Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Por-Vettes - Ok I'm a believer now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2012, 11:47 AM
  #46  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MAGK944
Are you saying the GM aluminum V8 is lighter than the 944na aluminum 4-cyl. Sorry but I cannot see how this would be possible.
Most people do not realize just how huge the 944 engine is compared to other 4-bangers of similar displacement.

For a comparison, look at the 928 motor which is the same physical size of a 502 Chevy big block. Aluminum or not, that is a lot of material.

Add to that an overhead valve arrangement which adds even more weight.
Old 04-10-2012, 06:48 PM
  #47  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

btw, a complete LS1 being pulled from a wreck to be shipped,

including the serpentine, ac, fuel rails and ecm weighs in at just about 470 pounds.



most guys doing their swaps don't run ac, so there's some weight savings right there.....



the 944 S2 crank is possibly the heaviest 4 cylinder crank on earth, weighing in at just about 60 pounds !!


even more than the (equal weight) of corn syrup i consume each year.
Old 04-10-2012, 07:16 PM
  #48  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Its a matter of technologically advanced porsche vs mobile ancient technology parts bin.

There are a lot of chasis that LS compliments nice, but in porsche it is just blasphemy.

Porsche is the most dominant name in car racing history and not one of victories was won with GM engine. Strange. They would probably won even more if they just used good ol push rod v8 design from 1920.

This is a nice car for LS engine:

Old 04-10-2012, 07:26 PM
  #49  
brad@tirerack.com
Former Vendor
 
brad@tirerack.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UltimatE157
A car that small with that much HP and weight over the front axle .... Not a fun car to drive IMO. A v8 replacing a small I4 engine. There was a guy installing an LSx into a miata at a local shop a few years ago, never saw the finished product though.
From their site:

The math is simple. Little car plus big engine = high performance. The trick is putting the big engine in without spoiling the little car.

We've teamed up with the experts at V8 Roadsters to offer a kit that mates the amazing GM Gen III/Gen IV - or "LS" - family of engines to a 1990-05 Miata. The engine is a beauty that ranges in size from 5.3 to 6.3 liters and makes a minimum of 300 hp and 300 ft-lbs with a wide range of upgrades available. We mate it to a strong T56 6-speed transmission that offers a nice tight gate and an extremely relaxed cruising gear. The rear end is an aluminum-bodied limited slip unit from the Cadillac CTS, with a custom driveshaft, new rear hubs and high-strength axles. Engine management is handled by the stock GM unit, which is easily reprogrammed and can return OBD-II codes.

To mount the engine, we have a fabricated tubular subframe that's 10 lbs lighter than stock. The transmission is supported by a brace that also reinforces the frame rails for extra rigidity. The engine is set back as far as possible to optimize the weight distribution, and some modifications are required to the engine bay and transmission tunnel. The Miata power steering is retained and you can use A/C and the front sway bar.

Overall, the car gains less than 200 lbs with 1/3 of that on the rear wheels. In other words, the car does not become a nose-heavy beast. To put things in perspective, one of our SuperFour Challenge turbo Miatas came in at almost exactly the same weight and distribution. From the outside, the car looks completely stock. The ground clearance is unchanged and nothing needs to be altered on the body. As long as the engine is off, it's a great sleeper. But once you fire it up, there's no mistaking what's underhood.

Does it handle? Well, the first time we took one autocrossing, we set FTD with it - by a margin of nearly 4 seconds. We've destroyed our own lap records around our local track, outrunning purpose-built race Miatas with a street-oriented V8 Miata. Yeah, it handles.
Old 04-10-2012, 07:49 PM
  #50  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robstah

I have tried to stall my V8 swap. It's almost impossible in 1st and 2nd. I rarely have to downshift.

Originally Posted by chrisc

You guys are going to really like the results!

Imagine what Porsche could have done with this platform if they really wanted to invest in it


@ 388 cubic inches...

how 'bout being able to gently let out the clutch slowly w/out touching the gas and not stall the car?


that would be a hoot !
Old 04-10-2012, 07:54 PM
  #51  
supes6
Racer
 
supes6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My swap is coming along, hoping to fire the engine up in the new few weeks. You really have to see it to believe the amount of extra space that opens up with the LS1 in there. Overall it's just a much easier engine to work on - you don't have to remove 10 things to get to the part you're trying to replace like on the porsche engine.
Attached Images  
Old 04-10-2012, 08:07 PM
  #52  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith

Its a matter of technologically morbid porsche vs modern chevy technology parts bin.

There are a lot of chasis that LS compliments nicely and the Porsche 944/968 is no exception.

proven over and over. the engine even looks like it was installed at the factory.

fixed it for you, just in case you ever decide to come over to the right side...



Originally Posted by supes6

My swap is coming along....

effing awesome !!

frankly i'm shocked by the number of new swap projects that i'm hearing about the past few days.

what a difference a couple of years makes.
Old 04-10-2012, 08:32 PM
  #53  
rgs944
Drifting
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The 968 is so damn fun to drive right now, but I have to say that if my engine ever gave I would sure consider doing it.
Old 04-10-2012, 09:32 PM
  #54  
Lemming
Nordschleife Master
 
Lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Posts: 6,426
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
btw, a complete LS1 being pulled from a wreck to be shipped, including the serpentine, ac, fuel rails and ecm weighs in at just about 470 pounds.
My LS1 with alternator and full clutch assembly was 437. I do not run a power steering pump and had not yet put oil in the system.
Attached Images   
Old 04-10-2012, 09:48 PM
  #55  
968 GUY
Racer
 
968 GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ga.
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"remove 10 things to get to the part you're trying to replace like on the porsche engine. "

HATE when that happens !
Old 04-10-2012, 10:02 PM
  #56  
Lemming
Nordschleife Master
 
Lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Posts: 6,426
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robstah
That's what I am talking about. I can just lift off of the clutch in 1st and the car just goes. Doesn't bog, doesn't stall. It just goes.
Mine lurches, but I do have a Spec Stage III 6-puck clutch and light weight flywheel installed
Old 04-10-2012, 10:28 PM
  #57  
Jrboulder
Rennlist Member
 
Jrboulder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Its a matter of technologically advanced porsche vs mobile ancient technology parts bin.

There are a lot of chasis that LS compliments nice, but in porsche it is just blasphemy.

Porsche is the most dominant name in car racing history and not one of victories was won with GM engine. Strange. They would probably won even more if they just used good ol push rod v8 design from 1920.
The 911 engine is a direct evoloution from the VW beetle engine. Produced 1936-present
(Read The 911 Story for proof)

The Lycoming and Continental aircraft engines have been in production in a very similar form since the thirties. The O-145 started in 1938.

The Chevy small block was in production cars 1955-2003 and is still made as a replacement part.

The M28 and M44 Porsche motors were produced 1977-1995, a total of 18 years. By the time production ceased they were outdated, overstreched, uneconomical to produce, and overly complex.

Good things stand the test of time.
Old 04-11-2012, 11:48 PM
  #58  
Sasquatch
Instructor
 
Sasquatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Considering the same swap for my 87na. I have a couple of questions.

1. Brakes. How do you deal with a lack of vacuum booster on the brake system? What is the fix?

2. AC. This will be a street driven car and will not do without PS and AC. By going with the LS1, will the ac and ps pumps fit and plumb up?

Thanks for the good information.
Old 04-12-2012, 12:04 AM
  #59  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

1) The options are manual brakes, hydroboost, an electric brake booster or using individual master cylinders for the front / rear

2) A/C can be retained, basically you use the GM compressor mated to the rest of the Porsche system

PS works aswell, the stock GM pump can be used if doing it on the cheap.
Old 04-12-2012, 09:18 AM
  #60  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jrboulder
The 911 engine is a direct evoloution from the VW beetle engine. Produced 1936-present
(Read The 911 Story for proof)

The Lycoming and Continental aircraft engines have been in production in a very similar form since the thirties. The O-145 started in 1938.

The Chevy small block was in production cars 1955-2003 and is still made as a replacement part.

The M28 and M44 Porsche motors were produced 1977-1995, a total of 18 years. By the time production ceased they were outdated, overstreched, uneconomical to produce, and overly complex.

Good things stand the test of time.
This watch is almost perfect. It only has one major flaw, it is overcomplicated. And it is based on old technology.



So the best solution is to jerk out the stupid morbid engine and slap in a nice modern digital timepiece that never misses.. What a very exciting and accurate hybrid that would be. If the first one wouldn't be so expensive, Id made one and give it to Ourundandina for birthday.



Quick Reply: Por-Vettes - Ok I'm a believer now



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:44 AM.