Rotor vibration
#151
15 years of racing. No mechanical issues other than brake line explosion no at- fault car accidents . however, ive been touched by a few who have lost control of their vehicles though.
Never had the car even pointed backward.
That's near 240 race days! plus the 5 years of DEing.
Ironically, lost my first tire in 15 years at the runnoffs on the outlap.. and it was a 1 year old hoosier too... never found the cause.
Never had the car even pointed backward.
That's near 240 race days! plus the 5 years of DEing.
Ironically, lost my first tire in 15 years at the runnoffs on the outlap.. and it was a 1 year old hoosier too... never found the cause.
#152
#153
I also don't believe if one is being reasonable, that the extra torque after the click amounts to anything significant.
-Mike
#154
15 years of racing. No mechanical issues other than brake line explosion no at- fault car accidents . however, ive been touched by a few who have lost control of their vehicles though.
Never had the car even pointed backward.
That's near 240 race days! plus the 5 years of DEing.
Never had the car even pointed backward.
That's near 240 race days! plus the 5 years of DEing.
Your check bounced.
-Mike
#155
My Z51 has a very specific track torque spec. I follow it.
#156
If you understand how these torque values come about, you understand where the min values come from.
generally, these specs incorporate all than be a factor in the losening of the bolt or nut.
1. heat
2. side load
3. heat cycling
4. material wear
5. time duration between lug tightening /wheel removal
6. tool calibration errors
7. water
8. water freezing and thawing around contact points
9. rust formulation
10. number of tightening cycles/ nut or bolt deformation
all the above + 10% safety margin
if you were an engineer and the lab question was to come up with a torque value. .. sure, it would be a range. they would narrow it down with the factors above and put in a safety margin for the guy that has a tool that is defective or is set at the wrong setting.
i would say, for 20-30mins on the track, i would feel safe driving lugs that were with in 25% of the spec, or about 75ft-lbs. I would never tighten the nuts to that level, but i would have no problem short term with that value.
#158
I hope you get over yourself sometime soon and go back and get your Associates Degree and take a physics class while you are at it!
your ambivalence to shuffle steering, not being able to downshift properly before turns and how to handle a brake failure are 3 of the glaring areas where you provide mis-information. im SURE im just scratching the surface.
#159
I'm at the top 1%... so just leave it at that!
#160
A spec may say 45-55 ft-lbs. This means any torque between 45 and 55 is within spec. 45 is just as okay as 55. Generally, if the fastener is clean, I would torque to 50 as that gives the best chance of actually being between 45 and 55. In this case, 5 below would be 40 ft-lbs, and out of spec.
The studs I use from Bimmerworld say use 75 ft-lbs with no range, so I use 75.
Of course, there is no point in arguing any of this because Speed Racer doesn't use a torque wrench.
-Mike
#161
#162
i think your knowledge of the car, forces and performance are so inadequate for a paid trainer that you are a danger to all around you.. ... worse, in that your dangerous mis-information is propagated to others.... that concerns me in a sport where knowledge is life!
#163
so, even if you could find someone with a "cleaner" record, it cant be any cleaner than perfect..... so, check cashed and spent on my hot wife!
Let me be more clear... No touching other cars by me in 20 years!
#164
OK. Horse flogged to death. If anyone here is foolish enough to follow his advice, on ANYTHING, please make sure I am on the other side of the continent.
#165
\
1. heat
2. side load
3. heat cycling
4. material wear
5. time duration between lug tightening /wheel removal
6. tool calibration errors
7. water
8. water freezing and thawing around contact points
9. rust formulation
10. number of tightening cycles/ nut or bolt deformation
all the above + 10% safety margin
if you were an engineer and the lab question was to come up with a torque value. .. sure, it would be a range. they would narrow it down with the factors above and put in a safety margin for the guy that has a tool that is defective or is set at the wrong setting.
i would say, for 20-30mins on the track, i would feel safe driving lugs that were with in 25% of the spec, or about 75ft-lbs. I would never tighten the nuts to that level, but i would have no problem short term with that value.
1. heat
2. side load
3. heat cycling
4. material wear
5. time duration between lug tightening /wheel removal
6. tool calibration errors
7. water
8. water freezing and thawing around contact points
9. rust formulation
10. number of tightening cycles/ nut or bolt deformation
all the above + 10% safety margin
if you were an engineer and the lab question was to come up with a torque value. .. sure, it would be a range. they would narrow it down with the factors above and put in a safety margin for the guy that has a tool that is defective or is set at the wrong setting.
i would say, for 20-30mins on the track, i would feel safe driving lugs that were with in 25% of the spec, or about 75ft-lbs. I would never tighten the nuts to that level, but i would have no problem short term with that value.
-Mike