Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tesla existential threat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:05 PM
  #2521  
Lorenfb's Avatar
Lorenfb
Race Car
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 102
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by whiz944
Model Y ahead of schedule. May even see some production Semis next year.
Really? Notwithstanding China, where will the additional U.S. & ROW production come from, more tents in Fremont? Any more jokes for today?
Q3 deliveries (97K) versus Q2 (95K), YTD 255K, hardly exemplifies a "growth company", a long way to achieve a 2019 guidance of 400K.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:22 PM
  #2522  
Whoopsy's Avatar
Whoopsy
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 1,516
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Curious what you think Uber and WeWork's valuations should be then.

TSLA is a very different company than both WeWork and Uber. Elon keep trying to pivot TSLA as all sorts of different 'kind' of company, but at the end of the day, after everything, it's still a car company and that's it. Car industries is very capital intensive and the profit margin are not that great. There is no reasonable projection to see it worth what is is right now even after factoring all future possibilities. Tesla is here to stay, it won't go belly up, eventually the stock price will come back down to match reality though, and perhaps settle down on say a 10-15 P/E. Elon had always wanted to push it as a tech company and wanted the valuation like a tech company, it is sort of like that right now but the problem is Tesla isn't one. Nor is it a ride sharing company like Uber. It is just a car company, with more vertical integration. Tesla's growth the last few years was when they have the virtual monopoly in the market, going ahead that monopoly is gone and we shall see if it can switch gear and stay ahead, if they can, there is at least some form of valid argument to support a certain level of stock price, but that's hopes and dreams.

Uber's business model requires very little capital if at all, and there are many more cities for them to expand to. But still, it is perhaps 1/3 over priced right now even factoring future growth.

WeWork, let's just say we come back to it next year, IF it's still around.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:27 PM
  #2523  
daveo4porsche's Avatar
daveo4porsche
Nordschleife Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,488
Likes: 4,884
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
In addition to:
Faster supercharging
Elon lied again and claimed FSD feature will be complete by end of year
European gigafactory coming GF4
OTA update mentioned above will also increase range
Solar roof V3 reveal today
.


FIFY
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:30 PM
  #2524  
Needsdecaf's Avatar
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 9,362
Likes: 2,894
From: The Woodlands, TX.
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche

FIFY
Nah, it'll be "feature complete" by the end of the year.

You just need to keep changing the definition of "complete" and the list of "features".
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:30 PM
  #2525  
RonF's Avatar
RonF
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 457
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsy
TSLA stock price were never technically driven, it's all emotional. If it were, the price will be under $100 if that much.
So? You don't even know how the market works and the reason why those "analysts" could at best earn a salary instead of be a profitable investors themselves from those "technical" garbages? At this very moment half of all investors on the planet have reasons to believe the stock is worth $300 or more and the other half believe it should worth $300 or less. You can have all your reasons to believe whatever you want to believe but the market has its own magic way to determine value of a company.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:43 PM
  #2526  
whiz944's Avatar
whiz944
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 448
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
In addition to:
Faster supercharging
FSD feature complete by end of year
European gigafactory coming GF4
OTA update mentioned above will also increase range
Solar roof V3 reveal today

Which are all great but since TA is settling in and delivery/production hell has smoothed over, Tesla Energy (TE) is the real star of yesterdays ER.
As a shareholder, I'm more excited about its potential now that they can redirect their resources there instead of the Model 3 ramp up.
The storage business has MASSIVE upside. I am much less convinced by the solar piece. They should use the ex-Solar City factory in Rochester for something else - like maybe Semi trucks. They are already building their Supercharger equipment there.

The lack of questions related to service is also a good sign that the increase in SC's is starting to make a difference.
I certainly didn't expect the bump in demand and planned increases in production for Models S and X though. Just wait till Plaid mode hits the configurator.

It was also a pleasant surprise to see that their manufacturing efficiencies are producing results with the reduction in revenues but increased margins to >20%, as well as almost twice the FCF than Ford.
Did you catch the part where he expects Model Y to sell more than Models S,X, and 3 combined? Production target of 20M/year total (need more battery factories). Really want to see the truck and Roadster production though.
That was pretty cool too. I think the Pickup could outsell Model Y.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:43 PM
  #2527  
RonF's Avatar
RonF
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 457
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Feature complete.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_complete
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:48 PM
  #2528  
whiz944's Avatar
whiz944
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 448
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf
Nah, it'll be "feature complete" by the end of the year.

You just need to keep changing the definition of "complete" and the list of "features".
"Feature complete" - maybe yes. "Bug-free"? Certainly not.

I'm still on the fence whether to upgrade my EAP to FSD - before the price goes up. The techie in me says "yes". At worst, I'll get the new neural net hardware (20x faster than what I have now). As the software starts taking advantage of it, even existing features should get better.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:48 PM
  #2529  
RonF's Avatar
RonF
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 457
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by whiz944
That was pretty cool too. I think the Pickup could outsell Model Y.
Still no idea what Elon has in mind for the pickup. If done right electric pickups could spell the end of Ford and GM. Although I kind of think he wants to create a new market instead of to replace traditional pickups. We'll find out soon.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:02 PM
  #2530  
acoste's Avatar
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 137
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by whiz944
Glad I’m long, not short, on TSLA today - after yesterday’s earnings call. Anyone still holding a short position must be about to jump out the window.

On the techie front, Model 3s are getting another 5% power increase via OTA update. Model S and X getting 3%. Also true one pedal driving. China plant ahead of schedule. Model Y ahead of schedule. May even see some production Semis next year.
I wonder what are long investors hoping for. If the product lacks quality control (car and solar) do you expect the leadership to be superb in long term? Their best case scenario is to become another GM unless there is some change in management.

Great at financial engineering (did you look at the underlyings?). Horrible at mechanical engineering. Good luck you all.

First day with the car! First day with a loaner.

Tesla Model 3: Comprehensive Buyer's Guide To Known Issues, Problems

Walmart Sues Tesla Over Solar Cells That Allegedly Sparked Fires
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:06 PM
  #2531  
Whoopsy's Avatar
Whoopsy
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 1,516
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by RonF
So? You don't even know how the market works and the reason why those "analysts" could at best earn a salary instead of be a profitable investors themselves from those "technical" garbages? At this very moment half of all investors on the planet have reasons to believe the stock is worth $300 or more and the other half believe it should worth $300 or less. You can have all your reasons to believe whatever you want to believe but the market has its own magic way to determine value of a company.

Why going all defensive? You are like defending Tesla at all cost.

I don't have a position on TSLA one way or another. Stop trading it since the stock price went psycho a long time ago. (BTW, stock market is how I made my money in order to afford all the toys I have )

Actually can I ask you do YOU know how stock market works? If you do, then you will realized WHY the shorts are circling TSLA and not someone else.

BTW, 'analysts' are easily bought, wine and dine them and they will say whatever you want them to say. Ask me how I know

Literally all of Tesla's debt are tied to it's stock price, so are Elon's personal loans to the bank, and his pay package. He needs to maintained a elevated stock price just to stay afloat. Why do you think every now and then he would come out and say something taboos stock price? The shorts reads reports and do their own investigations and came to the conclusion that there is no way TSLA can be at whatever elevated price, hence the short position cause the fundamentals doesn't support the price. But like I said, TSLA is a emotional stock, there is no technical 'trend' to base it off with.

Shorts perhaps are bad for a company, but they are also there to keep a company honest. I don't see Tesla going away, it is here to stay, but some shorts are there to stay till TSLA hit $0, they have their reasons and convictions. So be it.

Shorts are like sharks in the water, they smell blood and gathered. The easiest way to get rid of shorts is to get rid of the blood. The sharks will leave and find another pool of blood to feed on. Let the stock price come back down to earth, to a reasonable level based on reasonable expectations. No more meat for shorts to feast on. It will be a bit painful, but worth it just to get rid of the distractions. From that point forward, Tesla can execute their plans according to their schedule, and not react to shorts' positions.

But right now Elon is stuck between a rock and a hard place simply because he locked in some un-reasonable stock price for their debts, personal and corporate. Letting the stock price come back isn't an option anymore. The only way left is to ramp up the fundamentals quickly to catch up and at least maintain a reasonable gap that's not very profitable for shorts. Would have been easier to do when they had the monopoly, but they don't anymore.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:17 PM
  #2532  
acoste's Avatar
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 137
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Faster supercharging
They are stretching over their limits. The Model 3 battery gets heated up to 50 deg C to be able to accept the charge at 200kW. The higher the temperature the faster the battery degrades.

The 800V system can easily provide the speed which Tesla is sweating with. Additionally few other cars fill up faster despite having lower max charge power since they don't fade as quickly over SoC.


Originally Posted by Dyefrog
FSD feature complete by end of year
This is the funniest. Is smart summon feature complete? Nope, they just needed the revenue so they released it before the quarter end. Same will apply to 'FSD'.

Also Elon thinks FSD means traffic lights and stop signs. Where are the pedestrians???? Shall I remind you about the AAA video?


Originally Posted by Dyefrog
OTA update mentioned above will also increase range
So far they had 2 range increases with unchanged hardware. Both of them were fake, no change in real range but only in displayed range.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:22 PM
  #2533  
acoste's Avatar
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 137
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Did you catch the part where he expects Model Y to sell more than Models S,X, and 3 combined?
I expect the same, Model S and X sales keep dropping. People don't buy sedans any more so once the Y is out, 3 sales will fade.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:24 PM
  #2534  
acoste's Avatar
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 813
Likes: 137
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by whiz944
The storage business has MASSIVE upside.
Only if they build up their own cell manufacturing. Otherwise they are manufacturing constrained.

Additionally there will be a big fight for raw materials in 3-5 years. I don't expect that there will be much battery capacity left for the storage when cars can use batteries with higher profit.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 03:26 PM
  #2535  
Needsdecaf's Avatar
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 9,362
Likes: 2,894
From: The Woodlands, TX.
Default

Originally Posted by RonF
I'm aware of what it means.

Originally Posted by whiz944
"Feature complete" - maybe yes. "Bug-free"? Certainly not.

I'm still on the fence whether to upgrade my EAP to FSD - before the price goes up. The techie in me says "yes". At worst, I'll get the new neural net hardware (20x faster than what I have now). As the software starts taking advantage of it, even existing features should get better.
F*CK no should you spend your $$ on FSD.

Look, I really like a lot about Tesla, and there are some things I don't like. This foray down the rabbit hole of "Full Self Driving" is a total crock, IMO. I own a Model 3, have put 23k miles on it in 10 months. I know what it can and cannot do in almost every circumstance using EAP's features. (I know you do too, I'm saying this for others to clarify my viewpoint). To me Full Self Driving means just that. Full. Self. Driving. As in L4/L5 all the time, anywhere. None of this Level 3 BS or Level 4 on the highway, L3/L2 on surface streets. Full Self Driving means the car should be able to drive anywhere, at any time, with no need for driver intervention. Anything less than that to me is not "feature complete". And there's no way that's going to be in place at the end of the year.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:18 AM.