Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

So who is at fault in this track accident?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2007, 09:59 PM
  #46  
Robert Henriksen
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Robert Henriksen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Highly likely.

More likely, however, was that he was droving the S2000.
No, no - he was droving the 911, and will now post about how he was totally under control the whole time, and that S2000 recklessly hit him!
Old 03-31-2007, 11:11 PM
  #47  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,787
Received 1,605 Likes on 834 Posts
Default

Hahahahaha!!
Old 04-01-2007, 08:13 PM
  #48  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I definitely blame the S2000 driver, who should have known better than to try passing an out-of-control car. Bone-headed move.

I always tell my students that offies most often occur just after passing, so give them room (if you were passed) or brake early and take the corner easy (if you are the passer). Spins like this will ALWAYS happen, and it's up to the guy following to avoid it, if at all possible.
Old 04-01-2007, 08:40 PM
  #49  
Astroman
Rennlist Member
 
Astroman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,997
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Maybe I need help with my math, but I count 4 "BONEHEADED" moves on the part of the 911, and only 1 for the S2000...

1) Stupid pass,
2) Ultra-early apex,
3) Refusing to put 2 feet in,
4) And last but certainly not least, pulling it hard back onto the track causing the contact.

So the S2000 gives him some space hoping the 911 will EVENTUALLY make a good decision... obviously the 911 never does... and because the S2000 doesn't completely lift, it's completely his fault???

I bet the 911 Bonehead was NOT blaming the S2000 in the paddock...
Old 04-01-2007, 08:55 PM
  #50  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Astroman
Maybe I need help with my math, but I count 4 "BONEHEADED" moves on the part of the 911, and only 1 for the S2000...

1) Stupid pass,
2) Ultra-early apex,
3) Refusing to put 2 feet in,
4) And last but certainly not least, pulling it hard back onto the track causing the contact.

So the S2000 gives him some space hoping the 911 will EVENTUALLY make a good decision... obviously the 911 never does... and because the S2000 doesn't completely lift, it's completely his fault???

I bet the 911 Bonehead was NOT blaming the S2000 in the paddock...
If that move happened in a club race and video was submitted, BOTH of Them would see a 13. STUPID BY BOTH DROVERS. IF the S2000 just looked ahead a used two more brain cells rather than his foot, then the 911 would have looped across or down the track. I have seen this both as a passenger and certainly behind the wheel with a front row seat for the spin/farming/accident.
Old 04-01-2007, 09:00 PM
  #51  
Sean F
NASA Racer
Rennlist Member
 
Sean F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 4,778
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

+1^^
Old 04-01-2007, 09:04 PM
  #52  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Astroman
Maybe I need help with my math, but I count 4 "BONEHEADED" moves on the part of the 911, and only 1 for the S2000...

1) Stupid pass,
2) Ultra-early apex,
3) Refusing to put 2 feet in,
4) And last but certainly not least, pulling it hard back onto the track causing the contact.

So the S2000 gives him some space hoping the 911 will EVENTUALLY make a good decision... obviously the 911 never does... and because the S2000 doesn't completely lift, it's completely his fault???

I bet the 911 Bonehead was NOT blaming the S2000 in the paddock...
Nope, the S2000 should have given him some space knowing that after 4 "BONEHEADED" moves (by your count) the 911 WOULD NOT likely "make a good decision"....in fact he was out of control at the turn-in point, and only compounded the fault after that...but the S2000 had a LOT of time to watch it unfold. The out of control 911 was, of course, the 911 driver's fault....the fact that there was an impact incident was the fault of the S2000 driver.
Old 04-01-2007, 09:05 PM
  #53  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,787
Received 1,605 Likes on 834 Posts
Default

I agree 100% with Bull.
Old 04-01-2007, 09:06 PM
  #54  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Astroman
... and because the S2000 doesn't completely lift, it's completely his fault???
Absolutely correct. A simple lift of the throttle to allow the BONEHEAD drover in the 911 complete his acrobatics will result in a S2K with no dents and a 911 with a bruised ego but the S2K (probably from a lack of total seat time) allowed this to be an "incident" rather than an off by the 911.

Last edited by LVDell; 04-01-2007 at 09:55 PM.
Old 04-01-2007, 09:20 PM
  #55  
ZAPmobile
Rennlist Member
 
ZAPmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hillsborough, North Carolina
Posts: 889
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I cannot fathom why anyone could possibly consider the 911 at fault. Let's all remember...again...that this is DE, even though it was a European DE and the passenger was a ride-along, not an instructor.

If the 911 had spun out, rolled over, hit the wall, etc., then the incident would have been totally the 911's fault. The minute the S2000 decided to accellerate at the apex and tried to get back around the 911, it became his total responsibility for what happened next.

The correct procedure would have been to show the international sign of the right fist up in the air (in the car) to indicate to any driver behind him that there was an incident or something happening on the track, and he needed to slow down and/or take evasive action.

This guy stupidly chose to accellerate, instead of waiting for the car to stop moving and driving around safely. Even if this were racing, the S2000 would still have been at fault, because anyone should know that in such circumstances, one aims for where the other car is rather than trying to dodge around it. The theory is that if you aim for where the other car is, it will no longer be there when you arrive at that point.

That aside, this is DE, and there was abosolutely no reason or excuse for there being any metal to metal in this situation.
Old 04-01-2007, 09:49 PM
  #56  
Astroman
Rennlist Member
 
Astroman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,997
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Even though I feel the 911 is more at fault, I'd agree with a 13 for both boneheads... In a hypothetical club race, is anyone suggesting a 13 ONLY for the S2000??
Old 04-01-2007, 10:27 PM
  #57  
ZAPmobile
Rennlist Member
 
ZAPmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hillsborough, North Carolina
Posts: 889
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

In Club Racing, the S2000 would get a 13 for avoidable contact; the 911 would not have received anything other than a busted car.
Old 04-01-2007, 10:29 PM
  #58  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Astroman, this is such a good video for students to see. I will forward it to our CI for classroom. Totally avoidable stupid stupid stupid stupid................ If I was shotgun, I would have hopped out before the apex. So obvious what was going to happen. Where the FFFFF did he think the 911 was going???? Pit IN??????
Old 04-01-2007, 10:42 PM
  #59  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,419
Received 611 Likes on 467 Posts
Default

You guys who blame the 911 sound like you've never spun a car on a race track or taken a corner too fast, etc. Does every one who spins in a DE get a 13/13 penalty? Honest question - I race with the POC so I don't know how PCA DE's work... Sliding cars, spinning cars, these things happen all the time but in this case it was so avoidable I am surprised anyone would blame the 911, ESPECIALLY in a DE environment when they're not even racing!
Old 04-01-2007, 10:48 PM
  #60  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Garret, no at a DE. Most clubs impose a 2 spin and your either done for the day or weekend at DE's. PCA club race a spin is not an incident. Contact with damage to your car or another car is a 13. If you are found completely free of fault ie, run into. You will not be on probation.


Quick Reply: So who is at fault in this track accident?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 PM.