Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3D Printing 924 & 944 Parts - Development and Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2016, 01:16 PM
  #151  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,772
Received 66 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Yes, those recesses house hardened washers and bearings. Stay tuned!
Old 08-17-2016, 11:59 PM
  #152  
944 Lachlan
Racer
 
944 Lachlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

What about a plug for the inspection port on the bottom of the bell housing? By the clutch cylinder?
Old 08-18-2016, 07:26 PM
  #153  
KVDR
Pro
Thread Starter
 
KVDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 678
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Printed the coupler using three different materials, ABS plus two others I've never had the chance to try.

From left to right: OE coupler, ABS print, N-Gen co-polyester, Polycarbonate ABS


The N-Gen (blue) produced a VERY attractive print. Excellent surface finish, feels glossy and premium. Easy to print, and no post processing required.

The PC-ABS felt a bit heavier than the ABS print.


The actual loads these will see from the shifter are quite low.


I decided to do some destructive testing using torsion. The bolt permanently deformed before the coupling failed.


ABS split between layers. I was really quite surprised how much force it took before this happened. Not a catastrophic failure either - this would probably still function if re-installed in the linkage, although, with more play than before.


The N-Gen co-polyester failed almost immediately under minimal load. ABS left showing failure between layers vs N-Gen shattering across layers.


Brittle failure, it essentially shattered and crumbled in my hands. I will not be using this material for any load bearing parts. I included this shot because it shows the 2mm shell thickness with 20% infill.


PC-ABS failed in a similar fashion to ABS, but took quite a bit more force before it did.

It took considerable force with leverage to break the ABS and PC-ABS printed couplings. PC-ABS is a bit pricey vs ABS, and I don't think the results from this test warrant the higher cost for this item.

We'll use ABS going forward. I'm going to print at least two more samples, increasing shell thickness and/or fill density. I want the final result to feel as good as the OE part.
The following users liked this post:
jjbunn (10-06-2019)
Old 08-18-2016, 07:31 PM
  #154  
KVDR
Pro
Thread Starter
 
KVDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 678
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944 Lachlan
What about a plug for the inspection port on the bottom of the bell housing? By the clutch cylinder?
I could probably do this - I'll take measurements next time I get it on the hoist.
Old 08-18-2016, 08:26 PM
  #155  
Jay Wellwood
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Jay Wellwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hotlanta - NE of the Perimeter
Posts: 12,269
Received 266 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Have you considered freezing the ABS then seeing how it performs under load?

While not many cars will be driven in freezing weather, this could offer meaningful information given this application is under load and would be exposed (in theory) to colder temperatures.
Old 08-18-2016, 08:34 PM
  #156  
KVDR
Pro
Thread Starter
 
KVDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 678
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay Wellwood
Have you considered freezing the ABS then seeing how it performs under load?

While not many cars will be driven in freezing weather, this could offer meaningful information given this application is under load and would be exposed (in theory) to colder temperatures.
I'll try it out!
Old 08-18-2016, 11:59 PM
  #157  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,772
Received 66 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

I've been chatting with KVDR about producing a DIY linkage rebuild kit that would utilize these printed couplers along with roller bearings and new hardware. Is there any interest, in the $40-50 price region? The aftermarket SSK linkages are another solution but are a little more expensive and these retain an OEM throw.
Old 08-19-2016, 01:44 AM
  #158  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Maybe increase the infill percentage too...?
Old 08-20-2016, 08:08 AM
  #159  
CVR_Rally
Pro
 
CVR_Rally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 646
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Once piece that might be worth while to try is the HVAC cover that always cracks when you remove it.
Old 08-20-2016, 12:20 PM
  #160  
Jay Wellwood
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Jay Wellwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hotlanta - NE of the Perimeter
Posts: 12,269
Received 266 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odonnell
I've been chatting with KVDR about producing a DIY linkage rebuild kit that would utilize these printed couplers along with roller bearings and new hardware. Is there any interest, in the $40-50 price region? The aftermarket SSK linkages are another solution but are a little more expensive and these retain an OEM throw.
If they prove durable, I'd be in.
Old 08-20-2016, 02:24 PM
  #161  
KVDR
Pro
Thread Starter
 
KVDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 678
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay Wellwood
If they prove durable, I'd be in.
The destructive testing shown above was extreme and used torsional forces that would be impossible to recreate using the shifter in the car, and the couplings destroyed were printed with a really low infill at 20% (shown below)



A higher infill % will greatly increase part strength for long term durability.

More to follow...
Old 08-21-2016, 01:10 AM
  #162  
azbanks
Freedom Enthusiast
Rennlist Member
 
azbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Maybe increase the infill percentage too...?
Originally Posted by KVDR
The destructive testing shown above was extreme and used torsional forces that would be impossible to recreate using the shifter in the car, and the couplings destroyed were printed with a really low infill at 20% (shown below)



A higher infill % will greatly increase part strength for long term durability.

More to follow...
20% seemed really low to me.
Old 08-22-2016, 04:51 PM
  #163  
KVDR
Pro
Thread Starter
 
KVDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 678
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

20% was good enough to get dimensions dialed in and compare the strengths of three different materials.

Here's an ABS print that stopped last night for no good reason. G-Code error?



Anyway, this is 80% infill and 3mm shell. It is perfectly tight with the shifter linkages. I think 2mm shell will be better.

I am printing a final version for Odonnell now.
Old 08-22-2016, 07:07 PM
  #164  
Jay Wellwood
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Jay Wellwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hotlanta - NE of the Perimeter
Posts: 12,269
Received 266 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Looking good.
Old 08-22-2016, 09:12 PM
  #165  
curtisr
Rennlist Member
 
curtisr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,716
Received 76 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

I'd really like to see a "solid" dashboard speaker cover that I could use for a couple of additional gauges.


Quick Reply: 3D Printing 924 & 944 Parts - Development and Discussion



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:42 AM.