Pair a 997 Turbo with a 997S ?
#16
eh.. depending on lifestyle maybe it works. I have two cars. Both coupes. One is the 997 GTS.. the other one is quicker, AWD, and turbocharged. Similar enough to the idea proposed in OP. Not a 911 though. I don't see anything wrong with it.
I prefer a RWD coupe though. I'll probably add a 991.2 Carrera (not sure what kind) at some point.. so I can get a 911 with a turbo but still keep RWD
I prefer a RWD coupe though. I'll probably add a 991.2 Carrera (not sure what kind) at some point.. so I can get a 911 with a turbo but still keep RWD
#19
#20
I test drove one in 2014 back to back with my C2S and surprisingly I actually preferred my C2S - it felt much more agile and light - would definitely miss this car if I were to trade. The 911 Turbo would be a bit of a trophy purchase - I certainly don't need it.
Then there is the new 911's all being all turbo - that bothers me but I don't think it will take away from the 911 Turbo icon but I also don't think it will help depreciation.
Track use no longer interests me as much - cutting down to maybe 1 event per year - too much risk with these nice machines rather toss around a cheap 944 and save the stress.
Then there is the new 911's all being all turbo - that bothers me but I don't think it will take away from the 911 Turbo icon but I also don't think it will help depreciation.
Track use no longer interests me as much - cutting down to maybe 1 event per year - too much risk with these nice machines rather toss around a cheap 944 and save the stress.
#21
If I'm going to have 2 cars I prefer them to be wildly different so I can change up the driving experience and appreciate the unique characteristics more. I recently supplemented my 997 with an early Land Rover Discovery and have been really enjoying it.
#22
Slowly talking myself out of this haha.
#27
I test drove one in 2014 back to back with my C2S and surprisingly I actually preferred my C2S - it felt much more agile and light - would definitely miss this car if I were to trade. The 911 Turbo would be a bit of a trophy purchase - I certainly don't need it.
Then there is the new 911's all being all turbo - that bothers me but I don't think it will take away from the 911 Turbo icon but I also don't think it will help depreciation.
Track use no longer interests me as much - cutting down to maybe 1 event per year - too much risk with these nice machines rather toss around a cheap 944 and save the stress.
Then there is the new 911's all being all turbo - that bothers me but I don't think it will take away from the 911 Turbo icon but I also don't think it will help depreciation.
Track use no longer interests me as much - cutting down to maybe 1 event per year - too much risk with these nice machines rather toss around a cheap 944 and save the stress.
#28
#29
Here is the devil that tempted me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uLRx2e2BHk
What's the normal turbo oil pressure on a mostly cold engine - this one was showing 2.5 bar. My non-turbo idles at 3.5 bar when the oil temp is 200 degrees or higher.
Also, first dash warning was low fuel. Wonder what the 2 warning messages and beeps after that one were.....
#30
As for depreciation, that's a topic that gets debated weekly over in the 997 Turbo forum. I think everyone agrees that while it won't appreciate like the 993 Turbos did, it probably is at or very near the floor and will not depreciate much more from here. I bought mine thinking it would be a car that I can own, drive, maintain, and then sell maybe 5-10 years down the road for essentially what I paid for it. If it goes up in value, great... but I don't see these dipping below $50K, especially not with the 996s starting to rise in price a little bit.
Given that last point, you probably could buy one now, drive it for a year or two and sell it for what you paid if you find you don't like having two fairly similar cars. Though, if it were me, I'd either sell the 997S or forget the idea of the Turbo... I wouldn't have both together.