ed the rod bearings on 2 & 6 and didn't get them torqued properly. That is just my conjecture, and I could certainly be wrong, I'm no engineer, and my expertise in failure analysis is limited to dead bodies Doesn't matter, I've already stuck my fork in that motor and am movin' on, as they say. The reciprocating assembly for the stroker is getting balanced this week and the shortblock starts to go together in about 2 weeks.
Old 07-22-2009 | 08:57 PM
  #117  
86'928S MeteorGrey's Avatar
86'928S MeteorGrey
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: Surprise, Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Ryan-

I think that someone at some point R&R'ed the rod bearings on 2 & 6 and didn't get them torqued properly. That is just my conjecture, and I could certainly be wrong, I'm no engineer, and my expertise in failure analysis is limited to dead bodies Doesn't matter, I've already stuck my fork in that motor and am movin' on, as they say. The reciprocating assembly for the stroker is getting balanced this week and the shortblock starts to go together in about 2 weeks.
That's a real bummer on that GTS engine...What are you going to do with it now?
Old 07-22-2009 | 09:12 PM
  #118  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Hold on to it for a couple of years (decades?) until I'm convinced that the Porsche 928GTS collector market will never value a repainted, high mileage 5-speed GTS enough to warrant doing some outrageous repairs on this block to keep the car 'numbers matching' ?

It'll never make sense to fix the block, the crank, find 3 GTS pistons, replacement rods, and a complete rebuild on top of all that just to have a 'repaired' motor that I'd never trust to drive in anger. So I guess I've got a bunch of decent spare heads and parts. Much of the ancillary bits from the GTS (A/C comp, air pump, alt, PS pump, Hall sensor, MAF, air cleaner, TPS, CPS) are going to become part of the stroker. And Greg welded the hole in the GTS' oil pan so it could go on the stroker, just to have a little more GTS DNA in there....


RE: the crank, Greg did allow that the crank could be turned down to fit custom Chevy sized rods, and then cross drilled, but it'd be expensive.....
Old 07-23-2009 | 12:05 AM
  #119  
jcorenman's Avatar
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,067
Likes: 323
From: Friday Harbor, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
...
RE: the crank, Greg did allow that the crank could be turned down to fit custom Chevy sized rods, and then cross drilled, but it'd be expensive.....
Yeah, but then you would have to use something besides Porsche rod bearings ...
Old 09-06-2009 | 01:09 PM
  #120  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,859
From: Irvine, CA
Default

One area to add to your PPI list- the rear floor under the mats. If there are rollbar holes and a seatbelt anchor, you might wonder how much time the oil in that car's motor spent suspended against the sides of the sump....




Quick Reply: Rob's GTS engine pull



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:24 AM.