Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 vs. todays competition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2005 | 09:01 AM
  #166  
Herr-Kuhn's Avatar
Herr-Kuhn
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Default

O/N...you never stop amazing me....your crankshaft losses are far higher than any pumping losses I will ever see and you can take that to the bank. Yes, it is a parasite as far as I am concerned. I see no ignorant use of the word, specifically in this joking context. You don't think there are extra loads on your crank?...now that is really funny. I've got documented proof of 20 years of turbo power and 60,000 miles on a 928 without issue. Before there was even a Vortech supercharger, there were turbo 928s...many of which are still going strong!

Hey, competition keeps us all at our best, doesn't it. O/N, think about your boost curve characteristics next time you drop the hammer... and remember, while you are watching the boost creep up in high gears...this is when the turbo powered car is already at full tilt. He'll proably be short shifting just to give you a snowball's chance
Old 09-28-2005 | 12:56 PM
  #167  
Old & New's Avatar
Old & New
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
From: Southern New England
Default

You always forget about that little lever we have to the right of the steering wheel... when it's time to go, I drop it a gear or two & I am never out of my power band. It's a different style of driving than with a turbo, so you may not be familiar with it, but don't knock it.

Please don't let this bump your testosterone, as your time is better spent in the garage than

Six months, though? Have mercy.
Old 09-28-2005 | 01:13 PM
  #168  
Jim Nowak's Avatar
Jim Nowak
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Hey BC...the Goldmember 3-spd A/T car made 355 ft-lbs and 265 HP on a 100F day. I'd fully expect 30-40 more hp on a cooler day,
The dyno should adjust the output for ambiant heat so that shoud not be a factor. However, the fact that you were making 355 lb-ft of tq but only 265 RWHP is a problem and is not something to brag about. The low RWHP in relation to the high tq would be indicative of an issue with timing, fuel, or poor compressor efficiency. Your torque must have dropped like a rock after 3500 rpm to have only 265 RWHP. Please post the dyno chart so we can see.
Old 09-28-2005 | 01:23 PM
  #169  
Old & New's Avatar
Old & New
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
From: Southern New England
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Nowak
Please post the dyno chart so we can see.



Not bloody likely.
Old 09-28-2005 | 04:18 PM
  #170  
Jim Nowak's Avatar
Jim Nowak
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Not bloody likely.
Maybe if we ask 100 more times........
Old 09-30-2005 | 02:42 PM
  #171  
m21sniper's Avatar
m21sniper
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Nowak
The dyno should adjust the output for ambiant heat so that shoud not be a factor. However, the fact that you were making 355 lb-ft of tq but only 265 RWHP is a problem and is not something to brag about. The low RWHP in relation to the high tq would be indicative of an issue with timing, fuel, or poor compressor efficiency. Your torque must have dropped like a rock after 3500 rpm to have only 265 RWHP. Please post the dyno chart so we can see.
That's indicitive that the car is turbocharged.

Look at the factory specs for a buick GN. In either intercooled or non-intercooled form the tq is significantly higher than the HP.

The same is true for the Ford Mustang SVO, and the little chrysler 2.2 turbo motors.



Quick Reply: 928 vs. todays competition



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:47 AM.