Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Holber race car gets a new engine. Progress Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2008, 05:13 PM
  #241  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

The GT vs S3 cam comparsion shows that the GT at the same crank angle is now in the accelerated angulation of the lobe for the 20 degree crank movement. that makes sense. However, this doesnt explain the difference in the differences of distance for cam settings between 928 models. GTs .3mm, S4 .2mm, 85s .4mm (differences betweek passenger and Driver)

So, Im not too worried about it, as i did a lot of these tests and measurements with the holbert car after the cam change.

since it worked on that car, i trust it will work on this one. as a note, the holbert cams were more GT like in the sense that they had an intake cam more advanced than the intake on the 85s. BUT, they were both timed from the factory at 2mm for 20 degrees crank movement.

as another note, my compression for all cylinders were all right around 190psi, with the driver side having the highest compression by a couple of PSI. High was 195 and the lowest was 190. this was done hot.

mk

Originally Posted by PorKen
Oops, 1.05 mm is not right, here are the precise measurements for 2°.

Top row of 32V'r holes - 1.408 mm

Bottom row of 32V'r holes - 1.384 mm

Top of belt (74.5 mm from cam center) - 1.298 mm


Remember, GT intake cams are advanced 8° versus S³ (open at 3° ATDC) so you are checking at a different lobe thickness.

S³ and S4 intake valves open at the same point, 11° ATDC. GTS open a little later, 13° ATDC, and the (cold) difference between banks is .25 mm.

Checking (with the 32V'r at TDC#1) with a hot engine is the ideal.
Old 08-13-2008, 05:41 PM
  #242  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Louie928
A suggestion.... Don't get too wound around the axle on the initial cam timing settings. Ball park is good enough now. Once the engine is running, and the rings sealed, take compression with the engine hot. Both sides should be the same. The side with higher compression has cams advanced (intake valve closing sooner) with respect to the cams on the other side. You can use Ken's tool to take a reference cam timing setting when you get equal compression. After that, use Ken's tool to advance, or retard both sides an equal amount to get the torque curve you want. Mark is expert at figuring torque under the curve between the shift points he wants. Time the cams to get the best compromise for those shift points. I'd anticipate, he'll want his cams set 5 or more degrees retarded from the WSM specs.
Louie:

Thanks!
Old 08-13-2008, 05:54 PM
  #243  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,143
Received 384 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
The GT vs S3 cam comparsion shows that the GT at the same crank angle is now in the accelerated angulation of the lobe for the 20 degree crank movement. that makes sense. However, this doesnt explain the difference in the differences of distance for cam settings between 928 models. GTs .3mm, S4 .2mm, 85s .4mm (differences betweek passenger and Driver)
The GTS is .25 mm.

GTS, S4, and S3 cams all have different amounts of lift, and so have different ramps to reach that lift.

At 20°, each type will have a different lift measurement compared to the others, and each type will have a different lift measurement at 20° versus 22°.

Originally Posted by mark kibort
as another note, my compression for all cylinders were all right around 190psi, with the driver side having the highest compression by a couple of PSI.
So you're saying the driver's side is advanced...
Old 08-13-2008, 06:40 PM
  #244  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

No, im saying that all the cylinders were equal and by chance, one was a little higher, by 5psi. I think it was a random cylinder as 2% variation is pretty good for any engine.

again, why wouldnt the passenger side be higher if i had the cams indexed equal? Driver side was 2mm at 20degrees after tdc. By the way, the compression was the same with the holbert cams as well. The only time it wasnt, was when i skipped those 3 teeth in that world challenge race practice session.

mk

Originally Posted by PorKen

So you're saying the driver's side is advanced...
Old 08-13-2008, 07:28 PM
  #245  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Here is the old belt vs the new belt, both at proper tension
Attached Images   
Old 08-13-2008, 08:27 PM
  #246  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,143
Received 384 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
by the way, the block is now an 85, heads are S4 and cams are 85s . (while the block is a todd and tim stroker 6.4 liter)
...cometic gasket...

If in doubt, go with the 32V'r! The 32V'r measures the angular relationship of the exhaust cam to a fixed point on the head, like the water pump pointer does with the balancer. It does this regardless of belt length, or block/gasket/head thickness. As long as the cams are stock, IE. the LSA has not changed, the reading will always be what the factory intended. Period, stop, shhh.

Set the cams to:

¼ | ⅝ New belt, cold
-1 | 0

When the belt stretches, it will end up something close to:

¼ | ⅝ 1K mile belt, cold
-3 | -1

When hot, they will be -1°, which is a good starting point for max HP.

Going from +3° to -1°, I gained >15 rwhp, same dyno session. Remember, you lost 20 somewhere...

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Here is the old belt vs the new belt, both at proper tension
There is at least 1 mm of movement, there.

1.3mm at the belt surface = 2°. The tooth is 2.5 mm lower, so it takes even less.
Old 08-13-2008, 09:57 PM
  #247  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I heard a big Vroooom earlier................not already surely............Mark?
Old 08-14-2008, 02:12 AM
  #248  
Airflite40
Official Rennlist
Borat Impersonator
Rennlist Member
 
Airflite40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

ok ok enough of all this cam technical mumbo jumbo. Lets see some effin PICS!!!!!
Old 08-14-2008, 04:19 AM
  #249  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Mark hasn't reported in yet, but the motor is in the car. We are not getting more that 4-5 hours a night to work on it, so it will be a couple more days. It seems we became clutch num-nuts tonight as we spent most of the time after dopping the motor onto the mounts putting the clutch in, getting stuck on one step or another then restarting. First the shaft would go into the bearing, then the arm would not go over the ballcup. Then... Anyway, we've both done enough clutches that we were just stupid tonight. But that's done. Next, it's the headers from hell. Maybe we'll finish tomorrow night, but, believe it or not, I've slowed Mark down to a sane pace.

Last edited by Bill Ball; 08-17-2008 at 09:07 PM.
Old 08-14-2008, 04:27 AM
  #250  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

We worked on the F'n clutch 'til just a couple of hours ago. Like a couple of rookies, we forgot or ignored the need to put the clutch lever arm on the bushing first. we tried to do it so many different ways, i lost count. I think we did the equivilant of 4 full clutch jobs tonight!

The car has never beaten me, but tonight Ill call it a draw! Not much done EXCEPT, the STROKER ENGINE IS IN THE HOLBERT CAR, and the clutch is in and much of the wiring is ready to be plugged back in side.

The dreaded headers are next, and then the fun stuff. alternator console, radiator, solder a few broke connections, and put the colder plugs in.

Ive already backed out the fuel regulator by 1.5 turns, so it should be down to near stock fuel pressure.

Still a chance this thing might be lit by the weekend!

Bill has all the wide band O2 sensor equip so we can monitor what the car is doing through all of the WOT rpms. (when it is time to go WOT )

mk



Mk

Originally Posted by Airflite40
ok ok enough of all this cam technical mumbo jumbo. Lets see some effin PICS!!!!!
Old 08-14-2008, 08:47 AM
  #251  
Peter F
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Peter F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posts: 1,242
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Great work Mark and Bill

Can't wait to hear how it runs after this transplant.

/Peter
Old 08-14-2008, 09:13 AM
  #252  
marlinspike
Burning Brakes
 
marlinspike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 1,042
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Ive already backed out the fuel regulator by 1.5 turns, so it should be down to near stock fuel pressure.
OK, when you say fuel regulator...this thing is still CIS, right? Because if it is, the CO setting that's where the distributor is does close to nothing everywhere but at idle. The one to mess around with is the warm up regulator (once you unplug it and get one that has the vacuum enrichment if you don't already).
Old 08-14-2008, 09:25 AM
  #253  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marlinspike
OK, when you say fuel regulator...this thing is still CIS, right?
No
Old 08-14-2008, 09:51 AM
  #254  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Fuel injection baby!

Good job boys. Clutches can suck if you miss one step. I remember once when I forgot to put the guide tube on and then there was something else later... in and out 3 times before I finally got it right. I feel your pain.
Old 08-14-2008, 11:17 AM
  #255  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

the LH cars have a fuel pressure regulator, but the Holbert car has the risng rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator. 1-2 turns drops the pressure by near 20psi. (as i was up near 72psi with the 5 liter ) . with the 30 lb injectors, i think I wont need more than stock fuel pressure in the mid 50psi range.

It should idle and run like it did before, as we are not changing really anything other than the pump

mk


Originally Posted by marlinspike
OK, when you say fuel regulator...this thing is still CIS, right? Because if it is, the CO setting that's where the distributor is does close to nothing everywhere but at idle. The one to mess around with is the warm up regulator (once you unplug it and get one that has the vacuum enrichment if you don't already).


Quick Reply: Holber race car gets a new engine. Progress Report



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:56 AM.