Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RE71-R for GT3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:59 PM
  #31  
m3irish
Racer
 
m3irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuntman
TireRack has some of the most detailed information on tires across all brands than any other source out there. It's unbelievable that they use a standard measuring practice for the section (and especially) tread widths that they do to EVERY make, model, and size they offer.

This is a MUST-READ to better understand the aspects of a tire and how to properly size them for a given rim width:

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...RFORMANCE.aspx


0.02
I may have improperly expressed that the data from the TR is poor and I don't meant that. What I meant to say is that the data is not a measure of correctness or safety.

Great link to a good baseline to run on. Going beyond you need to put different tires on different width wheels to see what feels good and whats fast knowing the two might be mutually exclusive or one in the same.
Old 10-15-2016, 02:49 AM
  #32  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Adjusted the front sway bars stiff on the GT3 today for Laguna Seca. The car ran 1:37.5, which is the fastest the car has gone at this track, but there is still a bit of midcorner oversteer. I think adjusting the rear bar to full soft will fix remaining oversteer. I'm feeling pretty good that I can get this rear 295 RE71R to work.

There are some setup issues that still I need to work through. The 1:37.5 was with Ben at the wheel of the car. Later in the day I got in the car and I could only get 1:39.0. I then hopped in someone else's GT3 with full stiff front and soft rear and the car felt much better to me and I ended up with 1:38.1 in someone else's car while having to lift for sound since this car didnt have the GPS device. Meanwhile Ben was chasing me in our own car and could only get 1:38.8.

Last edited by orthojoe; 10-15-2016 at 10:09 AM.
Old 10-15-2016, 09:26 AM
  #33  
stuntman
Instructor
 
stuntman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 243
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m3irish
I may have improperly expressed that the data from the TR is poor and I don't meant that. What I meant to say is that the data is not a measure of correctness or safety.

Great link to a good baseline to run on. Going beyond you need to put different tires on different width wheels to see what feels good and whats fast knowing the two might be mutually exclusive or one in the same.
Without spending weeks worth of testing and tens of thousands of dollars on tires, coming from someone who has, I think the "general rule of thumb" (in the article) for choosing a tread width that's the same, to 0.5" narrower than the wheel width almost always will yield the best feel, response, and performance for that tire width.
Old 10-15-2016, 09:38 AM
  #34  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,454
Received 3,803 Likes on 2,200 Posts
Default

Here's Tire Rack info for three variants of the Cup 2 in 305/30-20. Note the large range in tread width, and based on Stuntman's guideline, the 12" wheel is fine, whereas an 11.5" wheel may be too narrow.


Old 10-15-2016, 09:49 AM
  #35  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,454
Received 3,803 Likes on 2,200 Posts
Default

Anyone here tried the ContiForce Contact? There's a favorable review of it on Tire Rack from a 991 GT3 owner:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....RatingsReviews
Old 10-15-2016, 10:09 AM
  #36  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Anyone here tried the ContiForce Contact? There's a favorable review of it on Tire Rack from a 991 GT3 owner:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....RatingsReviews
I haven't, but a friend has. Says they were ok. Pricing is similar, from what I remember to cup2.

We may be seeing more things from continental since they recently purchased Hoosier tire
Old 10-15-2016, 02:51 PM
  #37  
mqandil
Rennlist Member
 
mqandil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,221
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Adjusted the front sway bars stiff on the GT3 today for Laguna Seca. The car ran 1:37.5, which is the fastest the car has gone at this track, but there is still a bit of midcorner oversteer. I think adjusting the rear bar to full soft will fix remaining oversteer. I'm feeling pretty good that I can get this rear 295 RE71R to work.

There are some setup issues that still I need to work through. The 1:37.5 was with Ben at the wheel of the car. Later in the day I got in the car and I could only get 1:39.0. I then hopped in someone else's GT3 with full stiff front and soft rear and the car felt much better to me and I ended up with 1:38.1 in someone else's car while having to lift for sound since this car didnt have the GPS device. Meanwhile Ben was chasing me in our own car and could only get 1:38.8.
Joe this is impressive time. The only reason I asked you about your setting on the front bar because I too had some issues with exit oversteer and did discover stiffing the front bar helps but it did increase the understeer on the car which is why I asked you. However in my case I went back to the middle bar sitting on front, and instead increased the rear camber by an additional 0.5 degree so now it is slightly higher than the front. This really helped settle the back under power during corner exit. I did not notice big change to the understeer. It seems everyone is doing the opposite of that but for some reason in my car it worked great to settle the back. It could be just my driving style. Again thanks for the info. Mark
Old 10-15-2016, 02:59 PM
  #38  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mqandil
Joe this is impressive time. The only reason I asked you about your setting on the front bar because I too had some issues with exit oversteer and did discover stiffing the front bar helps but it did increase the understeer on the car which is why I asked you. However in my case I went back to the middle bar sitting on front, and instead increased the rear camber by an additional 0.5 degree so now it is slightly higher than the front. This really helped settle the back under power during corner exit. I did not notice big change to the understeer. It seems everyone is doing the opposite of that but for some reason in my car it worked great to settle the back. It could be just my driving style. Again thanks for the info. Mark
Thanks. Yes, it really is interesting how some people have totally opposite sway bar settings, which is why I always try to tell people not to copy what someone else is doing until you figure out what your own car is doing with you behind the wheel and adjust for yourself. The GT3 that I drove which wasn't mine had near stock alignment settings too, which makes me wonder...
Old 10-15-2016, 06:23 PM
  #39  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Thanks. Yes, it really is interesting how some people have totally opposite sway bar settings, which is why I always try to tell people not to copy what someone else is doing until you figure out what your own car is doing with you behind the wheel and adjust for yourself. The GT3 that I drove which wasn't mine had near stock alignment settings too, which makes me wonder...
You know the views I've started to form on this car Joe. It's pretty much as quick as it going to be out of the box on factory recommended settings. Everything else is for tyre wear/longevity only, and to be honest the 991 GT3 isn't bad in this respect - even on factory settings the front shoulders give up at about the time the heat cycles have affected the MPSC2 in any case (unless you are running the same track not flipping to even out wear).

To be honest if MPSC2 were made in USA instead of France and didn't carry the "N0" Porsche "tax" rating then they might be 40% cheaper than they are today - if that was the case I don't think id bother recommending anyone did anything with the settings out of the box, save your money for some headers and "just drive it".

Hopefully a few more mania furred will come to the fray and deliver s tyre that will work on this car at a lower price in 2017. Surely the Koreans see an opportunity here. Nitto, toyo or Hankook could really win some mind space with a fast R Comp in 20" sizes etc
Old 10-15-2016, 06:42 PM
  #40  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

"Mania furred" as above is not done kinky new Brazilian but "manufactured" corrected by silly Apple spell check. Editing it via the RL app on IPhone is painful as others have noted...
Old 10-16-2016, 01:10 AM
  #41  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
You know the views I've started to form on this car Joe. It's pretty much as quick as it going to be out of the box on factory recommended settings. Everything else is for tyre wear/longevity only, and to be honest the 991 GT3 isn't bad in this respect - even on factory settings the front shoulders give up at about the time the heat cycles have affected the MPSC2 in any case (unless you are running the same track not flipping to even out wear).

To be honest if MPSC2 were made in USA instead of France and didn't carry the "N0" Porsche "tax" rating then they might be 40% cheaper than they are today - if that was the case I don't think id bother recommending anyone did anything with the settings out of the box, save your money for some headers and "just drive it".

Hopefully a few more mania furred will come to the fray and deliver s tyre that will work on this car at a lower price in 2017. Surely the Koreans see an opportunity here. Nitto, toyo or Hankook could really win some mind space with a fast R Comp in 20" sizes etc
Oh yes. I'm a believer and agree with you, my friend
Old 10-16-2016, 03:50 AM
  #42  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,188
Received 1,150 Likes on 568 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Adjusted the front sway bars stiff on the GT3 today for Laguna Seca. The car ran 1:37.5, which is the fastest the car has gone at this track, but there is still a bit of midcorner oversteer. I think adjusting the rear bar to full soft will fix remaining oversteer. I'm feeling pretty good that I can get this rear 295 RE71R to work.

There are some setup issues that still I need to work through. The 1:37.5 was with Ben at the wheel of the car. Later in the day I got in the car and I could only get 1:39.0. I then hopped in someone else's GT3 with full stiff front and soft rear and the car felt much better to me and I ended up with 1:38.1 in someone else's car while having to lift for sound since this car didnt have the GPS device. Meanwhile Ben was chasing me in our own car and could only get 1:38.8.
So are you saying RE71 is a go?
Old 10-16-2016, 11:56 AM
  #43  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MaxLTV
So are you saying RE71 is a go?
In think so. However, be prepared to make adjustments to your sway bars in order to make it work.
For Ben, it's proven to be equally fast. I'm close to approving it, but I'm still not totally happy with midcorner and the car didn't feel nearly as good as Don's car. Ben could not keep up with me when I was driving don's car. Give me one more day to adjust the sway bar one more setting and I'll put out the verdict then. 11/5.
Old 10-16-2016, 01:28 PM
  #44  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,454
Received 3,803 Likes on 2,200 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
In think so. However, be prepared to make adjustments to your sway bars in order to make it work.
For Ben, it's proven to be equally fast. I'm close to approving it, but I'm still not totally happy with midcorner and the car didn't feel nearly as good as Don's car. Ben could not keep up with me when I was driving don's car. Give me one more day to adjust the sway bar one more setting and I'll put out the verdict then. 11/5.
Seems like the narrower rear tire is reducing rear grip, so the sway bars adjustments are restoring balance, but the net result is still less overall grip?
Old 10-16-2016, 01:45 PM
  #45  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Seems like the narrower rear tire is reducing rear grip, so the sway bars adjustments are restoring balance, but the net result is still less overall grip?
That is the question, but the car did run it's fastest lap ever even with the sway bar/setup not optimized yet.


Quick Reply: RE71-R for GT3?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:26 AM.