Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Forgeline GA1R with Track alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2016, 01:24 AM
  #31  
hellboy_mcqueen
Pro
 
hellboy_mcqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 540
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Great work!
And thx for sharing
Old 02-07-2016, 09:00 AM
  #32  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,479
Received 1,355 Likes on 826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
Alright - first day at TWS with this setup. TWS is a fast track, avg 90mph, pretty bumpy, some high G corners, and few spots with high compression as you transition onto and off of the original NASCAR oval.

We're running CCW today. Stiff mode. Front drivers side tire is rubbing a little on the metal 10-12oclock. Very slightly, and no where near what my .2RS had with 265s. Not rubbing on the other 3 corners.

No great lap times, 50s, and 51s, but, this car could easily get into the high 40s with R7s - I just don't have the ***** to carry the entry speed.

So net is that I'm happy with this setup, but it rubs a bit on extreme compression. Walk into it eyes wide open. I'd back off maybe 2-3mm on offset on the front if doing it again.
Could that rubbing be fixed by adjusting the caster and/or changing ride height?
Old 02-07-2016, 09:55 AM
  #33  
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

"We used shims with thrust-arm bushings to get this"...

I assume shims are standard Porsche parts for the purpose. Are thrust-arm bushings also?
For my format I can only use standard stuff. I would have to find an 8.5"x19" front because
we can't go wider than stock... But, yes, all the good tires are in 19".
Old 02-08-2016, 01:06 AM
  #34  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Shims are motorsports parts - not technically OEM, and the caster pucks are aftermarket.
Old 02-08-2016, 01:15 AM
  #35  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

I think the fronts would get a little more breathing room with 2-3mm offsetup change, or if I used camber plates to get the negative camber with fewer shims. I'm not worried about this, it worked well. If I order another set of wheels, I will change the offset a bit.

Rears are actually rubbing as you can see below - but the tire has no signs of rubbing - and I was not exactly babying the car around TWS. I am not sure what I would do give the rear some more space - 10.5" wheel is a non starter IMO, and and the offset is as close to that toe arm as I would get. If there were a low profile knuckle, I might change the offset by a couple mm.

Rear running - it looks like a lot, but you can't tell that the tire has touched anything. (Left is rear of car)
Name:  IMG_6006 (1).jpg
Views: 1186
Size:  255.7 KB

Front - again, it looks bad, but you can't tell it was rubbing. (Right is front of car)
Name:  IMG_6009 (1).jpg
Views: 1154
Size:  215.2 KB

Packed up and on the way home.
Name:  IMG_6013 (1).jpg
Views: 1186
Size:  329.2 KB
Attached Images  
Old 02-08-2016, 10:08 AM
  #36  
electron mike
Rennlist Member
 
electron mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,457
Received 628 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

Looks like minimal rubbing from those pics, do the tires show enough to concern you or is it superficial?

How was the grip compared to cup2s and your previous alignment? Any guess how much it improved your lap times?
Old 02-08-2016, 11:29 AM
  #37  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by electron mike
Looks like minimal rubbing from those pics, do the tires show enough to concern you or is it superficial?

How was the grip compared to cup2s and your previous alignment? Any guess how much it improved your lap times?
Rubbing:
Only one front tire (front left - I presume due to Turn10) showed signs of rubbing, but it was minimal and didn't pull any rubber off the tire. Hoosiers are pretty rounded on the edges.

Feel:
The whole car felt very good. The understeer is still there if you screw up your corner entry and still require front grip at the apex - but I think at this point I would not change a thing, I'd rather have more balance towards rear grip.

Wear/Alignment:
At TWS, the rear tire wear (-2.5 now) seemed very even with this alignment. The front (-3 now) could use another half degree, for a total of -3.5. This is looking strictly at tire wear, but TWS is like a cheese grater on tires. Temp profile shows that there might be too much negative camber in the rear, so I will be watching closely at COTA. The problem ultimately is that I may be giving up grip when the rear tires are loaded, which might be why the car likes to snap halfway to track-out or at apex under full power.

I corded a front Cup2 within 2 sessions at TWS back in December with the factory alignment. The hooisers look good enough after 7 sessions to survive a weekend at COTA with Chin.

Hoosiers vs Cup2:
LapTime wise, giving how little experience I have on the car, and with cup2s for that matter, it's difficult to tell what the difference is between cup2s and hoosiers is. This was the first time I really pushed the car and tried to have fun with it, and I've still got a lot of learn. It's reflexes are much faster, and it breaks loose much more abruptly than any street car I've driven...more like a race car. I'm not yet thinking ahead of the car, so I'm overly cautious. I would guess both tires are about the same given the level I am driving the car right now. There are at least 2 more "sack-up" seconds on the hoosiers at TWS, it will be easy to find those - but to go further I'm going to have to improve my skills on this platform.

Mostly rambling...sorry
Old 02-08-2016, 11:52 AM
  #38  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,479
Received 1,355 Likes on 826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
Feel:
The whole car felt very good. The understeer is still there if you screw up your corner entry and still require front grip at the apex - but I think at this point I would not change a thing, I'd rather have more balance towards rear grip.
What was your aero setup? Would the Gurney Flap from the Clubsport be something you'll look into? Will running less fuel help? Or a combination of both?
Old 02-08-2016, 11:57 AM
  #39  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
What was your aero setup? Would the Gurney Flap from the Clubsport be something you'll look into? Will running less fuel help? Or a combination of both?
Max-aero. You know, at this point, I think it's really about my driving style. I'll report back on how it goes at COTA.
Old 02-08-2016, 02:20 PM
  #40  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

More spring rate will help. Car is still sprung soft for R7's, or stock tires for that matter. I'd run 400/600 or 500/700 for dual purpose car, at minimum.

I just test fitted a rear BBS CH-R 19x10 ET38, and the fitment is perfect. 10.5" ET44 would be most ideal for 295's, but for off-the-shelf wheels, 10" will be fine.

The 10" gives plenty of room on both sides, matches outside clearance of stock, minus 1mm, so even better clearance.

I have ZERO plans to make compromises and fit an 11" wheel for 19" or 18" diameter, it simply isn't needed. If you are going to buy custom wheels in 18-19" diameter, go with 10-10.5" width in the rear....PERIOD.

Another point, for those with dual purpose cars, Michelin makes Sport Cup 2's in 245-35-19 and 285-35-19 which fit perfect on 8.5"/10" rims and is plenty of tire for the GT4, and a proven setup on 981's. Or go with 235/285 Nitto NT01's....

Last edited by Mvez; 02-08-2016 at 03:13 PM.
Old 02-08-2016, 02:24 PM
  #41  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
"We used shims with thrust-arm bushings to get this"...

I assume shims are standard Porsche parts for the purpose. Are thrust-arm bushings also?
For my format I can only use standard stuff. I would have to find an 8.5"x19" front because
we can't go wider than stock... But, yes, all the good tires are in 19".
I would assume they would look at shims as standard parts. The stock thrust arm bushings allow for adjustment, you don't need to buy solid caster/thrust arm pucks. When you dial in max shim's on the control arms to increase camber, your caster is going to jump up to 10 deg or so......then when you adjust the thrust arms again, it gets caster back in range and adds more camber.

you can probably get away with changing out the inner tie-rod ends on the front, and inner rear toe links to allow for max camber, and retain the "stock" outer, so upon inspection it looks stock.....lol.
Old 02-08-2016, 03:12 PM
  #42  
electron mike
Rennlist Member
 
electron mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,457
Received 628 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
It's reflexes are much faster, and it breaks loose much more abruptly than any street car I've driven...more like a race car. I'm not yet thinking ahead of the car, so I'm overly cautious. I would guess both tires are about the same given the level I am driving the car right now. There are at least 2 more "sack-up" seconds on the hoosiers at TWS, it will be easy to find those - but to go further I'm going to have to improve my skills on this platform.

Mostly rambling...sorry
Thanks for the insight, much appreciated! Do you feel the abrupt loss of traction is mostly the hoosiers or setup and tires? Mine on cup2s seems to break away predictably, but that could be because I am not going fast enough.
Old 02-08-2016, 05:06 PM
  #43  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by electron mike
Thanks for the insight, much appreciated! Do you feel the abrupt loss of traction is mostly the hoosiers or setup and tires? Mine on cup2s seems to break away predictably, but that could be because I am not going fast enough.
That's just a function of the lower polar moment of inertia than any car I've driven in anger. M3s and 911s rotate very slowly in comparison. 911 is a diabolical in that it will always rotate - period, you know its coming long before it happens, and as long as you are on power everything is fine - that's why everyone loves them.

This car is just different, I need to learn it. Takes some cycles. One other person I trust drove it and said it was the best handling car he's been in. He's a much better/faster driver than I am. I don't think it's the setup at this point.
Old 02-08-2016, 05:10 PM
  #44  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
More spring rate will help. Car is still sprung soft for R7's, or stock tires for that matter. I'd run 400/600 or 500/700 for dual purpose car, at minimum.

I just test fitted a rear BBS CH-R 19x10 ET38, and the fitment is perfect. 10.5" ET44 would be most ideal for 295's, but for off-the-shelf wheels, 10" will be fine.

The 10" gives plenty of room on both sides, matches outside clearance of stock, minus 1mm, so even better clearance.

I have ZERO plans to make compromises and fit an 11" wheel for 19" or 18" diameter, it simply isn't needed. If you are going to buy custom wheels in 18-19" diameter, go with 10-10.5" width in the rear....PERIOD.

Another point, for those with dual purpose cars, Michelin makes Sport Cup 2's in 245-35-19 and 285-35-19 which fit perfect on 8.5"/10" rims and is plenty of tire for the GT4, and a proven setup on 981's. Or go with 235/285 Nitto NT01's....
You are probably right. My dinosaur brain considers going to a narrow wheel and tire a compromise (i.e. why buy an RS when all it has is wider tires?) - but I don't have the wisdom to know any better, but I will get there through trial and error. At the moment this setup works well, and rubs nothing like my RS did with 335/265 tires.
Old 02-08-2016, 05:56 PM
  #45  
Jgarvish
Instructor
 
Jgarvish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ShakeNBake: Thanks so much for all your insight. I've been following your posts and appreciate all of the information you've shared.

I'm hoping to be out on COTA the last weekend in February with MVP. Currently getting my car aligned as well as getting new toe links and adjustable thrust arms (see pic) installed to help with toe and caster adjustment once I get increased camber. Also test fitting my Forgelines (19X9 ET 50 and 19X11 ET 47) and Hoosiers (265/35/19 and 295/30/19). Will update once I get my car back and have a chance to drive it.
Attached Images     


Quick Reply: Forgeline GA1R with Track alignment



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:14 AM.