Notices
Macan 2014-Current

2017 Macan Turbo PP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2024, 08:03 PM
  #31  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,315
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ///Bruce
From Bimmerpost.com:

The EA839 is not the same in the Macan, it's in the S4, SQ5 etc and has ring failures it seems. I'm not sure if the forged bottom end in the 2.9L variant has these issues, but there are serious issues with the S4/SQ5 platform. I have a buddy who dropped cylinder 4 and 5 just recently. Tuned ones have a tendency to drop #6. Call any local audi shop and ask them what they think of the EA839.


Edit: Here's some info form 034;


Their tune in particular seems to pop #6.
No offense but why would a BMW forum be an accurate source for Audi engine information?

The EA839 first went into Macans in 2019. That's 5+ years ago. There have been virtually no reported issues with that engine on here on Rennlist.
Old 07-30-2024, 08:07 PM
  #32  
///Bruce
Pro
 
///Bruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 619
Received 146 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
No offense but why would a BMW forum be an accurate source for Audi engine information?

The EA839 first went into Macans in 2019. That's 5+ years ago. There have been virtually no reported issues with that engine on here on Rennlist.
No offense taken. My response? So? Are you saying that unless it’s off a certified Porsche site it doesn’t matter? 😂
Old 07-30-2024, 08:25 PM
  #33  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,315
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ///Bruce
No offense taken. My response? So? Are you saying that unless it’s off a certified Porsche site it doesn’t matter? 😂
No, I am saying a BMW forum is not ideal, nor representative, of Audi information. And here on an actual Porsche Forum, the largest in the world, there have been zero EA839 issues reported.

You are writing of faults that don't exist.
Old 07-30-2024, 08:34 PM
  #34  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,315
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

A few, and I mean a few, early Audi cars had rocker issues. Nothing since then. Other problem all seem to stem from tunes or poor maintenance. The EA839 is solid.


Last edited by Carlo_Carrera; 07-30-2024 at 08:35 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Carlo_Carrera:
///Bruce (07-30-2024), chassis (07-31-2024)
Old 07-30-2024, 11:12 PM
  #35  
///Bruce
Pro
 
///Bruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 619
Received 146 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
No, I am saying a BMW forum is not ideal, nor representative, of Audi information. And here on an actual Porsche Forum, the largest in the world, there have been zero EA839 issues reported.

You are writing of faults that don't exist.
I’m not writing of any faults. And what makes you think because information regarding a Porsche engine posted on BMW forum should be dismissed? Really?
Old 07-31-2024, 05:40 AM
  #36  
Tim Cooper
Advanced
 
Tim Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bradfield, England
Posts: 73
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Appears to be some confusion, mine's a Porsche 2018 model year that came out of the factory after the summer break in 2017.

3604cc, M4635, 440 bhp.

Pretty sure that's correct?
Old 07-31-2024, 08:43 AM
  #37  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,315
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ///Bruce
I’m not writing of any faults. And what makes you think because information regarding a Porsche engine posted on BMW forum should be dismissed? Really?
If you’re not trying to point out faults, why did you bring it up in the first place?
Old 07-31-2024, 11:53 AM
  #38  
Draper
Rennlist Member
 
Draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 241
Received 52 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tim Cooper
Appears to be some confusion, mine's a Porsche 2018 model year that came out of the factory after the summer break in 2017.

3604cc, M4635, 440 bhp.

Pretty sure that's correct?
Correct. All 3.6L Turbo models had the M4635 for 2015-2018.

The PP (available for 2017-2018) is the same engine with different tuning which accounts for the extra ~40hp.
The following 2 users liked this post by Draper:
///Bruce (08-01-2024), Tim Cooper (07-31-2024)
Old 08-02-2024, 12:43 AM
  #39  
Xattica
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Xattica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 40
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Then, how soft or good is the M4635?
Old 08-04-2024, 09:51 AM
  #40  
chassis
Rennlist Member
 
chassis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: linker Fahrbahn
Posts: 4,243
Received 1,462 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

I stand corrected, mea culpa. 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee and 3.0SCV6 cold vee are not variants of the same engine with different induction types.

In this thread there has been no VAG documentation provided to substantiate technical specifications or naming convention for the 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee.

Non-VAG and therefore not credible sources refer to Mxx naming convention for the 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee. VAG documentation is given below for the EA837 3.0SCV6 cold vee and EA839 3.0T/2.9TTV6 hot vee engines.

In summary: avoid the 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee engine like the plague. The EA839 3.0T/2.9TTV6 hot vee is proving itself to be robust.

3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee and 3.0SCV6 cold vee use bedplate blocks. 3.0T/2.9TTV6 hot vee use more robust deep skirt blocks.

Porsche 3.0TTV6 cold vee:





EA837 3.0SCV6 cold vee



From VAG SSP 624 for the EA837 3.0SCV6 cold vee. No such document has been provided in this thread for the 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee engine.


EA839 SSP 655 . Pay close attention to "mono-turbo and biturbo" statement. This relates to the 3.0T and 2.9TT hot vee variants.

Last edited by chassis; 08-04-2024 at 10:39 AM.
Old 08-04-2024, 11:21 AM
  #41  
Draper
Rennlist Member
 
Draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 241
Received 52 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Porsche also lists different approved oils for the Macan 3.0/3.6L (A40) compared to the EA837 (C30), which is further evidence that there are meaningful differences between these engines.
Old 08-04-2024, 11:28 AM
  #42  
chassis
Rennlist Member
 
chassis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: linker Fahrbahn
Posts: 4,243
Received 1,462 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Draper
Porsche also lists different approved oils for the Macan 3.0/3.6L (A40) compared to the EA837 (C30), which is further evidence that there are meaningful differences between these engines.
On the other hand, VAG recommends C20 for EA839 3.0T and C30 for EA839 2.9TT and C40 for EA825 4.0TT in Cayenne installations. EA839 2.9TT has the highest bmep of the three Cayenne EA engine variants. Oil spec is inconclusive.

A Self Study document, as the two examples posted above, or other VAG-published document is conclusive. All else is guesswork.

Last edited by chassis; 08-04-2024 at 11:29 AM.
Old 08-04-2024, 11:32 AM
  #43  
Xattica
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Xattica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 40
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I think we (as a group) still without a final answer. So far the Macan 3.6TT is the EA837 or M4635? Based on the information above looks like the M4635. If is the M4XXX, how good is this engine. Obviously I don’t want to run everyday like in Nürburgring, but sometime is needed. The cayman engine looks more robust and ready for hard work than the Macan.

The Cayman is sold… now I’m looking for the next toy. Now I’m driving my crazy Land Rover LR3
Old 08-04-2024, 02:44 PM
  #44  
chassis
Rennlist Member
 
chassis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: linker Fahrbahn
Posts: 4,243
Received 1,462 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

The 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee, regardless of nomenclature, should be avoided for its well-known reputation for oil leaks.

Last edited by chassis; 08-04-2024 at 02:46 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Van Larson (08-10-2024)
Old 08-04-2024, 04:47 PM
  #45  
Xattica
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Xattica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 40
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chassis
The 3.0/3.6TTV6 cold vee, regardless of nomenclature, should be avoided for its well-known reputation for oil leaks.
Then, even many members are cool about the 2015-19 Macans, is not worth it? No matter how good the previous owner maintenance?



Quick Reply: 2017 Macan Turbo PP



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:21 AM.