Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

GT4 - Unlocking the Power Potential!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 09:33 PM
  #691  
DeerHunter
Burning Brakes
 
DeerHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 940
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Accel Junky
I always thought the same but this Edmunds compare shows nearly 3mph more from the PDK compared to the same care in manual:
Can't argue with empirical data. I wonder if this is borne out with other cars featuring standard and dual-clutch transmission options.
Old 05-14-2016, 10:16 PM
  #692  
bhk1004
Racer
 
bhk1004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Could be different gearing between pdk and the manual affecting acceleration times.
Old 05-14-2016, 10:16 PM
  #693  
IMOA
Instructor
 
IMOA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 168
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It makes sense if you think about it. When you're shifting you're till carrying the same speed so in terms of time over distance you don't lose much, it's just the difference that the extra mph would get you over say half a second for each shift. Measurable but really quite small. In terms of trap speed however you've effectively been accelerating for an extra 1.5 so that gives you quite a bit more. It's the same reason that PDK makes a much bigger difference in 0-60/0-100 times than quarter mile times, in a 0-60 comparison a gear change is the equivalent of standing still whereas on a quarter mile it isn't.
Old 05-20-2016, 03:34 PM
  #694  
Jenner
Burning Brakes
 
Jenner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1 hour from Lime Rock Park
Posts: 1,223
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

What's the latest update with the Stage 1 kit and/or 82mm TB issues and Cobb (or someone) fixing them?
Old 05-20-2016, 08:59 PM
  #695  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,453
Received 1,042 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IMOA
It makes sense if you think about it. When you're shifting you're till carrying the same speed so in terms of time over distance you don't lose much, it's just the difference that the extra mph would get you over say half a second for each shift.
Actually, when you shift you are decelerating for the duration of the shift.
Old 05-20-2016, 09:27 PM
  #696  
rraustin
Instructor
 
rraustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York City area
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having tracked a dual-clutch automatic for a few years, some observations:
Positive:
1. Depends on the shifts per lap, but faster shifts means being on power more
2. With dual-clutch you never lift when upshifting so more time spent at full power
3. Less mistakes with clutching, blipping, moving the shifter, can't accidently downshift at too high an rpm, results is more consistency. Of course if you are totally perfect with manual then this does not matter.....
4. Because shifts are very fast you can downshift to be at peak torque anywhere you need it. With manual you don't always have time so you stay in the higher gear which can be incrementally slower

Negative:
Dual-clutch weights 150 to 200 lbs more. The old drag racers rule of thumb says 150 extra pounds is like having 15 less horsepower
Old 05-20-2016, 09:41 PM
  #697  
kitwetzler
Rennlist Member
 
kitwetzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 396
Received 34 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jenner
What's the latest update with the Stage 1 kit and/or 82mm TB issues and Cobb (or someone) fixing them?
Hi guys,

I was working with Mitch@cobb to identify an issue - I was getting the CEL every single second drive cycle after resetting. This meant the CEL suppression for too much airflow wasn't working properly. They finally found a bug in the code and are updating the Accessport with those maps. I had driven 200 miles so the TB adaptation had happened normally but was still getting CELs.

I'm pleased to report that the Stage 1 maps that I was sent now cure the issue - it was purely cosmetic as the car ran fine with the CEL but it was pretty annoying. Anyway, it's fixed now. I put 80 miles and 6 drive cycles on the car and no issues since. No need to use a PIWIS at all, just make sure you have the updated maps - email Cobb if you have an AP and are having issues with this setup.

Hope that helps someone. (I haven't experienced the throttle hang issue but I also haven't done any track driving yet.)
Old 05-20-2016, 09:44 PM
  #698  
kitwetzler
Rennlist Member
 
kitwetzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 396
Received 34 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rraustin
Negative:
Dual-clutch weights 150 to 200 lbs more. The old drag racers rule of thumb says 150 extra pounds is like having 15 less horsepower
The 991 PDK is listed at 3219 and the 991.2 7MT is 3175. Much less difference than you might think. (the 991 uses basically the same gearbox for PDK and manual, although the deltas are similar)
Old 05-20-2016, 10:11 PM
  #699  
Jenner
Burning Brakes
 
Jenner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1 hour from Lime Rock Park
Posts: 1,223
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler
Hi guys,

I was working with Mitch@cobb to identify an issue - I was getting the CEL every single second drive cycle after resetting. This meant the CEL suppression for too much airflow wasn't working properly. They finally found a bug in the code and are updating the Accessport with those maps. I had driven 200 miles so the TB adaptation had happened normally but was still getting CELs.

I'm pleased to report that the Stage 1 maps that I was sent now cure the issue - it was purely cosmetic as the car ran fine with the CEL but it was pretty annoying. Anyway, it's fixed now. I put 80 miles and 6 drive cycles on the car and no issues since. No need to use a PIWIS at all, just make sure you have the updated maps - email Cobb if you have an AP and are having issues with this setup.

Hope that helps someone. (I haven't experienced the throttle hang issue but I also haven't done any track driving yet.)
This is great news!

So can I infer that Cobb fixed the CEL and removed the need for PIWIZ TB adaptation?
Old 05-21-2016, 01:16 AM
  #700  
kitwetzler
Rennlist Member
 
kitwetzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 396
Received 34 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jenner
This is great news!

So can I infer that Cobb fixed the CEL and removed the need for PIWIZ TB adaptation?
They fixed the CEL and I don't really think there is a need for PIWIS adaptation. Even the dealer that I asked to do it told me it probably wouldn't change anything if the car ran right (which it did.)

What is likely is that you'll throw a CEL at some point while the car is adapting but it should go away on it's own, or stay away once it's been cleared. Or, you can pay for the forced adaptation.
Old 05-21-2016, 02:08 AM
  #701  
bhk1004
Racer
 
bhk1004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

More worried if the throttle hang issue has been figured out vs cels..
Old 05-21-2016, 03:53 AM
  #702  
user1029
Drifting
 
user1029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,176
Received 558 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhk1004
More worried if the throttle hang issue has been figured out vs cels..
Agreed, I do rev match downshift a lot during my daily commute (I heel toe prior to right and left turns because racecar) with all my manual cars. I would not be good if the throttle hang left me careening toward incoming traffic or curb
Old 05-21-2016, 06:15 AM
  #703  
ralphmusic
Instructor
 
ralphmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 240
Received 48 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler
Hi guys,

I was working with Mitch@cobb to identify an issue - I was getting the CEL every single second drive cycle after resetting. This meant the CEL suppression for too much airflow wasn't working properly. They finally found a bug in the code and are updating the Accessport with those maps. I had driven 200 miles so the TB adaptation had happened normally but was still getting CELs.
I am not sure what the bold section from the Quote means.

Does this mean that the Cobb tune just stops the CEL warning, or does it actually change the mapping to take advantage of the extra airflow?
Old 05-21-2016, 10:32 AM
  #704  
cooperyau
Instructor
 
cooperyau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just ordered the race headers (without cats) so hopefully Cobb will be able to send the proper tune/map to both optimize the performance as well as eliminating any possible CEL. Has anyone recently worked with Cobb on similar header and tune?
Old 05-21-2016, 04:16 PM
  #705  
kitwetzler
Rennlist Member
 
kitwetzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 396
Received 34 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ralphmusic
I am not sure what the bold section from the Quote means.

Does this mean that the Cobb tune just stops the CEL warning, or does it actually change the mapping to take advantage of the extra airflow?
Both. The CEL warning suppression wasn't working, though, on my car.


Quick Reply: GT4 - Unlocking the Power Potential!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:19 PM.