Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cayenne Turbo S Front Brakes Renewal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2016 | 11:25 PM
  #31  
nychase's Avatar
nychase
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 230
Likes: 27
From: Milwaukee
Default

Yeah, thats what I was asking a few posts up if the amazon rotors are actually OEM? Has anyone here actually ordered them and compared them to OEM to be sure. Its certainly the best price!
Old 05-01-2016 | 08:23 PM
  #32  
hahnmgh63's Avatar
hahnmgh63
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 64
From: Roy, WA
Default

Definitely looks like OEM from the pictures. If they showed up and the rotors weren't OEM and exactly like the pics then I would say send them back.
Old 05-03-2016 | 01:48 PM
  #33  
John Veninger's Avatar
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 40
From: New Jersey
Default

Lowest price I could find for OEM
http://www.partsgeek.com/ss/?i=1&ssq...8676&x=16&y=15
Old 05-03-2016 | 11:29 PM
  #34  
hahnmgh63's Avatar
hahnmgh63
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 64
From: Roy, WA
Default

Looks like Parts Geek is the way to go.
Old 05-04-2016 | 12:05 AM
  #35  
nychase's Avatar
nychase
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 230
Likes: 27
From: Milwaukee
Default

So I may be grasping at straws here but the ones on amazon and parts geek aren't technically the OE part. Based on comparing the pictures this must just be a case of "missing the porsche (tax) sticker" but for some reason when I called sunset they dismissed the partsgeek products as aftermarket. I didn't think the guy was just trying to conjure business but he wasn't willing to price match.

The OP said he purchased his discs from Parts.com which lists the parts as OE with the correct retail price of $1,094. All the other non-porsche specialty sites show the retail price as $1,015.

I normally couldn't care less, just hate the confusion for what must be a particularly rare rotor....that and the 250 dollar difference (shipping included) between buying these rotors at sunset vs partsgeek.
Old 05-04-2016 | 05:11 PM
  #36  
docwyte's Avatar
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 543
From: denver, co
Default

I'm unaware of any aftermarket company making these discs. ECS Tuning only sells the OEM ones for instance...
Old 05-04-2016 | 06:06 PM
  #37  
John Veninger's Avatar
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 40
From: New Jersey
Default

PartsGeek one just arrived.







The following users liked this post:
frederickcook87 (08-06-2023)
Old 05-04-2016 | 09:02 PM
  #38  
hahnmgh63's Avatar
hahnmgh63
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 64
From: Roy, WA
Default

Looks about as OEM as you could get except the box that says Porsche on it.
Old 05-05-2016 | 12:11 PM
  #39  
nychase's Avatar
nychase
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 230
Likes: 27
From: Milwaukee
Default

Well...that confirms it.

The problem is not that I need the same function, I literally need the same rotor with all the same markings (I can explain my way out of missing the box/bag). I have a stealership willing to take all my supplied parts and install. If I bring all genuine parts they will notate that on the records. Since I don't know if/when I will ever sell the P!G I would prefer to keep as many records there as possible (sounds crazy, I realize).

For those who are wondering Here are the full part numbers for a 2009 Turbo S (not PCCB) from a representative at sunset who looked up my VIN.

Front:

955-351-401-61 Porsche ROTOR (x1)
955-351-402-61 Porsche ROTOR (x1)
955-351-939-52 Porsche FRONT PADS (x1)
955-612-365-51 Porsche WEAR INDICATOR (x2)
955-351-959-50 Porsche MOUNT KIT (x1)
N-906-854-03 Porsche HEX-HEAD SCREW 16X48 (x4)

Rear:

955-352-403-00 Porsche ROTOR (x2)
955-352-939-64 Porsche BRAKE PADS (x1)
955-612-365-71 Porsche WEAR INDICATOR (x2)
955-352-959-10 Porsche BRAKE PADS MOUNT KIT (x2)
N-105-556-02 Porsche PAN-HEAD SCREW 14X40 (x4)
The following users liked this post:
ShadetreeMech (11-08-2019)
Old 05-05-2016 | 04:20 PM
  #40  
spooltime's Avatar
spooltime
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 615
Likes: 63
Default

Originally Posted by 8202632
Hey spooltime quick question. What year is your CTTS? Mine is an 09 and the rear calipers are a pain and have to be removed b/c there is a non removable bar on mine instead of a pin. You are lucky to have your design.
Mine is a 2006. I had to remove my rear calipers in order to replace the discs, so I'm not sure I understand your comment. If it were pads only, then yeah, it would likely be easier.
Old 05-05-2016 | 05:50 PM
  #41  
RacingBrake's Avatar
RacingBrake
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 24
From: Fullerton, CA
Default

OE rotors weigh almost 40 lbs each (even heavier than X6's 38 lbs).

Anyone here would weigh in on rotor weight saving to improve the braking efficiency?
Old 05-05-2016 | 11:33 PM
  #42  
8202632's Avatar
8202632
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 87
From: Memphis, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by spooltime
Mine is a 2006. I had to remove my rear calipers in order to replace the discs, so I'm not sure I understand your comment. If it were pads only, then yeah, it would likely be easier.
Yes was talking about pads only. I have to remove the rear calipers just to do the pads
Old 05-06-2016 | 12:17 PM
  #43  
docwyte's Avatar
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 543
From: denver, co
Default

RacingBrake, just interested but what's the reason why you made the rotors thinner than OEM? That and the fact that the OEM rotors are cheaper than yours makes it a hard decision to buys yours instead...
Old 05-06-2016 | 02:42 PM
  #44  
RacingBrake's Avatar
RacingBrake
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 24
From: Fullerton, CA
Default

OEM rotors were made with standard cast iron, for lighter vehicles they are fine but for heavy SUV they get warped easily, so instead of using better iron they simply increased the volume of the rotor - make them bigger and thicker but too heavy of a rotor can truly make the car under-performed - Cayenne is no difference.

RB is the only brake company makes OE replacement brake rotors with improved design and material, instead of copying from OE sizes and metallurgy like others.

First our cast iron are alloyed and heat treated to improve the dimensional stability prevent it from warping and cracking under heat stress.

Second our vane design is of curved vane and directional (vs. OE's straight vane and non-directional) for a much more efficient air cooling to further reduce the change of rotor deformation and per-mature failure.

http://www.racingbrake.com/v/main/technology.asp





Our rotors are "directional" made of best casting metallurgy (alloyed and heat-treated) with better designs. So your choice can either be:
  • The same heavy/bulky & non performing OE replacement.
  • Or from RB who has built true high performance two piece light weight rotors for the toughest America's super muscle cars such as Corvette, Camaro, CTS-V, Challenger/Viper etc. since early 2000.

Why we don't offer 38mm thickness because we think it's nu-necessarily oversized. When we design a disc, air gap and friction plate thickness is our main criteria than the total thickness.

Just compare some similar OE replacement that we offer for the comparable SUV (size indicated are OE sizes), and look the weight table for weight reduction to OE.

Mercedes ML63 AMG (390x36mm): 36 lbs
RB 390x36mm - 28 lbs (saves 8 lbs per rotor)


http://www.racingbrake.com/Mercedes-.../mb-irk-03.htm

Jeep G-C SRT8 (380x34mm): 33.2 lbs
RB 380x34mm - 24.7 lbs (saves 8.5 lbs per rotor)


http://www.racingbrake.com/Two-Piece.../jp-irk-01.htm

BMW X5/X6 (395x36mm): 38 lbs
RB 400x34mm - 28 lbs (saves 10 lbs per rotor)


http://www.racingbrake.com/RB-400-38...bmw-irp-17.htm

See our complete brake replacement / upgrade for SUV:
http://www.racingbrake.com/category-s/7278.htm

Reviews:

World's First: RacingBrake 2-Piece Brake Rotors ...

The Ultimate Rotating & Unspring Mass Reduction Thread ...

Hope above explanation and our brake build credential for SUV can prove our competency in our brake offer for Cayenne.

Please feel free to check these SUV forums and ask about how RB two piece rotors performed and advise if you have any further questions.
Old 05-07-2016 | 11:20 AM
  #45  
docwyte's Avatar
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 543
From: denver, co
Default

Hmm. I'd much rather have a rotor that's the same size as OEM. I haven't found the braking performance of my CTTS to be lacking in the slightest and while I understand the advantages of having a lighter rotational mass, on a SUV that weighs what this one does it's just not that important to me.

If your rotors were 38mm like OEM and less costly than OEM than I'd consider buying them...


Quick Reply: Cayenne Turbo S Front Brakes Renewal



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:52 AM.