Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Ferrari wins at Long Beach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2008, 01:14 PM
  #1  
OldGuy
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
OldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest Idaho
Posts: 10,466
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Ferrari wins at Long Beach

This is the 2nd class win in a row for ferrari. I hope these wins have Porsche get alittle bit more aggressive with the MkII GT-3 design.
Old 04-21-2008, 02:29 PM
  #2  
ZAPmobile
Rennlist Member
 
ZAPmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hillsborough, North Carolina
Posts: 889
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Porsche did not loss the race on the track, they lost it in the pits. On the last round of pit stops the Ferrari got out a little quicker.
Old 04-21-2008, 02:32 PM
  #3  
SpeedGeek
Pro
 
SpeedGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It bothers me that Porsche may be seeing the limits of what it can do with a rear-engine, 6-cylinder n/a design. I would hate to see the 911 become something else, but the competition isn't getting any slower...
Old 04-21-2008, 02:34 PM
  #4  
OldGuy
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
OldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest Idaho
Posts: 10,466
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Speed, I think there is still room in there for a 3.8 etc etc
Old 04-21-2008, 02:50 PM
  #5  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,429
Received 5,663 Likes on 2,330 Posts
Default

i "heard" that porsche cannot do > 4.0 on flat six. i am no engineer so i dont know.

but if DFI, higher compression, higher rpm and 3.8L is all they got for the 911, then porsche will be history in no time. as GT3 gets to 3.8L, f cars and z06 can also increase displacement, compression and DFI. and ferrari has already got the paddle shifting thing down cold. and at 4.3L their V8 has a lot more potential now then our flat six....

like i said before, i am VERY INTERESTED to see what porsche has AFTER the 3.8L, DFI, PDK... as those technology can only get porsche to par, far from being a leading contender..

and you all know i am a p car die hard.
Old 04-21-2008, 03:37 PM
  #6  
SpeedGeek
Pro
 
SpeedGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
i "heard" that porsche cannot do > 4.0 on flat six. i am no engineer so i dont know.
I think even 4L may not be possible. I'm not sure, but it probably has to do with the difficulty of accelerating / decelerating such large pistons at really high rpm.

I'm hoping those rather brainy German engineers will figure out how to put a flat-8 back there for the 998. Of course, with all the green politics happening right now, it's possible things will change completely one way or another. Ferrari is certainly talking about lighter and smaller rather than bigger and more powerful.
Old 04-21-2008, 03:46 PM
  #7  
Spyderidol
Racer
 
Spyderidol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mozambique
Posts: 393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The current RSR is already a 3.8L
Old 04-21-2008, 03:49 PM
  #8  
h-bo
Instructor
 
h-bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpeedGeek

I'm hoping those rather brainy German engineers will figure out how to put a flat-8 back there for the 998. Of course, with all the green politics happening right now, it's possible things will change completely one way or another. Ferrari is certainly talking about lighter and smaller rather than bigger and more powerful.
I also like to think that everything could change because of green politics forcing some truly revolutionary design rather than simple developments of proven models. i am confident porsche has the brains to do something spectacular. i hope ferrari is serious about small and light... it could get really excited about cars again.
Old 04-21-2008, 03:50 PM
  #9  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,429
Received 5,663 Likes on 2,330 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyderidol
The current RSR is already a 3.8L
i know. but street cars are only at 3.6.
the 3.8 RSR aren't doing so hot right now in ALMS.
Old 04-21-2008, 04:01 PM
  #10  
Spyderidol
Racer
 
Spyderidol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mozambique
Posts: 393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes , it does seem that they are not doing so well at first glance.
If however, we examine their performance more closely, we see the following:

They took Pole at St. Pete and at Long Beach (new track record)
At Long Beach they had the two fastest race lap times.
The quickest RS was almost 0.5 seconds quicker than the second Porsche and the quickest Ferrari.

The 997 are really not doing well in the "other" series (FIA GT and LMS) but they have only had their first race in each of these series, so hopefully they'll get better.
Old 04-21-2008, 04:05 PM
  #11  
porschemeister
Rennlist Member
 
porschemeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SanFrancisco
Posts: 409
Received 42 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

ALMS equates the performance by weight, restrictor size etc. The RSR has been restricted power wise with two 29.5 mm restrictors! There is still room, put they are at the mercy of IMSA the sanctioning body. They don't want to make changes on the fly based on one race.

The Porsche was consitently faster than the 430 (Patrick Pielet mainly) so from IMSA's perspective there is need to adjust anything. Have a look at the qualifying times.

Porsche elected to go with 14" rear tires (with weight penalty) to offset the disadvantage of the rear engine.

Watch out, you will see Porsche in the winners circle again soon.

GT2 racing cannot be left uncontrolled, otherwise you will have cost explosion which will kill the race teams.

The race was lost because Flying Lizard elected to change all four tires at the last pit stop. If they would have changed the rears ony (which is all what was needed) they would have come out of the pits 7 sec faster.
Old 04-21-2008, 04:15 PM
  #12  
SpeedGeek
Pro
 
SpeedGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When you think about it, the 911 is pretty amazing. The Ferraris are made of aluminum, they are mid-engined, and they have very smart electronic differentials. The 911 is like a Flintstones car in comparison. Disregarding engine performance, do you guys think the 911's chassis design can stay competitive?
Old 04-21-2008, 05:52 PM
  #13  
MJones
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

MEXICO CITY GT Podium

1. Pontiac GXP-R
2. Pontiac GXP-R
3. Porsche GT3 Cup

GP of Miami

1. GXP-R
2. GT3 Cup
2. GXP-R

Daytona 24 Hr

!. Mazda RX8
2. GT3 Cup
3. GT3 Cup
Old 04-21-2008, 06:44 PM
  #14  
fc-racer
Drifting
 
fc-racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 2,438
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just imagine a small displacement flat-8 howling at 8,500rpm; we can dream right?
Old 04-21-2008, 06:52 PM
  #15  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,429
Received 5,663 Likes on 2,330 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porschemeister
ALMS equates the performance by weight, restrictor size etc. The RSR has been restricted power wise with two 29.5 mm restrictors! There is still room, put they are at the mercy of IMSA the sanctioning body. They don't want to make changes on the fly based on one race.

The Porsche was consitently faster than the 430 (Patrick Pielet mainly) so from IMSA's perspective there is need to adjust anything. Have a look at the qualifying times.

Porsche elected to go with 14" rear tires (with weight penalty) to offset the disadvantage of the rear engine.

Watch out, you will see Porsche in the winners circle again soon.

GT2 racing cannot be left uncontrolled, otherwise you will have cost explosion which will kill the race teams.

The race was lost because Flying Lizard elected to change all four tires at the last pit stop. If they would have changed the rears ony (which is all what was needed) they would have come out of the pits 7 sec faster.
yes, with you in ALMS next year, i'll bet some money on p for sure
not dissing p cars and i KNOW the qual time and saw the pit mistake (of course hindsight is 100%) and understand how p lost or rather gave away the trophy. but the point is p now see a LOT more competition when they were once miles ahead of everyone. we didn't see any corvettes or reliable ferraris or bmw's anywhere close to 911's in the 70's 80's. i dont want to just see porsche win, i want to see them blow their opponents out the water.


Quick Reply: Ferrari wins at Long Beach



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:13 AM.