Laguna Seca video with telemetry 1:39.8
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Laguna Seca video with telemetry 1:39.8
Track Porsche 993 driven by Kary Clements with a g2extreme logger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKXKzzoCEjw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKXKzzoCEjw
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
looked easy for him. nice time.
#6
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vacuuming Cal Speedway
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Wreck Me Otter
That looks like pre-repaving too....I bet he drops another 1.5 seconds now...
#7
Drifting
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Billy, thanks for posting that and putting it together with the trackvision software! Can you send his back to me as you formated it?
DJ, the sound issue was the fact that I converted it to another format for file size considerations and it lost it for some reason. I was using the PDR100 from ChaseCam. There were some sound issues anyway with this early version which will be fixed with the new model comming out next month. The gain cannot be set low enough for a loud engine and open windows (wind noise). Should be good with the next version.
The track was repaved and very nice. There was still another 2 seconds I think even with the mdeium compund Dunlops I was using. If I had had soft compound that would be another second to second and half for sure. That said if I had the will I think my car at 2850 LBS and stock motor would have been capable of at least a 1:37 with soft tires and more ***** on my part. Nonetheless I beat my best time there so I was happy
DJ, the sound issue was the fact that I converted it to another format for file size considerations and it lost it for some reason. I was using the PDR100 from ChaseCam. There were some sound issues anyway with this early version which will be fixed with the new model comming out next month. The gain cannot be set low enough for a loud engine and open windows (wind noise). Should be good with the next version.
The track was repaved and very nice. There was still another 2 seconds I think even with the mdeium compund Dunlops I was using. If I had had soft compound that would be another second to second and half for sure. That said if I had the will I think my car at 2850 LBS and stock motor would have been capable of at least a 1:37 with soft tires and more ***** on my part. Nonetheless I beat my best time there so I was happy
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
i just had a race there last weekend. The track is definitely a second or two faster depending on if you are on slicks or DOTs, or have a lot of HP. it seemed the big hp cars on slicks picked up more, while the lower hp cars picked up about a second on DOTs. personally, I ran a 1:39.1 vs my usual time of mid 1:40s.
I bet Supercup runs 1:30s while speed GT qualifies at 1:29 and races at 1:32s for the top 5 cars.
mk
I bet Supercup runs 1:30s while speed GT qualifies at 1:29 and races at 1:32s for the top 5 cars.
mk
#10
Rennlist Member
you are probably right. since the new cup cars are running even faster than speed GT now, I bet 1:29s are right on the money!
MK
MK
Originally Posted by jrgordonsenior
Mark I think the 997 cups will be into the 1:29's maybe even lower. It should be an exiciting weekend.....
#12
Rennlist Member
like I have been saying. 2 seconds for the fast guys (near 1:30s )and about 1 to 1.5 seconds for the slower cars (near 1:39 range)
speed GT is runnin 1:29.0 but i bet they get into the 1:28s by tomorrow's qual. cup cars will be right there too!
the track has places to make up time, it just didnt have before.
MK
speed GT is runnin 1:29.0 but i bet they get into the 1:28s by tomorrow's qual. cup cars will be right there too!
the track has places to make up time, it just didnt have before.
MK
#13
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
O.K. Mark give it up. Where are you making up time with the new paving?