Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New GT Rules in PCA - Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2008, 06:26 PM
  #1  
BluemaxxRacing
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BluemaxxRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tequesta, FL & Park City, UT
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New GT Rules in PCA - Question

Ok guys, so I need some of your help getting these new PCA rules understood and where I can put my car. As many of you know, I have a '99 996 that I have been running in C-stock for the last 2 years. Now, I can't keep it in stock because it is completely stripped out and I want to keep it that way, which means that I can put it in the new GTB class or I can go into one of the higher GT classes, right?

Here is what is confusing to me. I don't really get the whole chart for the 14 different engine types, especially since my 3.4 liter water cooled engine is not listed there. I understand the new Performance index and I think it looks super interesting. But how does the 14 different engine types figure into the Performance Index? Assuming I completely forget the different engine types, here is what I have come up with.

Right now, my car is weighing in at around 2700 lbs without me in it. With me and my gear lets say it will be back up to around 2900 lbs. When computing my numbers into the Performance Index = (Weight/[Displacement x Horsepower/Liter for engine type]) x 100 this is what I get;

2900 / 300 x 100 = 966.66

This puts me in GT6. Is this right??
Old 01-03-2008, 06:39 PM
  #2  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I think it should be 2900 lbs/(3.4 L X 100) = 8.53
Old 01-03-2008, 06:41 PM
  #3  
Gasser
Burning Brakes
 
Gasser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure if the engine 986 is a typo but I think your conversion factor will be around 135/L So

135*3.4=459

So your final number would be 632 and would put you in GT3. You could add weight and then run in GT4.

Good luck...

I will say on EDIT, I could not find your engine type and hp figure but my 6cl air cooled is 110 and I can't imagine a water cooled would be less per liter than an air cooled. I think the 135hp/L will be right but will wait for clarificaton.
Old 01-03-2008, 06:48 PM
  #4  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Your car has a 986 type engine which has a performance factor of 135. You need to use the cc of the engine represented in liter (I'm not sure off hand what the bore and stroke of that engine is) so if you have a 3400cc engine it is represented by 3.400l. If you have a 3745cc engine it would be 3.745l. Using your weight of 2900lbs, the factor would be

2900 / (3.400 x 135) x 100 = 632 which fall into GT3. Your car would compete aginst a 993RSR with 400hp, a 2.5l 944 Turbo, lightweight 3.4l early cars. I think you would have difficutly being competitive in that car at that weight. If you could lower the weight to 2700lbs with driver I think you'd be far more competitive. I would consider looking into the GTB class for your car.
Old 01-03-2008, 06:54 PM
  #5  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gasser
Not sure if the engine 986 is a typo but I think your conversion factor will be around 135/L So

135*3.4=459

So your final number would be 632 and would put you in GT3. You could add weight and then run in GT4.

Good luck...

I will say on EDIT, I could not find your engine type and hp figure but my 6cl air cooled is 110 and I can't imagine a water cooled would be less per liter than an air cooled. I think the 135hp/L will be right but will wait for clarificaton.
the 986 and 996 share the same type of technology, blocks and 4 valve water cooled heads so using the same 135hp/L is not a stretch.
Old 01-03-2008, 07:10 PM
  #6  
BluemaxxRacing
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BluemaxxRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tequesta, FL & Park City, UT
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van
I think it should be 2900 lbs/(3.4 L X 100) = 8.53
Thanks Van but based on the Index, my full equation would be as follows;

2900/[ 3.4 ltr displacement X 87.06 Horsepower/Liter for engine type]) x 100

I get 87.06 for my hp/ltr by dividing 296 by 3.4 = 87.06

I now wondering if I should be plugging in the 6 cyl 986-based number of 135 instead of my 87.06 like Glasser did??
Old 01-03-2008, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I get 87.06 for my hp/ltr by dividing 296 by 3.4 = 87.06
No, the performance index for an engine type is the theoretical maximum HP/L that engine type can possibly make. In the case of your 986 type engine the performance index is 135hp/l. Your value of 87.06 has no bearing on the calculation.
Old 01-03-2008, 08:14 PM
  #8  
BluemaxxRacing
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BluemaxxRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tequesta, FL & Park City, UT
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Glasser, Karlooz and Geoffrey - thanks so much for the help! Really clears things up for me. Looks like GT3 is the class for my car for all weights between 2700 and 3100 lbs.

No thanks!!
Old 01-04-2008, 12:02 AM
  #9  
PedroNole
Rennlist Member
 
PedroNole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Old People
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

At 3,105lbs you would be at the very top of GT4. That would be a whole lot better than being at the top of GT3 especially if you have a semi-stock motor. Your biggest downfall is the HP/L calculation (135) they assign to you for the water pumper. Even so, I would think you would be lot better off adding weight and running in GT4 than trying to lose weight for GT3. Maybe GTB is the way to go in the end although it doesn't look like they have much info on it yet from what I could see.

Jump into GT4, the water's warm
Old 01-04-2008, 10:39 PM
  #10  
Ed Newman
Three Wheelin'
 
Ed Newman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island , NY
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

water cooled 911's can only run in GTA and GTB. GTA is for factory based race cars and GTB is for street based race cars.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:54 PM
  #11  
38D
Nordschleife Master
 
38D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: About to pass you...
Posts: 6,640
Received 797 Likes on 404 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedroNole
At 3,105lbs you would be at the very top of GT4. That would be a whole lot better than being at the top of GT3 especially if you have a semi-stock motor. Your biggest downfall is the HP/L calculation (135) they assign to you for the water pumper. Even so, I would think you would be lot better off adding weight and running in GT4 than trying to lose weight for GT3. Maybe GTB is the way to go in the end although it doesn't look like they have much info on it yet from what I could see.

Jump into GT4, the water's warm
You can only add ballast to move up one class, not 2 or more.
Old 01-04-2008, 11:18 PM
  #12  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Newman
water cooled 911's can only run in GTA and GTB. GTA is for factory based race cars and GTB is for street based race cars.
really? that bites. so a boxster with a water cooled 3.4L can run in gt3 but a 996 3.4L can't. something wrong with this picture.
Old 01-05-2008, 12:04 AM
  #13  
PedroNole
Rennlist Member
 
PedroNole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Old People
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 38D
You can only add ballast to move up one class, not 2 or more.
He did the wrong math/calculation in his original post. He would really be running in GT3 so I suggested adding balast to go to GT4. Is that wrong?
Old 01-05-2008, 12:07 AM
  #14  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karlooz
really? that bites. so a boxster with a water cooled 3.4L can run in gt3 but a 996 3.4L can't. something wrong with this picture.
Where did you get this from? If they are he same weight, with the same water-cooled motor at 3.4L, then they will run in the same GT class.

I think that we need a primer on the new GT rules.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 01-05-2008, 12:20 AM
  #15  
BluemaxxRacing
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BluemaxxRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tequesta, FL & Park City, UT
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
Where did you get this from? If they are he same weight, with the same water-cooled motor at 3.4L, then they will run in the same GT class.

I think that we need a primer on the new GT rules.
I agree, Larry. This is why I was partially confused to start with.


Quick Reply: New GT Rules in PCA - Question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:40 PM.