Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

944 heads on 16-valve 928s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2003, 09:13 PM
  #16  
Joe Ricard
Pro
 
Joe Ricard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gautier, Mississippi
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So Now all we need is a written procedure to do the swap. I got my eye on two 944 's with the engines still in them. Got the euro intake runners just need a throttle body. Hook us up man.
Old 12-23-2003, 12:24 AM
  #17  
Jim Nowak
Drifting
 
Jim Nowak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mark,

To support that kind of power, what size injectors do you think would be recommended?
Old 12-23-2003, 02:27 PM
  #18  
Jon F
Instructor
 
Jon F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pasadena, CA, USA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jim, what did you do with the cooling ports? Do you have pictures? Thanks!
Old 12-23-2003, 03:05 PM
  #19  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

As I recall Lucky Eckman (who with Bob Devore started DEVEK ) was the person responsible for the design and building of this engine and as has been mentioned before the project has taken a couple years to get to the current nearly finished state . This may be one of the first engines built in many years using J E aftermarket pistons with a "special coating" to run in the Alusil block . The reliability of the 104 mm pistons is a much bigger question than how difficult it was to fit 944 heads . Jim has been the very patient owner and sponsor of this project but I do not believe he was involved in the details .........
Old 12-23-2003, 05:44 PM
  #20  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

I think it would just be a matter of upping the fuel pressuer . recent investigation shows that with the two valve engines, and their two fuel regs, one can be plugged or the return line clamped off or plugged to increase fuel pressure. keep in mind stock pressure is around 33psi, while s4 pressures out of one simular fuel regulator, is 47psi.
could be a cheap fix for raising fuel pressure, and use an adjustable regulator with the clamp off for full adjustability.
I had stock injectors that were flowing enough to support 293hp at the wheels and fuel ratios in the 12:5 :1 range to redline

MK


Originally posted by Jim Nowak
Mark,

To support that kind of power, what size injectors do you think would be recommended?
Old 01-01-2004, 12:40 AM
  #21  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Mark K,

I believe the non-turbo (up thru 84) valves are samller than the turbo (85-on) heads for the 944/2 (951) Pretty sure about this, but not positive. I have heard elsewhere from others that the 951 heads were the hot items on the 928... and when my son and I were rebuilding his 87 951 and my 928 we were swapping parts all over the place for fun - yes, his heads fit (with modification for water passage in the front) my 4.5Liter 928 block. We were amazed as we rebuilt his motor how many part numbers in his engine started with 928... I really loved rubbing it in! But that is no surprise gievn the history of the two cars and their design dates.

Anyway, I ended up buying a set of the "big valve" Euro heads and cams from Mark A at 928 Intl instead, so I never pursued the 951 heads on my block any further. But it was certainly do-able without too much trouble.
Old 07-10-2007, 05:05 AM
  #22  
Formula94lt1
Racer
 
Formula94lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Seems like you would have to do a 180 on one of the 944 heads so it would face the correct direction on the opposite bank. I am curious , since the back of one cylinder head is now the front, how you attach a cam sprocket and such...
Old 07-10-2007, 05:27 AM
  #23  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

There are mounting points ready in heads AFAIK. Sprocket is only mounted to cam anyway and other stuff should fall into place relatively easily.

928 use same parts in many places on both heads. 944 engine is passenger side half of the 928 engine. If parts fit into 928 passenger side they will also fit in drivers side as long as their basic design hasn't been changed. Which should be case in two valve heads and in 2.5L 944 in general. 3L S2 and 968 is little different.
Old 07-10-2007, 09:45 AM
  #24  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,551
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,227 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
I believe the non-turbo (up thru 84) valves are samller than the turbo (85-on) heads for the 944/2 (951) Pretty sure about this, but not positive.
There is another forum right above this one that holds all kinds of answers

Try this:
https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-944-951-968-forum/329992-valve-size-question.html

The hot ticket would be 89 2.7 liter heads with 47mm intake valve's. If you are using stock 928 cams with a supercharged motor, no need to spend the extra coin on turbo heads.
Old 07-10-2007, 02:23 PM
  #25  
a4sfed928
Pro
 
a4sfed928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Summerville SC
Posts: 595
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
There is another forum right above this one that holds all kinds of answers

Try this:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=329992

The hot ticket would be 89 2.7 liter heads with 47mm intake valve's. If you are using stock 928 cams with a supercharged motor, no need to spend the extra coin on turbo heads.

Can you elaborate on this...?
Old 07-10-2007, 02:49 PM
  #26  
Formula94lt1
Racer
 
Formula94lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

"There are mounting points ready in heads AFAIK. Sprocket is only mounted to cam anyway and other stuff should fall into place relatively easily.

928 use same parts in many places on both heads. 944 engine is passenger side half of the 928 engine. If parts fit into 928 passenger side they will also fit in drivers side as long as their basic design hasn't been changed. Which should be case in two valve heads and in 2.5L 944 in general. 3L S2 and 968 is little different."

Whats special about the 3.0L 968 stuff that would change anything? Wouldnt these heads be the way to go if it was possible assuming a large enough bore? Variocam!
Old 07-10-2007, 03:09 PM
  #27  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,551
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,227 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a4sfed928
Can you elaborate on this...?
On what? Not using turbo heads?

Per Special Tool in post #7: turbo heads have stiffer valve springs.
We also know they have sodium filled exahust valve's and coated exhaust ports (to protect against turbo heat). So with stock cams and no turbo, why spend the money on turbo heads when you get the same port & valve size with any other 944 head - except the 89's.

IMO you will spend just as much trying to modify 944 heads to work on a street car as buying EuroS heads. On a track car where you don't plan on using a heater core, the install becomes much easier.

I'm assuming you need an S4 coolant bridge with this setup.
Old 07-10-2007, 04:47 PM
  #28  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Formula94lt1
Whats special about the 3.0L 968 stuff that would change anything? Wouldnt these heads be the way to go if it was possible assuming a large enough bore? Variocam!
3L blocks and heads have one water channel in different location.

944 S2 block on left, 944 Turbo on right. Heads are 928 S3 meaning they have same water channels as all two valve heads.



Notice how head doesn't cover water area on block on drivers side front corner.









968 heads are not needed for Variocam. Its not easy but its doable into 928 32V heads too. See what Sterling has done. There is a lot of reading in archives.
Old 07-10-2007, 08:46 PM
  #29  
Formula94lt1
Racer
 
Formula94lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I take it S3 heads are the 85-86 32v heads, so I guess s4 and up blocks and heads are specific to their own? Are those more similar to the 968 heads?
Old 07-10-2007, 10:30 PM
  #30  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

944 heads fit 928, but you need the cam tower also and have to weld the head. We have a few sets in stock with cam towers, rebuilt and ready to ship. I also have one set of turbo 944 heads ready to go.

We have shipped many of our custom coated pistons with only one piston/bore failure due to over fueling.. a single bore. We will now only use this coating for our own builds.

We discontinued the selling the coating due to liability and other issues associated with selling custom coated pistons. Lucky will build no more, neither will I except as noted above. Lucky built the engine, and did not and will not do the tuning.

Cheers,
Marc


Quick Reply: 944 heads on 16-valve 928s?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:36 AM.