Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ramblings from Clash at the Glen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2009, 10:53 AM
  #106  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

See, now you absolutely did the right thing there. You had no clue which way he was going to spin, and if you had kept your foot in it, he probably would have hit you as he came back onto the track. You're pretty much screwed because the drivers behind you had more time to assess the situation. That's racing.

As far as what happened at the Glen, personally I probably would have gently backed out of the throttle and made sure at the same time that I was positioned on the track where I could not be passed. But I am obviously making that call after seeing your video. That's why they call it 20/20 hindsight.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 06-02-2009, 11:41 AM
  #107  
gums
Rennlist Member
 
gums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

This is all well and good, but I will always say that the problem here is that we're all trying to figure out how to work around the stupidity of the antiquated Watkins Glen armco, which transforms a most fantastic road course into a street circuit. That 944 should have had a harmless spin into the grass, but because it's the Glen; instead it's a wreck. Same for all these guys's cars, seen here in the boneyard.

Old 06-02-2009, 12:30 PM
  #108  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,118
Received 261 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Blame Jackie Stewart for the armco. I'd love to see most of it gone but I doubt that will happen since it affords safety for the fans in many of the spectator areas where it makes no sense otherwise.
Old 06-02-2009, 12:38 PM
  #109  
gums
Rennlist Member
 
gums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Jackie Stewart? Like I said; antiquated.
Old 06-02-2009, 12:53 PM
  #110  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,118
Received 261 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gums
Jackie Stewart? Like I said; antiquated.
Yes, when he was the head of the Grand Prix Drivers Association (GPDA). Armco was high on his list of safety improvements that were implemented in the early 70s. While it eats cars, it probably has saved lives.
Old 06-02-2009, 01:11 PM
  #111  
forklift
Rennlist Member
 
forklift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 2,182
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Only been to the Glen once, but walked around specifically to see why the Armco was so close….and for some of the corners there really isn’t any choice due to the ground falling away from the track at a steep angle unless LOTS of dirt was brought in. However, there were quite a few….especially the last set of turns (8-11) where there is plenty of room for them to move back the walls/Armco.

I just don’t understand why they wouldn’t move back the tire walls…….esp on turns 9 & 11...there is plenty of room and the armco is RIGHT there.
Old 06-02-2009, 01:11 PM
  #112  
gums
Rennlist Member
 
gums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

It's also CAUSED a few fatalities: Cervert & Koinigg come to mind.
Old 06-02-2009, 04:37 PM
  #113  
NJcroc
Racer
 
NJcroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

While we can argue both sides of the armco forever( I ate some2 weeks ago) It does add quite a bit to driving there. If they moved back the armco then turn 10 would not be scary full bore. How damm fast would some guys try turn 11 with no penelty?

that said i was really sad when i got a bill for 2 pieces of armco in my email
Old 06-02-2009, 04:42 PM
  #114  
Brian P
Rennlist Member
 
Brian P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJcroc
that said i was really sad when i got a bill for 2 pieces of armco in my email
We were wondering about this. How much damage do you need to do to get a bill for the armco? If you run against it and mainly scrape the paint off the armco, does that result in a bill? Or, do you have to do enough damage where they actually need replace the armco?
Old 06-02-2009, 04:56 PM
  #115  
analogmike
Rennlist Member
 
analogmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Danbury, CT, USA
Posts: 3,916
Received 103 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forklift
I just don’t understand why they wouldn’t move back the tire walls…….esp on turns 9 & 11...there is plenty of room and the armco is RIGHT there.
NASCAR owns it, right? Makes good TV?
Old 06-02-2009, 05:00 PM
  #116  
gums
Rennlist Member
 
gums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

With all due respect, croc, I don't need any armco anywhere for the purpose of making it scary. Did you guys see the video of the Spec Miata wreck at 11 last season? How about when the whole BMW team was destroyed in one shot? NASCAR had a big mess there too last year.
Completely frivolous, unneccessary and someone is going go get it bad there.
Old 06-02-2009, 05:25 PM
  #117  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the outside of the laces, outside of the toe, track out of T9 should be easy to move and re-grade. The outside of T11 is tough because it would require a new bridge while I think the outside of the outer loop is a significant drop off/ravine.
Old 06-02-2009, 05:35 PM
  #118  
NJcroc
Racer
 
NJcroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am not saying we need the armco. I am just saying it is one of the things that make the track what it is. A little bit of pucker factor is somethig that makes people drive from across the country to get to it. If i wasnt nervous sometimes I would save 3 seconds a lap
Old 06-02-2009, 05:39 PM
  #119  
JClark
Instructor
 
JClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd rather hit a guardrail then roll 30 feet down the embankment on the side of T5. If the track was in a field, you'd have runoff and it'd be flat and boring like many other tracks. Instead its on a hill, and it rocks, and you pay for its awesomeness in bumpers and fenders.
Old 06-02-2009, 08:45 PM
  #120  
DrJupeman
Rennlist Member
 
DrJupeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 9,170
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chas911
Charlie, did I hurt your chances for a win.

Sorry, I spun on exit of turn 8 trying to hold off an H and J car.

Charlie
You didn't just hurt my chances, you were the reason for the loss. How's that?

Seriously, I'm glad you didn't hurt your car in the off-track spin. I did appreciate the courtesy you showed me when you were back underway. Receiving a few point bys helped me close the gap on Andy after he grabbed the timely pit. I needed a 2 hour enduro, though, to make up the lost time.


Quick Reply: Ramblings from Clash at the Glen



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:17 AM.