Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 Club Racer Build...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:23 PM
  #16  
Juan Lopez's Avatar
Juan Lopez
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 59
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

Skip, you got a pm
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
I really thought that BS rule would be dumped this year..
I guess no one brought it up, Gary. There's always this fall . . .
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:32 PM
  #18  
swftiii's Avatar
swftiii
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 17
From: Parkland, FL
Default

Mark,

I'll be on your soap box next year...

-Skip
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:33 PM
  #19  
Gary R.'s Avatar
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 292
From: Valencia, Spain
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
I guess no one brought it up, Gary. There's always next fall . . .
I *think* Colin did, not 100% sure. We should get a consortium together and be sure it gets done next year. All it does now is cost us all money in prematurely trashed tires. I flip mine on the rims but that isn't free either...
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:39 PM
  #20  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
I *think* Colin did, not 100% sure. We should get a consortium together and be sure it gets done next year. All it does now is cost us all money in prematurely trashed tires. I flip mine on the rims but that isn't free either...
I agree 1000%. It's silly how much quicker tires wear at a stock setting. As risk-averse as PCA is, I'm surprised that the safety issues of poorly wearing tires is not of concern. I wonder why it didn't make it as a proposed change? This seems like a no-brainer to me.
Old 02-05-2008 | 12:59 PM
  #21  
Geoffrey's Avatar
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 12
From: Kingston, NY
Default

Hey Gary, that is one cool looking car in your avitar.
Old 02-05-2008 | 01:16 PM
  #22  
joey bagadonuts's Avatar
joey bagadonuts
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 1
From: Highland Park, IL
Default

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Slow down! Why don't we just allow big brakes, chips and 8:32 r&p's in stock class, too?! They've already caved on non-Factory LSD's and LWF's ... soon there won't be a difference between Stock and Prepared cars!


I think the rules committee actually reviewed this issue and revised Prepared Rule 2 to specificy that (non-pinned) camber plates were, in fact, a Prepared mod:
"Slotting or camber plates used to achieve suspension settings is allowed."
Old 02-05-2008 | 02:09 PM
  #23  
Manny Alban's Avatar
Manny Alban
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 55
From: Maryland
Default

My camber plates are still 'centered' and pinned from when I ran in stock class. I don't have any problem getting 3 degrees of negative camber. Don't know if this is typical for 964's.
Old 02-05-2008 | 02:29 PM
  #24  
Gary R.'s Avatar
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 292
From: Valencia, Spain
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
Hey Gary, that is one cool looking car in your avitar.

Thought you would like that...
Old 02-05-2008 | 02:50 PM
  #25  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by joey bagadonuts
Whoa, whoa, whoa! Slow down! Why don't we just allow big brakes, chips and 8:32 r&p's in stock class, too?! They've already caved on non-Factory LSD's and LWF's ... soon there won't be a difference between Stock and Prepared cars!


I think the rules committee actually reviewed this issue and revised Prepared Rule 2 to specificy that (non-pinned) camber plates were, in fact, a Prepared mod:

Joe,

Remember, the LWF is allowed for your car, too. This is a good thing.

I think PCA allowed the LWF because the stock DMF was prone to problems. The LSD may have been due to not being able to tell if someone was running a Guards or not.

Most DE people who are beyond the blue group are already running camber plates anyway, so when they make the jump to club racing, they're going backwards. The chip and R&P mods you mention have nothing to do with safety and long-term economic costs (i.e. getting the most track time out of your tires is a great benefit versus the very small cost of having to put in camber plates).


Originally Posted by Manny Alban
My camber plates are still 'centered' and pinned from when I ran in stock class. I don't have any problem getting 3 degrees of negative camber. Don't know if this is typical for 964's.
Old 02-05-2008 | 03:25 PM
  #26  
joey bagadonuts's Avatar
joey bagadonuts
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 1
From: Highland Park, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
Remember, the LWF is allowed for your car, too. This is a good thing.
It's all relative, of course. If I was running a stock F car, I would totally see the wisdom behind such a ruling--kudos PCA! Of course, since I'm running a Prepared car, I'm completely convinced that this kind of thinking runs counter to the very spirit and guiding principles behind PCA Club Racing.
Old 02-05-2008 | 03:43 PM
  #27  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by joey bagadonuts
I'm completely convinced that this kind of thinking runs counter to the very spirit and guiding principles behind PCA Club Racing.
Just like requiring all club race cars, including the drive-to-the-track cars, to have a full cage. In the end, I suppose it's what the majority of racers want since it is a club, our club.



Quick Reply: 964 Club Racer Build...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:11 PM.