8 pt hans harness
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
8 pt hans harness
**Disclaimer** I am asking these three questions to the owners and users of the HANS device, users of other H&N devices need not reply as there is no need to say that device 'a' is better than device 'b' here.
Has anyone ever used the Sparco 8pt Harness, Did you like it? Would you use this harness with your HANS device.
"The ideal solution for drivers who have difficulties becoming comfortable with their HANS® we’d like to introduce the newly designed “double belt” harness. The double belt has been tested and proven in F1, WRC and NASCAR.
HANS® specific 8-Point Double Shoulder Professional Restraint:
8 Point Restraint
Dual shoulder belt system for HANS® use
The 2” "HANS Belt" runs over the HANS® device, the 3” "Body Belt" runs under the HANS® device (see diagram to the right for details)
3” Lap belts
T-bar version
Aluminum aircraft quick release buckle fixed to the anti-sub strap
Pull Up
Snap In Harness
Approximately 2.60 kg (5.70 lbs)
SFI rated and FIA homologated
Rating valid generally for 5 years with most sanctioning race bodies"
Has anyone ever used the Sparco 8pt Harness, Did you like it? Would you use this harness with your HANS device.
"The ideal solution for drivers who have difficulties becoming comfortable with their HANS® we’d like to introduce the newly designed “double belt” harness. The double belt has been tested and proven in F1, WRC and NASCAR.
HANS® specific 8-Point Double Shoulder Professional Restraint:
8 Point Restraint
Dual shoulder belt system for HANS® use
The 2” "HANS Belt" runs over the HANS® device, the 3” "Body Belt" runs under the HANS® device (see diagram to the right for details)
3” Lap belts
T-bar version
Aluminum aircraft quick release buckle fixed to the anti-sub strap
Pull Up
Snap In Harness
Approximately 2.60 kg (5.70 lbs)
SFI rated and FIA homologated
Rating valid generally for 5 years with most sanctioning race bodies"
#2
Rennlist Member
I use the Schroth Hybrid II Hans-specific 6-point belt for the driver's side. They are comfortable and convenient. I think Schroth has a product similar to Sparco.
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Hey;
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the hardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the hardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
Last edited by RedlineMan; 07-07-2007 at 12:04 AM.
#4
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Disclaimer:
I own multiple H&N restraints (HANS, ISAAC, Leatt) and I have no interest in yet another H&N restraint jihad.
As John mentioned, this "dual shoulder" strap design has been discussed here in the past, under the Schroth name.
As John mentioned, it is a non compromise installation based harness; you need to be able to modify/move your horizontal bar(s) to suit your height, seat slots and harness terminations.
I own multiple H&N restraints (HANS, ISAAC, Leatt) and I have no interest in yet another H&N restraint jihad.
As John mentioned, this "dual shoulder" strap design has been discussed here in the past, under the Schroth name.
As John mentioned, it is a non compromise installation based harness; you need to be able to modify/move your horizontal bar(s) to suit your height, seat slots and harness terminations.
#5
Pocket Sand
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ask Rusty Shackleford.
Posts: 7,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Hey;
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the heardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the heardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
#6
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Hey;
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the hardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure. In any event, it is certainly patented technology, and the hardware and material certainly look like Schroth.
I would not want to discourage anyone from being as safe as could be, but I think this is a bit of overkill for most of us. I know they can be a bit tricky to setup properly as well.
Waiting for FatBillyBob to chime in, since he uses them.
I'm with Chris in feeling very secure with my Schroth Hybrid Hans 3/2 system.
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by fatbillybob
I am so small I offset the chest adjuster hardware just a bit so the belts can be put closer together. That extra 1/2" is important for me.
Trending Topics
#8
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by John H
Huh, I don't know why I pictured you as a toothless mullet wearing fat guy.
Thanks for the harness info!
#9
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by fatbillybob
.....They even got mad at me when I suggested the idea of crossing the shoulder belts in front which really held everything perfect but I guess there is not testing on that and I got basically chewed out for even thinking about it. I wish someone would tell me why that is bad...
Unlike the sternum strap (which is sewed into a 'fixed' (static) position relative to the harnesses and the driver, a 'crossed shoulder belt' configuration has no such fixed 'pivot point', at least relative to your neck/trachea.
#10
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by fatbillybob
I was at a seminar and Dr. Melvin from HANs said if he raced he would use the dual belt sytem. There is probaly more biodynamic reasons for his statment than I know about..
1. As a non captive H&N restraint, it is very difficult to keep the HANS under the shoulder harnesses. Hence the evolution over the years of 'wings', 'friction material', 'HANS specific 3"-2" shoulder belts', etc.
2. Due to #1 above, the use of the 'dual shoulder belt' harnesses "preferred" by Dr Melvin is simply the latest attempt to overcome this limitation in the design of the interface between the HANS and the driver/harness configuration.
Of course, the more you restrain the driver's motion (laterally, i.e. full containment seats/cockpits), the less likely this mode is to occur.
The main problem with the HANS is simple: how do you know you do not have a compromised (geometry) installation? Yes, you can wear it, yes, you can feel confident that many pro series require it, but those are under very different circumstances with repesct to a non compromised design, full containment seats/monocoques, etc. Unfortunately, without being able to (sled) test your installation geometries, combined with your cockpit containment, you really don't know.
Please, no intention of starting a flame war, please remember I own a HANS and a couple other H&N restraint devices. Just simply an engineering observation.
#11
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Hey;
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure.
The Sparco system is MADE by Schroth for Sparco, if I remember right. In fact I had heard that ALL the Sparco belts were re-branded Schroth items now. not sure.
Could be. I picked up a set of 6 point 3 inch harnesses from Sparco earlier this year, and the parts are branded sparco as well as Schroth. The manual actually has quiet a few Schroth logos. FIA certified, by the way.
-Garen (87 930 CS)
#12
Originally Posted by ltc
Perhaps due to the fact that a 'crossed shoulder belt' configuration would act like a high sternum strap and may be an issue to your neck/trachea in the event of an impact coupled with forward body motion?
Unlike the sternum strap (which is sewed into a 'fixed' (static) position relative to the harnesses and the driver, a 'crossed shoulder belt' configuration has no such fixed 'pivot point', at least relative to your neck/trachea.
Unlike the sternum strap (which is sewed into a 'fixed' (static) position relative to the harnesses and the driver, a 'crossed shoulder belt' configuration has no such fixed 'pivot point', at least relative to your neck/trachea.
#13
Originally Posted by ltc
Herein lies the fundamental issue (flaw) with the HANS device:
1. As a non captive H&N restraint, it is very difficult to keep the HANS under the shoulder harnesses. Hence the evolution over the years of 'wings', 'friction material', 'HANS specific 3"-2" shoulder belts', etc.
2. Due to #1 above, the use of the 'dual shoulder belt' harnesses "preferred" by Dr Melvin is simply the latest attempt to overcome this limitation in the design of the interface between the HANS and the driver/harness configuration.
Of course, the more you restrain the driver's motion (laterally, i.e. full containment seats/cockpits), the less likely this mode is to occur.
The main problem with the HANS is simple: how do you know you do not have a compromised (geometry) installation? Yes, you can wear it, yes, you can feel confident that many pro series require it, but those are under very different circumstances with repesct to a non compromised design, full containment seats/monocoques, etc. Unfortunately, without being able to (sled) test your installation geometries, combined with your cockpit containment, you really don't know.
Please, no intention of starting a flame war, please remember I own a HANS and a couple other H&N restraint devices. Just simply an engineering observation.
1. As a non captive H&N restraint, it is very difficult to keep the HANS under the shoulder harnesses. Hence the evolution over the years of 'wings', 'friction material', 'HANS specific 3"-2" shoulder belts', etc.
2. Due to #1 above, the use of the 'dual shoulder belt' harnesses "preferred" by Dr Melvin is simply the latest attempt to overcome this limitation in the design of the interface between the HANS and the driver/harness configuration.
Of course, the more you restrain the driver's motion (laterally, i.e. full containment seats/cockpits), the less likely this mode is to occur.
The main problem with the HANS is simple: how do you know you do not have a compromised (geometry) installation? Yes, you can wear it, yes, you can feel confident that many pro series require it, but those are under very different circumstances with repesct to a non compromised design, full containment seats/monocoques, etc. Unfortunately, without being able to (sled) test your installation geometries, combined with your cockpit containment, you really don't know.
Please, no intention of starting a flame war, please remember I own a HANS and a couple other H&N restraint devices. Just simply an engineering observation.
#14
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Garen
Could be. I picked up a set of 6 point 3 inch harnesses from Sparco earlier this year, and the parts are branded sparco as well as Schroth. The manual actually has quiet a few Schroth logos. FIA certified, by the way.
-Garen (87 930 CS)
-Garen (87 930 CS)
#15
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by fatbillybob
I hear you but perhaps the crossed straps allow movement so your neck is not in the same danger as with the fixed strap? I do not understand the biodynamics. Also look at Teamtech units like their jetpilot system. It uses a fixed strunum strap but get away with this because they say the velcro will break away before it chokes you. Well perhaps? If the Teamtech sturnum strap really works it would be the superior system because it can hold the shoulders to the hans collar and tails until impact so atleast you are in the proper position for the first hit. .
It did mention that the location of the strap would need to be below/at the bottom of the (chest) tails of the HANS.
There is no longer any mention of a sternum strap location/use, last time I checked.