When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Turbo is a lot of fun, insanely fast. Chasing 100-200kph numbers on that car is really of zero interest to us though… The N/A stuff on the other hand
JC
What do u think the 992 will run with all the mods? High 6?
Also its funny you know the 100-200 of the turbo since its of zero interest. 🤣 But in all seriousness the modded turbo *drag racing* world is a huge wormhole and i agree not worth it. I would love to own one of those the way u have it set up. Only problem is i would be in jail 100%
Last edited by Rennolazine; 02-21-2022 at 09:14 PM.
What do u think the 992 will run with all the mods? High 6?
Also its funny you know the 100-200 of the turbo since its of zero interest. 🤣 But in all seriousness the modded turbo *drag racing* world is a huge wormhole and i agree not worth it. I would love to own one of those the way u have it set up. Only problem is i would be in jail 100%
I would say comfortably mid 6, possibly a touch faster based on where we're at already. Issue is that creating a thread for the 992 GT3 is that most have already tuned their cars which isn't something anyone in the UK is really interested in doing, dealers are super hot on it hence why all of our development is completed on stock ECU tune.
The Turbo I just had to throw it in there. No interest in chasing times but certainly interested to put a number to the sensation of speed it delivers
JC
__________________
WE'RE NO LONGER ACTIVE ON THE RENNLIST FORUMS - FOR ALL ENQUIRIES PLEASE CONTACT US VIA THE JCR WEBSITE BELOW
I would say comfortably mid 6, possibly a touch faster based on where we're at already. Issue is that creating a thread for the 992 GT3 is that most have already tuned their cars which isn't something anyone in the UK is really interested in doing, dealers are super hot on it hence why all of our development is completed on stock ECU tune.
The Turbo I just had to throw it in there. No interest in chasing times but certainly interested to put a number to the sensation of speed it delivers
JC
Yes i agree its complex, but its all in the name of science. I dont think its a big deal as long as we capture all the bolt ons and software mods. The other thing i suspect is that bolt ons have a larger impact than tuning for NA. I personally dont plan on tuning mine but im sure other guys will go full ape with tunes and intake, possibly fuels. It would be interesting to see how much each of those is worth. None of these will touch the turbo cars in terms of acceleration thats for sure. But mid 6 would be legit crazy fast. I think stock the 992 runs high 7
LEADERBOARD- I will update as the results roll in...
100-200 kph Best stock 8.45 sec, @JCviggen , GT4 manual, slope -0.9 degrees, DA 120 (post #195 for slip) 8.85 sec @Rennolazine , spyder manual, DA 62m, +0.6 degrees slope (post #49 for slip) 9.24 sec, @TOY4S , GTS 4.0 PDK, DA-233m (post #34 for slip) 9.63 sec, @JCR-Porsche GT4 manual (post #6 for slip) 9.71 sec, @K-Nut Spyder manual, roof down, DA +1014m (post #30 for slip)
Best Modded - Bolt ons 7.47 sec, @JCR-Porsche Gt4 manual, JCR inconel manifolds, 200 cell cats, titanium race pipe, BBS-FI-R, carbon hood, clubsport aero, surface transforms rotors, pro racing driver, -0.52 degrees slope, DA -116m (post # 101 for slip) 7.85 sec, @JCviggen GT4 manual, Soul race headers, Supersprint OAPs, Soul valved exhaust. Good DA. (post # 207 for slip) 7.95 sec, @Rennolazine Spyder manual, BC Fabs street headers with 200 cell cats, stock muffler, -0.12 degrees slope, DA -22m (post #163 for slip). 8.07 sec, @Jamie@dundonmotorsports GT4 manual, Dundon street headers with 200 cell cats, stock muffler, AP steel brakes, MC dampers, pro racing driver, -0.8 degrees slope, DA -29m (post #73 for slip) 8.14 sec, @Macker GT4 PDK, Dundon street headers with 200 cel cats, stock muffler, +0.34 degrees slope, DA 5m (post #43 for slip) 8.36 sec. @JCR-Porsche GT4 manual, Full exhaust, catless inconel manifolds, opf delete, titanium race pipe, stock wheels, +0.68 degrees slope, DA 482m (post #6 for slip) 8.43 sec. @Rennolazine Spyder manual, BC Fabs inconel valved/silenced rear pipe, stock headers/opf, -0.68 degrees slope, DA 40m (post #66 for slip)
60-130 MPH Best stock 10.33 sec, @JCviggen , GT4 manual, DA 384 ft (post #195 for slip) 10.58 sec @Rennolazine, Spyder manual, DA -689 ft (post #42 for slip)
Best Modded - Bolt ons 9.11 sec,@JCviggenGT4 manual, Soul race headers, Supersprint OAPs, Soul valved exhaust Good DA (post # 207 for slip) 9.33 sec, @Rennolazine Spyder manual, BC Fabs street headers with 200 cell cats, stock muffler, -0.69 degrees slope, DA -4ft (post #152 for slip). 9.41 sec, @Jamie@dundonmotorsports GT4 manual, Dundon street headers with 200 cell cats, stock muffler, AP radical steel brakes, MC dampers, pro racing driver, -0.74 degrees slope, DA -95 ft (post #73 for slip) 9.71 sec, @Rennolazine Spyder manual, BC Fabs inconel valved/silenced rear pipe, stock headers/opf, -0.88 degrees slope, DA 182 ft (post #66 for slip).
0-60 mph Best stock 3.71 sec, @TOY4S , GTS 4.0 PDK, DA -700 ft (post #32 for slip) 3.75 sec, @KBS911, GT4 PDK, uphill bigtime (post #28 for slip)
Best Modded 1.
2.
0-100 kph Best stock
Best Modded 1.
2.
1/4 mile Best stock 11.81 @117.66, @TOY4S, GTS 4.0 PDK, (post#32 for slip)
Best Modded 1.
2.
Lets go! ...
A bit of advice for the spyder/boxster guys. Your car is slower with the roof down. Saving you some time.
Would it make sense adding if Draggy users were using external GPS.
Phone GP systems are probably less accurate.
Dragy always uses its own high-speed/high-accuracy GPS. That's what the device is. It does not use the phone for measurement..
Oh, I'm sorry, I though these measurements were made with a phone app. I guess I didn't pay enough attention.
In the meantime I was able to measure my time with a Racebox.
100-200 km/h
9:01 (corrected 8.79 - 0,8% slope).
718 GT4. Everything stock. Manual.
The slips I'm adding here show my Dragy times before and after switching the rear box from the OEM one to the JCR silenced race pipes. I have a density altitude (DA) higher than many here at 1140 feet (347m) which will certainly give me slower times than the closer to sea-level readings earlier in the thread. The real take away is that given the times I can get at this given altitude, you can see a notable improvement in times with the new exhaust.
The temperature was close to the same before (69F) and after (63F). The flat stretch of road I ran on was exactly the same both times. All runs were recorded as Valid. There are no other changes to the car and both times I did this with about a half tank of gas.
These screen shots were edited only to attach the history at the bottom from the Leaderboard view.The history shows the difference in times before and after the JCR rear section change. All in all the improvement was better than I expected and the sound is just what I was looking for too; not loud or harsh but a more pronounced and exotic tone - I find it hard to find the right words to describe it.
Edit: Added quarter mile data - A whopping 0.41 second improvement!
Last edited by StormRune; 03-12-2023 at 10:04 AM.
Reason: Added quarter mile
The slips I'd adding here show my Dragy times before and after switching the rear box from the OEM one to the JCR silenced race pipes. I have a density altitude (DA) higher than many here at 1140 feet (347m) which will certainly give me slower times than the closer to sea-level readings earlier in the thread. The real take away is that given the times I can get at this given altitude, you can see a notable improvement in times with the new exhaust.
The temperature was close to the same before (69F) and after (63F). The flat stretch of road I ran on was exactly the same both times. All runs were recorded as Valid. There are no other changes to the car and both times I did this with about a half tank of gas.
These screen shots were edited only to attach the history at the bottom from the Leaderboard view.The history shows the difference in times before and after the JCR rear section change. All in all the improvement was better than I expected and the sound is just what I was looking for too; not loud or harsh but a more pronounced and exotic tone - I find it hard to find the right words to describe it.
Wait, I thought JCR rear silencers lose at least 10hp???!!!
02-21-2022, 09:10 PM
