Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

strut tower failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2016, 11:07 AM
  #166  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,297
Received 613 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buteo
So how many of these failures have we seen? I've read a bit through the thread and have only found a couple...or am I missing some.
That's a great question. Even if you include the 991 cars and the one I found on the Pistonheads forum, and those that had a severe crash-like impact are included, i think the total reported is around 5. But I have not done an exhaustive search and count, so caveat with that.

I had written off the other failures months ago as crash damage. But when Joe Weinstein reported his occurring while driving on public roads, I can't write it off any longer, at least not until we understand what caused Joe's to fail.

There's always the possibility that Joe's car suffered a suspension whack before it was delivered to him. There is just too much we don't know right now to make any conclusions.
Old 11-24-2016, 01:34 PM
  #167  
Buteo
Three Wheelin'
 
Buteo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,639
Received 41 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okie981
That's a great question. Even if you include the 991 cars and the one I found on the Pistonheads forum, and those that had a severe crash-like impact are included, i think the total reported is around 5. But I have not done an exhaustive search and count, so caveat with that.

I had written off the other failures months ago as crash damage. But when Joe Weinstein reported his occurring while driving on public roads, I can't write it off any longer, at least not until we understand what caused Joe's to fail.

There's always the possibility that Joe's car suffered a suspension whack before it was delivered to him. There is just too much we don't know right now to make any conclusions.
Agreed.

I feel like we all are searching for issues with this car. Some concerns are definitely warrantied (3rd gear issues) but im not completely sold on this strut problem. In fact, statsicially speaking I'm sure with all the cars (991/981/Gt3/4) with issues (say 5 or 10) I'm sure they would be viewed as outliers.

But with that said, I'm going to avoid pot holes!
Old 11-24-2016, 02:36 PM
  #168  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,895
Received 1,308 Likes on 608 Posts
Default

Good perspective above.

The nature (and consequences) of this failure make it one to take seriously, especially since we didn't see this failure in previous Porsches using steel strut towers. With that said, there are a lot of GT4s without this problem, and a looooooot of 981s and 991s without the issue. It may be a GT4 thing. It may be a 981/991 thing. It may be user error in some cases. It may be a bad batch of strut towers that will only affect a small group of cars. It may be a combination of all of the above, or none of the above. It may be a time bomb.

It's too early to know—but it's good to do what we can to find out more and maybe help prevent future failures at speed. Hopefully, this thread can become an "unsticky."
Old 11-24-2016, 11:49 PM
  #169  
Track Junkie
Advanced
 
Track Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 60
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It will be very difficult to determine what is actually causing this issue.
Drivers are likely to deny knowledge of what happened since that could exclude warranty coverage and become a very expensive insurance claim.
Since drivers are not going to admit hitting anything, we may never find out what actually caused the failure, at least until the warranty is over.
Old 11-25-2016, 12:40 AM
  #170  
4carl
Race Car
 
4carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: santa barbara
Posts: 3,858
Received 1,136 Likes on 605 Posts
Default

The GT4 doesnt have what they call the extra"spring" #6 on the PET (bump stop)that the 981 does. See post #62..I think what happens is the shock bottoms out and cracks the tower. There is less free travel on the GT4 because of the lower ride height. Thats probably why no bump stop. If you ever put shorter springs on a car they always tell you to cut the bump stop. carl
Old 11-25-2016, 05:02 AM
  #171  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,226
Received 230 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

delete
Old 11-25-2016, 09:28 AM
  #172  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,297
Received 613 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4carl
The GT4 doesnt have what they call the extra"spring" #6 on the PET (bump stop)that the 981 does. See post #62..I think what happens is the shock bottoms out and cracks the tower. There is less free travel on the GT4 because of the lower ride height. Thats probably why no bump stop. If you ever put shorter springs on a car they always tell you to cut the bump stop. carl
If it's true there's no additional spring, a.k.a. snubber, on the GT4, then by taking the PET at face value, neither does the GT3. I have to think there's some type of snubber on the GT cars but without seeing all the parts disassembled, I can't tell for sure.

Even so that would still leave potential differences in spring and damping rates as differences between GT3 and GT4 cars, as far as potential contributors to increased shock tower stress.
Old 11-25-2016, 10:02 AM
  #173  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,895
Received 1,308 Likes on 608 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okie981
Even so that would still leave potential differences in spring and damping rates as differences between GT3 and GT4 cars, as far as potential contributors to increased shock tower stress.
Also different weight distribution and considerably different mid/rear body structure. 981 coupe has a much smaller passenger cavity between its A- and C- pillars vs 991 coupe.
Old 11-25-2016, 10:12 AM
  #174  
4carl
Race Car
 
4carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: santa barbara
Posts: 3,858
Received 1,136 Likes on 605 Posts
Default

They all my be factors. My gut is the GT3 has a stiffer front spring. The stiffer the less the chance to bottom . A simple bump stop may be all thats needed to reduce the chance for the tower breaking if the shock bottoms out. The cast aluminum tower is very brittle not a great thing for absorbing sharp un-dampened impacts

May not totally eliminate it but would probably greatly reduce it. So in a situation like Joe's it wouldn't have failed?? carl
Old 11-25-2016, 10:26 AM
  #175  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,297
Received 613 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Also different weight distribution and considerably different mid/rear body structure. 981 coupe has a much smaller passenger cavity between its A- and C- pillars vs 991 coupe.
Yes, all good points.
Old 11-25-2016, 12:14 PM
  #176  
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Track Junkie
It will be very difficult to determine what is actually causing this issue.
Drivers are likely to deny knowledge of what happened since that could exclude warranty coverage and become a very expensive insurance claim.
Since drivers are not going to admit hitting anything, we may never find out what actually caused the failure, at least until the warranty is over.

I am going to have to react to this... This is like saying "Yes, the entire passenger compartment has collapsed, but we'll never know what the cause is, because there is no other damage to the chassis or fender or even the bumper, so if the driver had survived, he might have denied hitting anything so he didn't have to pay his insurance deductible."

I will gladly deduct or pay whatever the equivalent to what would have been my deductible and any possible rate increases and more, for this incident in exchange for a repair that removes the possibility of this casting being a brittle first failure.

I am surprised to hear that our car has no bump stops on the shocks. If there was one, even a sacrificial one-use crushable one to absorb one beyond-expected impact, there would simultaneously be a tell-tale and a protective crush zone for the core chassis of the vehicle. Maybe even wire it so the dash lights up if it's been crushed.

Joe

Last edited by Joe Weinstein; 11-25-2016 at 02:17 PM.
Old 11-28-2016, 07:30 PM
  #177  
MVEED3
Advanced
 
MVEED3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've trimmed internal bump stop on inversely-mounted monotubes. I've never come across internal bump stops on a twin. Does anyone know if the GT4 comes with mono or twin tube struts?

I'd like to believe I can keep tracking this car safely. It seems the only preventatives we can do for now are to:

1. Avoid suspect (and especially known) killer berms. Failure locations would help here.
2. Increase mating surface area of strut mount (aftermarket plate or mount).
3. Increase front spring rates without sacrificing bump travel.
4. Routine strut tower inspection.
5. Become intimate with checking ride height in a controlled setting that yields repeatable tolerance. Measure at similar conditions. Monitor ride heights for any unknown drop.

Last edited by MVEED3; 10-25-2018 at 01:49 PM. Reason: Updated list based on increased failure data
Old 11-30-2016, 02:54 PM
  #178  
JPR
Racer
 
JPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Miami, Fla.
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How has the factory responded to the owners who have had these failures? I don't know to what extent they can bring it back to factory condition.

Jpr
Old 11-30-2016, 09:55 PM
  #179  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,297
Received 613 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPR
How has the factory responded to the owners who have had these failures? I don't know to what extent they can bring it back to factory condition.

Jpr
Hopefully Joe Weinstein will have a report for how Porsche responds and it will be positive news. Not aware of any other "factory" responses so far. Someone earlier on this thread reported crash damage that was repaired back to like new, indistinguishable from before the damage, but at a reported cost of $30k.
Old 12-02-2016, 01:09 PM
  #180  
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I can only give a minor update for now. PNA is sending an expert to examine the car to decide about the warranty claim, but needs two weeks or so to get someone here. In the meantime, it sits at the approved body shop, taking up rack space for the poor owner who has been instructed not to touch it till then. I visited to bring him my battery charger for it so the battery is not degraded while we wait.


Quick Reply: strut tower failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:47 PM.