Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Seriously looking at purchase of 997, need advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2013, 10:16 PM
  #16  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sqweak
Why would you tell someone to avoid an engine with improved economy, higher power, and eliminated IMS/RMS issues?
Carbon buildup.
Old 01-16-2013, 10:19 PM
  #17  
CAVU
Rennlist Member
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,909
Received 375 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris from Cali
Carbon buildup.
With an open mind I ask, why would the DFI engine incure anymore carbon build up than and manifold injection?
Old 01-16-2013, 10:23 PM
  #18  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

It has been a big problem in DFI RS4s and BMWs (cars from 2007 or so). Unless Porsche has a magic trick, it'll get the same issue. Here's some scoop:

Old 01-16-2013, 10:25 PM
  #19  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Sorry for the infomercial at the end. Bottom line, the first minute and a half are truth.
Old 01-16-2013, 10:31 PM
  #20  
MessyMarvin
Rennlist Member
 
MessyMarvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southwick, MA
Posts: 1,013
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The 997.2 Porsche has been out since 2009 and I did significant research with not one Carbon issue to be found, just because Audi or BMW has it does not mean anything.

Your comment has nothing what so ever to back it up, the IMS/RMS has plenty.
Old 01-16-2013, 10:35 PM
  #21  
CAVU
Rennlist Member
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,909
Received 375 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris from Cali
Sorry for the infomercial at the end. Bottom line, the first minute and a half are truth.
I appreciate your sharing the source of your opinion. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. For me, it's an infomercial from the start until I see something presented that's independent with data from repeatable testing.

Cheers.
Old 01-16-2013, 10:41 PM
  #22  
CtrUSA
Instructor
 
CtrUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's a little bit too general to recommend.
I have a 997.2 C2S and wouldn't want a 997.1. I think generally you might find some 997.1 owners who might recommend a 997.2 - not so sure you'll find the opposite.
The one downside of the 997.2 I can think of is exhaust note. That's an as remedy though with more value options; X-over, Fister mod, or going cat-back exhaust such as Tubi or others (I went Tubi and the only issue with cost I have s not doing it earlier).
Then there is always the $$$. All things being equalt - I'd rather have a 997.2 with 50k than a 997.1 with 35k assuming equal sale price.
Old 01-16-2013, 10:42 PM
  #23  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MessyMarvin
The 997.2 Porsche has been out since 2009 and I did significant research with not one Carbon issue to be found, just because Audi or BMW has it does not mean anything.

Your comment has nothing what so ever to back it up, the IMS/RMS has plenty.
Really? So a negative response counts as a positive result? The carbon buildup (as I noted) came on cars from as far back as 2007. It takes a little time (not overnight). I've seen a ton of photos and stories from friends about the buildup in their heads from the DFI. As I mentioned, unless Porsche is doing something differently, it's bound to happen. It's a function of how it works. The fuel doesn't have a chance to clean off the valves since it's sprayed directly into the combustion chamber.

Read this: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7...s-of-car-tech/

Important part for the tl;dr crowd:
Additionally, some owners and maintainers of GDI engines (particularly higher-performance, turbocharged models) have reported that direct-injection systems see increased carbon buildup in backsides of their intake valves, resulting in reduced airflow and performance over time. A quick Google search yields page after page of anecdotal reports of this issue. The buildup occurs because in most cars intake air is, frankly, kind of dirty -- even with air filters in place, modern exhaust gas recirculation systems and crankcase vent systems can add quite a bit of muck to the intake charge -- and without port injectors spraying gasoline (and the detergents that it contains) onto the valves, things can get pretty filthy over the course of many thousand miles.
I'm really not an idiot, and I don't hate DFI. I owned a 2009 C4S, a couple of DFI GTIs, and a DFI Golf R. It has a ton of advantages. I just didn't want to deal with the high-pressure injectors and carbon buildup 20-30 years from now (my 997 is a keeper). I hope this helps "back it up".
Old 01-16-2013, 11:44 PM
  #24  
SteveFromMN
Pro
 
SteveFromMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Porsche took almost 10 years to develop a completely new engine for the 997.2. They are also using this engine now in the turbo something they did not do with the old design. Either you think Porsche knows what they are doing or you don't. If you don't why own one? My bet is they did a **** load of testing and this is one strong engine and a big improvement over the old one used in the 997.1 and 996. I would spend the extra money and go with the 997.2 in a heart beat.
Old 01-17-2013, 12:06 AM
  #25  
Kurt RSF
Rennlist Member
 
Kurt RSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 37
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default 997

I have one of each: 2005 S Cab, and 2009 S Cab. Both have been utterly reliable. No concerns about either one being out of warranty, but then I'm the original owner, so I know the car's history. Never a problem, most reliable brand of car I own.

There's always improvement and technological advancement. The 2009 has more power, much better electronics (Bluetooth, touch screen PCM, iPod interface, sat radio with traffic information), but I enjoy them equally.
Old 01-17-2013, 12:15 AM
  #26  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 235 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleA
Hey, I have never posted here but have been a member for almost a year. Mostly I have been over looking at the marketplace. So, I find myself getting serious about a 2009 C2S. In general, I am looking for advice from all who have some to give. I have been looking at 997.1 and 997.2 but believe I like the .2 if I can get to it financially.

So, what do I need to know about these cars before I dive off the cliff?

Thanks in advance,
You state that you are trying to swing a .2 if you can 'get to it financially' -- there's not that much of a difference in prices often and if that is what can break the bank maybe a 997 is not for you. You must be prepared to put decent tires on it and maintain it to avoid issues down the road.
Old 01-17-2013, 12:33 AM
  #27  
cvtbenhogan
Rennlist Member
 
cvtbenhogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 1,119
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I really like the .2 The exterior update is fresh and the PCM is improved for the gadgets.
More importantly, there is a nice performance boost and the .2 S is one fast car. PDK would be the best reason to opt for the .2

That said, the 997.1 is a real bargain now and it's a great car. It's really a question if $10 to $15k more for a newer .2 is worth it. Drive both!!

For me it wasn't and I found a great 997.1S (knock on wood). If I change my mind, I'll just get a .2 with no regrets.

I don't think you can go wrong with either version if its been taken care of.
Old 01-17-2013, 12:35 AM
  #28  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I would probable go with a 997.2 non s version instead of the 997.1 S. If price is a deciding factor. They are both about the same hp and you get the newer more reliable motor and electronics.
Old 01-17-2013, 12:48 AM
  #29  
Sharkys
Advanced
 
Sharkys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No need for CPO. Just get a PPI from a reputable shop. You are just prepaying anyway -upfront. That's my two cents.
Old 01-17-2013, 08:49 AM
  #30  
wheeler
Rennlist Member
 
wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: KC Area
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I'm in the same boat with my search. Was on the .1 C2S vs. .2 C2 fence. Almost immediately after the first of the year, the prices seemed to drop a little more and a number of .2 C2S cars and are now out there in the $62-58k range and continuing to dip down. Figure since it's winter I'll keep searching a little longer, get a few more lease return 2009's in, more 991's on the road, etc. Anyway, I'm thinking .2 C2S now for sure. Only thing I could see changing that is if I found an 06-08 low mile car in the low $40's...but currently most are smoking crack on their .1 inventory prices.


Quick Reply: Seriously looking at purchase of 997, need advice



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:25 AM.