981.2 GT4
#122
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It'll be interesting to see how long Ford, GM, and Lamborghini can hold on.
#123
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah, but that tech has peaked. Not because it's reached its theoretical limit, but because car manufacturers are not invested in NA engines anymore because of emissions testing standards. The cars listed above will be the last generation of high-revving NA engines that we'll likely ever see. Ferrari will be 100% turbo and/or hybrid when the F12 replacement hits; Porsche's GT division will likely be the same way with the 992 generation of cars; Aston Martin is making its last two NA cars in the GT8 and Vanquish S; and BMW and Mercedes have been 100% turbo/hybrid for a while already.
It'll be interesting to see how long Ford, GM, and Lamborghini can hold on.
It'll be interesting to see how long Ford, GM, and Lamborghini can hold on.
#124
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup, but if you were a Porsche bean counter, would you be OK with spending tens of millions on R&D for a naturally aspirated engine that will only be used in 5,000 cars? You want that cost amortized across as many units as possible. So while the laws allow for it, the economics of it don't make sense.
#125
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Ferrarisimo
Yup, but if you were a Porsche bean counter, would you be OK with spending tens of millions on R&D for a naturally aspirated engine that will only be used in 5,000 cars? You want that cost amortized across as many units as possible. So while the laws allow for it, the economics of it don't make sense.
#127
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don't forget your targets of 450 ft-lbs and 8,500 rpm too. No way to hit those targets with NA Flat-6 while simultaneously hitting power target on pump gas (fuel is the limiting factor for torque per liter).
#128
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the pccb's that are already in parts are enough brakes, suspension parts, few inches wider panels for wider tires and the parts bin Getrag tranny.
Yeah yeah, cannibalizes 911 sales... I don't believe that fallacy. People who want small midengine will buy the cayman. People that want classic 911 buy the gt3/rs.
And marketed as "we care about the driving experience, our customers who want a midengine get midengine, our customers who want rear engine get rear engine."
when I was shopping for the gt4 I looked at 997 gt3, 997 gt2, etc but wanted manual midengine. Harder and harder to find. Market proven to exist.
#130
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
christ just buy something dont like it sell it repeat life is so much better that way. some time i buy sell the SAME car not just the same model xar, but the SAAME car 3x in 2 years. try that. it' s very amusing... that's why i have silly grin all day forget going to shrink do above you will be happy
#131
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
hell, I woulda asked for 550tq and 9500rpm if it wasn't going to be a 200k motor. I think they could make an uber mid engine on a flat 6 that gets pretty darn close to 450/8500. A loaded gt4 can cost 105-110 msrp. I would gladly pay 150k-200k for the ultimate cayman. Thats a lot of cash for "lets fit a 4.2l from the new 3rs into a cayman"
Please give an example of an NA gasoline engine that runs on pump gas and passes emissions that produces 107 foot-pounds of torque per liter.
The current RS makes 84.75 ft-lbs per liter - expanding to 4.2L would make 356 ft-lbs with same specific performance.
#132
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry, but a 4.2RS NA motor is not going to be close to 450ft-lbs.
Please give an example of an NA gasoline engine that runs on pump gas and passes emissions that produces 107 foot-pounds of torque per liter.
The current RS makes 84.75 ft-lbs per liter - expanding to 4.2L would make 356 ft-lbs with same specific performance.
Please give an example of an NA gasoline engine that runs on pump gas and passes emissions that produces 107 foot-pounds of torque per liter.
The current RS makes 84.75 ft-lbs per liter - expanding to 4.2L would make 356 ft-lbs with same specific performance.
current gt3 makes 125/liter
current 3rs makes 123.x
458 Speciale does 137.x
edit. Sorry, you were talking torque.
Nothing comes close that I can recall. 458 Speciale 88.5... gt3 85.5.
Ok so my tq/hp wants arent reasonable given historical NA motor tech. Im good with GT3 hp/tq per liter in a 4.0/4.2 motor =)