Ultimate VTG engines
#346
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Very impressive power and performance, what weight are you running for that 4s 100-200 and how much boost for those dyno numbers ?
When does the boost peak on the road, that 4000rpm peak on the dyno is surely not correct, it should be boost at 2200rpm and full torque by 3000rpm ? also can I ask how long that dyno run takes, is it an 8 second jobbie or does it get decent loading ?
Thanks for sharing
When does the boost peak on the road, that 4000rpm peak on the dyno is surely not correct, it should be boost at 2200rpm and full torque by 3000rpm ? also can I ask how long that dyno run takes, is it an 8 second jobbie or does it get decent loading ?
Thanks for sharing
#347
Rennlist Member
Very impressive power and performance, what weight are you running for that 4s 100-200 and how much boost for those dyno numbers ?
When does the boost peak on the road, that 4000rpm peak on the dyno is surely not correct, it should be boost at 2200rpm and full torque by 3000rpm ? also can I ask how long that dyno run takes, is it an 8 second jobbie or does it get decent loading ?
Thanks for sharing
When does the boost peak on the road, that 4000rpm peak on the dyno is surely not correct, it should be boost at 2200rpm and full torque by 3000rpm ? also can I ask how long that dyno run takes, is it an 8 second jobbie or does it get decent loading ?
Thanks for sharing
1200kg empty, like 1350kg with fuel and me
The dyno is correct..
The motec logg says the same.. i have full boost at 3500rpm
Its a 5 gear pull with no brake ,it takes around 6 sec
I could have loaded it if we wanted but thats not how its done here if we like to compare
They dynoed a RS tuning gt3 , 1 week before 5hp and 5nm was the diffrence
PS: I was looking through your 3,9 liter VTG dyno papper and you have 734hk@6260rpm and 921nm@4220rpm why should my little 3,6 liter have max torque 1200rpm before yours..?
And i dont think you fully understand the beniffit of running E85
Last edited by Rickard 993 Turbo; 12-04-2015 at 02:12 PM.
#348
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Turbo cars chassis dyno differently to NA cars, the 1100NM is a clue also if you have full boost at 3500 the dyno does not show this because of the lack of loading. I think you can disregard the low down torque numbers, unless the engine is braked properly like in a manufacturer measurement but maybe the maximum power is correct, certainly your performance indicates it is !
On VTGs mine was reaching full boost by 2500rpm, this is benefit of 3.9 and engine dyno accurate tuning.
Can you explain the benefits of the E85 compared to just 99RON ?
On VTGs mine was reaching full boost by 2500rpm, this is benefit of 3.9 and engine dyno accurate tuning.
Can you explain the benefits of the E85 compared to just 99RON ?
Last edited by TB993tt; 12-05-2015 at 04:12 AM.
#349
Rennlist Member
Im very confident the dyno is correct i have dyno turbos and gt2 before there the numbers are right
http://www.speedhunters.com/2015/04/...about-ethanol/
I can run like 5-10 degrees more timing
I'm running intake temps at 30-35 degrees
I know you are sceptical to everything and you are right to be, some of the USA numbers are a yoke but some time other people are right and can be better then you
I did test the E85 before the dyno and it was more like E95 so thats like +115okt RON
http://www.speedhunters.com/2015/04/...about-ethanol/
I can run like 5-10 degrees more timing
I'm running intake temps at 30-35 degrees
I know you are sceptical to everything and you are right to be, some of the USA numbers are a yoke but some time other people are right and can be better then you
I did test the E85 before the dyno and it was more like E95 so thats like +115okt RON
Last edited by Rickard 993 Turbo; 12-05-2015 at 07:58 AM.
#350
Rennlist Member
Here I a clip from the car at Mantorp,look at 1,58-2,20 and you can se the acceleration and speedometer
Here is a 100-200km/h log 4,37 with big lift off and 1 shift 3 to 4
Here is a 100-200km/h log 4,37 with big lift off and 1 shift 3 to 4
#351
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
"People can be better than you"
Err yes you are better than me - congrats
You are into your racing and have a lightweight fast car which is great for you but 8 second chassis dyno runs do not measure turbo torque accurately and this looks to be the case with your 1100NM. Show me a loaded Hub dyno and I'll gladly tell you again how much better than me you are
Err yes you are better than me - congrats
You are into your racing and have a lightweight fast car which is great for you but 8 second chassis dyno runs do not measure turbo torque accurately and this looks to be the case with your 1100NM. Show me a loaded Hub dyno and I'll gladly tell you again how much better than me you are
#352
Rennlist Member
"People can be better than you"
Err yes you are better than me - congrats
You are into your racing and have a lightweight fast car which is great for you but 8 second chassis dyno runs do not measure turbo torque accurately and this looks to be the case with your 1100NM. Show me a loaded Hub dyno and I'll gladly tell you again how much better than me you are ��
Err yes you are better than me - congrats
You are into your racing and have a lightweight fast car which is great for you but 8 second chassis dyno runs do not measure turbo torque accurately and this looks to be the case with your 1100NM. Show me a loaded Hub dyno and I'll gladly tell you again how much better than me you are ��
This dyno messerue turbo accuratley on turbo cars, they have done oem messurment for Nissan and Honda so they are very accurate, so no issoue with Turbo and NA cars
But for you I will put load on it next time, but next time its without VTG im going with bigger turbos now but still E85
#353
Rennlist Member
My car spools up a little later then other VTG cars, but thats of the exhoust camshaft i have timed diffrently to get more torque/hp on higher RPMS, if you look it doesnt drop of as drastic to others.. better for track use..
#354
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Measuring OEM turbo motors is often accurate on these dynos because of the factory tuning so that OEM will give that torque number loaded or unloaded but an ace mapper can easily get more torque (measured)on an unloaded dyno which would disappear with a proper braked measurement - the whole snake oil tuning industry is based around this !
having said all that I am not writing off your 1100NM claims but they just don't reach my measurement standards....
Next time you are at the ring book in with Manthey and get them to test your engine on their Maha rig, those guys know how to load an engine
having said all that I am not writing off your 1100NM claims but they just don't reach my measurement standards....
Next time you are at the ring book in with Manthey and get them to test your engine on their Maha rig, those guys know how to load an engine
#355
Rennlist Member
Okey.. understand what you are saying..
remove 200nm then if you think thats more accurate, but we dont have a simmular car to compare agaisnt so its hard to say right or wrong..
But the dyno and the track/street are the same with when the boost comes and etc..
No Nur for me with this car, its to fast and not setup for the Nur..
remove 200nm then if you think thats more accurate, but we dont have a simmular car to compare agaisnt so its hard to say right or wrong..
But the dyno and the track/street are the same with when the boost comes and etc..
No Nur for me with this car, its to fast and not setup for the Nur..
#356
Rennlist Member
Okey.. understand what you are saying..
remove 200nm then if you think thats more accurate, but we dont have a simmular car tocompare agaisnt so its hard to say right or wrong..
But the dyno and the track/street are the same with when the boost comes and etc..
No Nur for me with this car, its to fast and not setup for the Nur..
remove 200nm then if you think thats more accurate, but we dont have a simmular car tocompare agaisnt so its hard to say right or wrong..
But the dyno and the track/street are the same with when the boost comes and etc..
No Nur for me with this car, its to fast and not setup for the Nur..
#357
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I always recommend reading through this site in particular "the column" , really explains a lot about power train measurement.
http://www.rri.se/index.php?DN=38
#358
Rennlist Member
One thing i did notice in the Durametic logg from your pulls
Is that you boost falls of, my boost hold 1,55 to redline..
I know you car is a street car and need to meat the regulations and etc, just intressting to compare..
Is that you boost falls of, my boost hold 1,55 to redline..
I know you car is a street car and need to meat the regulations and etc, just intressting to compare..
#359
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
What is interesting (to me ) is that on vmax days my 320kph IATs are very similar ~55C (for 15-20C ambient) whether the boost is 1.05bar at high revs or 1.2bar which suggests that the engine is still doing the same amount of thermal work regardless of the boost and this is borne out by similar vmax top speeds.
When stamping on the throttle my program gives a big overboost up to 1.4 bar for a few seconds even at higher revs....
Todd's strategy is fix the boost and tune around it, it is a simpler concept but he's been doing it for 25 years and has it very refined. I always worry that this strategy can cause big problem if on a very hot day the IATs get critical and the fuelling + ignition adjustments do not lower it adequately but I think there is an ignition cut off available in the program for that eventuality.