Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Laguna Seca this weekend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2008, 05:40 AM
  #106  
JKelly
Burning Brakes
 
JKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Man that is great video. You wouldn't believe it unless you saw it. There it is at :11 /:15 Mark A completely had the line and the other car was trying to wedge himself in between the wall and Mark's car. The missed gear makes no difference. The guy was taking the same line anyway......he could have even been pinched worse if Mark had connected with his gear sooner.
Old 08-26-2008, 05:45 AM
  #107  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zekgb
He got plowed into from behind (you can't really see it in the in car), he didnt have much choice in the matter. I'm obviously a layman here, but I don't know what else he could have done.
That's true. I think when you see the car shoot forward into Mark, at least part of his momentum was from a hit by the yellow car. There were yellow spoiler pieces littering the area.
Old 08-26-2008, 08:06 AM
  #108  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looking at that video the only cars that need to be DQ'd and given a 13/13 are the video car and the car that got squeezed. The video car for smacking the rear of the squeezed car and the squeezed car for trying a very innappropriate move for a "club race." It was if there was a million dollar purse they were going after. Mark A. who was in front of both of them had no control over what happened behind him.

Missing a shift unintentionally does not to me constitute a DQ and 13/13 violation. Like Greg B. has already mentioned, if that's the new standard, there would not be very many racers left in any race organization. I say bad call from the officials and if I were Mark A. with so much time in the POC I would contest these findings.

Arm chair race official,
Constantine
Old 08-26-2008, 08:17 AM
  #109  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So a 13/13 means you are out for 13 races or 13 months whichever is longer? Please clarify.

Thanks
Old 08-26-2008, 10:54 AM
  #110  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

it means for the next 13 months, if you get in another body contact event, even off track alone and cause damage to yourself, you are banned for 13months.
I think it was really BS that they sent mark home after this, after all, it was kind of one of those "racing" incidents. no one really could have avoided it, except maybe the car fitting through the closing space before start finish.

Man, that 928 is TOUGH!

mk


Originally Posted by Fabio421
So a 13/13 means you are out for 13 races or 13 months whichever is longer? Please clarify.

Thanks
Old 08-26-2008, 11:00 AM
  #111  
zekgb
Three Wheelin'
 
zekgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,794
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Constantine
Looking at that video the only cars that need to be DQ'd and given a 13/13 are the video car and the car that got squeezed. The video car for smacking the rear of the squeezed car and the squeezed car for trying a very innappropriate move for a "club race." It was if there was a million dollar purse they were going after. Mark A. who was in front of both of them had no control over what happened behind him.
I don't take the squeezed car's move as anything more than a split second decision on the best way to avoid Mark's slowing car, it did not appear to me as some kamikaze passing attempt. I don't think he had much control over the car once he gets hit from behind, and as I said earlier (and thought in real time even before seeing the video) the yellow car's jump on the start and contact with the squeezed car is the real cause of the wreck.
Old 08-26-2008, 11:24 AM
  #112  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zekgb
I don't take the squeezed car's move as anything more than a split second decision on the best way to avoid Mark's slowing car, it did not appear to me as some kamikaze passing attempt. I don't think he had much control over the car once he gets hit from behind, and as I said earlier (and thought in real time even before seeing the video) the yellow car's jump on the start and contact with the squeezed car is the real cause of the wreck.
I have been in the exact same situation as the video wallkisser. You can even see in the video that he lifts and then after the decision to pass guns it. I did the same thing but luckily had a gravel trap to use.

He made the decision to pass, as any racer would do. It is one of those risks that is part of the game.
Old 08-26-2008, 01:57 PM
  #113  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

I still dont see the contact besides when he hits door to side with anderson.
are you talking about the filming car touching the rear bumper as he makes his move? I dont think there was contact there, and if so, it didnt effect the doomed 911 turbo

mk

Originally Posted by zekgb
I don't take the squeezed car's move as anything more than a split second decision on the best way to avoid Mark's slowing car, it did not appear to me as some kamikaze passing attempt. I don't think he had much control over the car once he gets hit from behind, and as I said earlier (and thought in real time even before seeing the video) the yellow car's jump on the start and contact with the squeezed car is the real cause of the wreck.
Old 08-26-2008, 02:25 PM
  #114  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I dont know what tape you are looking at, but no one got hit from behind.
anderson got hit on the side and the car getting pinched got some damage on both sides.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Ac3cNjn-JUw

MK
This is what Anderson got DQ'd for...what a joke....sure he slowed a little bit, but the turbo that wrecked seriously jumped the start and put himself in a bad line.....both the guy that wrecked and the camera car should also have been DQ'd but I'm sure they didn't since they are rear engine cars....
Old 08-26-2008, 07:03 PM
  #115  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I obviuosly see it very differently and to me it was a kamikaze move, one that should be penalized for poor judgement during a bunched up race start.

This move was by a racer that has driven the track and should now the track squeezes a bit at the start/finish. What he should have done is step a bit on his brake, not whip his car in front of an overtaking car to his left and then place himself into a squeeze play between Mark A.'s 928 and the wall.

And the video car rear ending the other is also a no no. But I have to say from the video it's not really apparent the video car rear ended the squeezed car, it seems as if the squeezed car runs into (rubs) the nose of the video car as he tries to get in front.

I really can't see how Mark A. deserves what he got when these two racers who caused the ruckus are getting away free.

Just my opinion,
Constantine


Originally Posted by zekgb
I don't take the squeezed car's move as anything more than a split second decision on the best way to avoid Mark's slowing car, it did not appear to me as some kamikaze passing attempt. I don't think he had much control over the car once he gets hit from behind, and as I said earlier (and thought in real time even before seeing the video) the yellow car's jump on the start and contact with the squeezed car is the real cause of the wreck.
Old 08-26-2008, 07:12 PM
  #116  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

How come i cant see the rear ender??? It looks like it was close, but no contact.

mk



Originally Posted by Constantine
I obviuosly see it very differently and to me it was a kamikaze move, one that should be penalized for poor judgement during a bunched up race start.

This move was by a racer that has driven the track and should now the track squeezes a bit at the start/finish. What he should have done is step a bit on his brake, not whip his car in front of an overtaking car to his left and then place himself into a squeeze play between Mark A.'s 928 and the wall.

And the video car rear ending the other is also a no no. But I have to say from the video it's not really apparent the video car rear ended the squeezed car, it seems as if the squeezed car runs into (rubs) the nose of the video car as he tries to get in front.

I really can't see how Mark A. deserves what he got when these two racers who caused the ruckus are getting away free.

Just my opinion,
Constantine
Old 08-26-2008, 07:15 PM
  #117  
zekgb
Three Wheelin'
 
zekgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,794
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Mark there definitely was a hit, there were bits of yellow spoiler littered all over the place. In real time from the tower it looked like a chain reaction, not like car gets rear ended, drives away and then has a second incident.
Old 08-26-2008, 07:15 PM
  #118  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

maybe its him hitting the walll. I havent watched it with sound in a while. sounds like, and from his steering inputs, its running against the wall!

mk

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I dont know what tape you are looking at, but no one got hit from behind.
anderson got hit on the side and the car getting pinched got some damage on both sides.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Ac3cNjn-JUw

MK
Old 08-26-2008, 07:15 PM
  #119  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mark, I agree, but those that were there saw pieces of the video car on the track and believe the video car ran into the other.

Be careful out there,
Constantine
Old 08-26-2008, 07:23 PM
  #120  
zekgb
Three Wheelin'
 
zekgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,794
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

When are Joe and Mark going to weigh in here anyway?


Quick Reply: Laguna Seca this weekend



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:53 AM.