Acceptable brake pad thickness for track?
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas/FortWorth Texas
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Acceptable brake pad thickness for track?
I have a couple of DE's coming up and just pulled my brake pads to check the thickness. I'd like to get some input on this. I am running PFC97 pads both front and rear on a 964 C2 (RSA). On the late 964's like mine, the brakes are identical front and rear. New pad thickness is about 11.25mm. My rears are between 3.5mm to 5mm (it varies between the pads). By my calculations, my rear pads are about 1/3 of original thickness. Are these too thin to run on the rear for track days? I run in the intermediate run group (yellow). My front pads are 7.3mm (65% of original thickness), so no issues there. I have a new set of pads in the box as back ups, but don't want to throw out the rears if they still have a couple of track days left in them. No sense wasting money if I don't have to. When I do replace the rears, I'll rotate the used fronts to the rear and put the brand new pads in the front.
#2
Rennlist Member
The good thing about PFC race pads like the 97's and 01's is that they are unique: you can run them down to the backing plate, especially in cooler weather. The bad news with 67% wear in the rear of a 911 (which will consume rear pads generally faster than fronts, IIRC), when contemplating a braking track like MSR with any pad, is that you may find yourself down to said backing plate before the weekend is over. So IMO run then Saturday, then check to see if you need ot replace them before Sunday.
Also, since the rears wear faster, why not leave the fronts alone when you do replace the rears? they may wear out at the same rate.
Also, since the rears wear faster, why not leave the fronts alone when you do replace the rears? they may wear out at the same rate.
#3
Rennlist Member
I dont like to run them all the way down even if they can still brake because of the fact that the thinner pad transmits heat more readily. I never go to the track for a weekend starting out at less than 50% without plans to do one pad change.
I use pagid yellows R29 front, black rear.
I use pagid yellows R29 front, black rear.
#5
My experience with 964 brakes on an early 911 was that the fronts wear about 2X as fast as the rear. (While the pad size is the same F+R the front pistons are much larger.)
Were these pads all new when replaced? So you are wearing the rear much faster? Or have the fronts been replaced at some point?
Were these pads all new when replaced? So you are wearing the rear much faster? Or have the fronts been replaced at some point?
#7
Rennlist Member
Check your tech inspection form as some regions I've run with require at least 50% pad life remaining.
I run the 97s too and after 7 events I'm still above 50% so I would feel comfortable running them with 1/3 thickness.
I run the 97s too and after 7 events I'm still above 50% so I would feel comfortable running them with 1/3 thickness.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Old People
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Rear TIRES wear faster in a 911 but the front brake pads (in a stock setup...no adjustable bias control) will wear about twice as fast.
I change my pads when the pad thickness is even or less than the backing plate.
#9
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas/FortWorth Texas
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My experience with 964 brakes on an early 911 was that the fronts wear about 2X as fast as the rear. (While the pad size is the same F+R the front pistons are much larger.)
Were these pads all new when replaced? So you are wearing the rear much faster? Or have the fronts been replaced at some point?
Were these pads all new when replaced? So you are wearing the rear much faster? Or have the fronts been replaced at some point?
The decision I have is whether to go ahead and make that swap now and put new pads in and toss the rear pads that have 1/3 remaining, or run it at least on Day One the way it is and then check them. Again, I have a new set of pads with me so I can easily swap them out at the track if needed (easily being a relative term). Based on everyone's input, I think I'll go ahead and run them they way they are and check them at end of day one. This is for MSR Cresson next weekend. I'll definitely have new pads swapped in for Eagles Canyon. That track is much harder on brakes!
I appreciate the feedback everyone!
#11
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I have lost track of how many 911s I have tracked in the past 35+ years, both racing and DE, and I have never had a 911 wear the rear pads more quickly than the fronts...or even as quickly as the fronts. In some 911s, I have had the rears wear only slightly less than the fronts, but those were rare. My current RSA, with stock brakes (same pads front and rear, different pistons) wears the front much more quickly than the rears.
Anyway, if my pads are more than 50% worn prior to an event, I usually replace them before the event (exception might be a 2 day event at a track that is relatively easy on my brakes). While I always have back-ups, I'm am VERY lazy and would rather be enjoying a cold one or three after a track day than changing brake pads.
Anyway, if my pads are more than 50% worn prior to an event, I usually replace them before the event (exception might be a 2 day event at a track that is relatively easy on my brakes). While I always have back-ups, I'm am VERY lazy and would rather be enjoying a cold one or three after a track day than changing brake pads.
#12
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
IIRC, there is a company that manufactures titanium based 'shims' that mount betwee the brake pad backing and the piston, designed to minimize heat trasfer to the fluid.
I have not tried nor bought them, nor tried to work out the math/thermodyanics to see if their claim is reasonable.
I have not tried nor bought them, nor tried to work out the math/thermodyanics to see if their claim is reasonable.
#15
I have lost track of how many 911s I have tracked in the past 35+ years, both racing and DE, and I have never had a 911 wear the rear pads more quickly than the fronts...or even as quickly as the fronts. In some 911s, I have had the rears wear only slightly less than the fronts, but those were rare. My current RSA, with stock brakes (same pads front and rear, different pistons) wears the front much more quickly than the rears.
Anyway, if my pads are more than 50% worn prior to an event, I usually replace them before the event (exception might be a 2 day event at a track that is relatively easy on my brakes). While I always have back-ups, I'm am VERY lazy and would rather be enjoying a cold one or three after a track day than changing brake pads.
Anyway, if my pads are more than 50% worn prior to an event, I usually replace them before the event (exception might be a 2 day event at a track that is relatively easy on my brakes). While I always have back-ups, I'm am VERY lazy and would rather be enjoying a cold one or three after a track day than changing brake pads.
My experience and laziness as well . And as you point out, I should've said same pads, not calipers. There's a bias valve involved in this discussion as well.