LRP April 24, 25, 26........
#166
when were you guys weighing in? I don't even know where the scales are at LRP. Maybe the crew did it at tech for me, I wasn't there. I got busted for noise later in the day. I hear 20 of us were meatballed.
#167
they weighed all of "D" class after qualifying. I think it was because Bill R busted out a 1:01.1 in the enduro (new track record). But, Bill was already out with a mechanical.
I got busted for noise in qual...Gary got it as well
I got busted for noise in qual...Gary got it as well
#169
Colin - I had just weighed the car at Dan's and it was 2750 with no cool-suit cooler and under 1/2 tank of gas. Bela was standing right there and the guy just said "hey, scales differ, move". I just didn't know to argue the point and wanted to be non-aggresive to the poor volunteer. When I came back (after adding 75LB) and he told me I was 20 LB heavier I took a different stance. moving 2 inches took me from 2685 to 2800. I politely asked about the DQ and he said they have no way of knowing what I added, so I accepted it and had a blast passing a LOT of cars. I chock it up to a learning experience, and my racecraft lessons moving through the pack will be of great benefit in upcoming events. I have no regrets, life goes on!
I did find out why my car was diving under hard braking and acting a little squirrelly. When I put it ion the lift at my house the left ball joint and A-Arm were covered in oil/dirt, all coming from the drift pin holding the left front shock in the strut. Apparently all the oil that used to be in the shock is on the ground somewhere!
#170
Colin - I had just weighed the car at Dan's and it was 2750 with no cool-suit cooler and under 1/2 tank of gas. Bela was standing right there and the guy just said "hey, scales differ, move". I just didn't know to argue the point and wanted to be non-aggresive to the poor volunteer. When I came back (after adding 75LB) and he told me I was 20 LB heavier I took a different stance. moving 2 inches took me from 2685 to 2800. I politely asked about the DQ and he said they have no way of knowing what I added, so I accepted it and had a blast passing a LOT of cars. I chock it up to a learning experience, and my racecraft lessons moving through the pack will be of great benefit in upcoming events. I have no regrets, life goes on!
#171
We got "Scale flagged" after qualifying.. Last year the scales were at the fuel pumps, this year they were in Paddock A just south of the dividing road next to Automobile Associates trailer. I got popped with a meatball in the 2nd Sprint practice, 94db. I've been running the same engine/exhaust there for 3 years now, never a problem before. Dan J. shoved a baffle in, all was well after that.
#172
We got "Scale flagged" after qualifying.. Last year the scales were at the fuel pumps, this year they were in Paddock A just south of the dividing road next to Automobile Associates trailer. I got popped with a meatball in the 2nd Sprint practice, 94db. I've been running the same engine/exhaust there for 3 years now, never a problem before. Dan J. shoved a baffle in, all was well after that.
just curious.
#173
#174
My fix was to drive again in the next session and lift when I saw the guy pointing the sound meter at me. My understanding is that if you get black flagged a second time, you are no longer allowed to drive for the rest of the day (or possibly the event)
Given that I had been at the same track for 6 days over the past two weeks with no problems whatsoever, my belief is that the person in charge of measuring the sound was a bit mistaken in his readings.
#176
#178
#179
I'm surprised it's taking AMB this long. It seems strange that they have a method for real-time updates, but they can't seem to handle something that isn't real time.
#180
This may have been the first event of the year that they measured sound, or at least the first where they were very stringent...that's what I heard from some of the folks in the know.
Also, sound testing is a pretty scientific thing and when you do it you are supposed to follow certain guidelines. Holding up a hand held unit in an arbitrary location is not the right way to do it. The angle of the meter, distance to reflective objects, distance to the source, secondary noise generating objects, wind patterns, temp/humidity, terrain all effect the reading. There's no way they are getting an absolute reading and using their inaccurate reading is just wasting everyone's time and money.
Also, sound testing is a pretty scientific thing and when you do it you are supposed to follow certain guidelines. Holding up a hand held unit in an arbitrary location is not the right way to do it. The angle of the meter, distance to reflective objects, distance to the source, secondary noise generating objects, wind patterns, temp/humidity, terrain all effect the reading. There's no way they are getting an absolute reading and using their inaccurate reading is just wasting everyone's time and money.