Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porsche: Not made for the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2011, 04:10 PM
  #151  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
i do not disagree - Porsche could have done more. I blame new corporate strategy they have for all this. They think too much of quaterly reports these days and much less of their customer base. Now with most new sales coming from China etc markets it will probably get even worse as that market will eat anything and produce mor profits than sooo picky north american market.
In addition to the number of cars sold in Asia and the growth expectations, Auto companies, including Porsche, get MUCH higher prices for their cars in those markets than in the US. We have the longest warrantees and the lowest prices. It is best more many companies to concentrate on growing, more profitable markets.
Fahrer is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 03:39 AM
  #152  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,477
Received 1,018 Likes on 724 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Huey
On the other issue in this thread, it's my understanding that BMW will not deny a claim for warranty simply because it happened at a HPDE event. As long as the engine wasn't over-rev'd and proper maintenance and lubricants are used, they will pretty much honor warranty claims during the warranty period and often provide non-warranty assistance whenever "unusual" breakdowns occur if there is evidence that maintenance was up-to-date.
That's what bugs me about Porsche's policy too. They can easily confirm whether or not a car with a blown engine has been maintained as recommended and whether or not it was driven beyond approved limits but they choose to ignore that and disqualify all warranty claims that can be traced to track use. What are the qualifiers anyway? If I putter around the track at 3000 rpm to get familiar and the engine grenades, it won't be covered under warranty because of the pavement I drove on? If not, then why would anything change if I drove the same track pushing the limits without ever breaching redline?
sandwedge is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:31 AM
  #153  
jason74
Instructor
 
jason74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If these cars aren't designed for track use off of the showroom floor, why do we know the Nurburgring lap time of the 991 C2S already? Especially that it is the same or faster than the 997 GT3...
jason74 is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:43 AM
  #154  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I think that we should keep in mind is that track time is really rough on these, or any, cars. Not just brakes and tires but the suspension, trans, engine and body. Serious race cars are heavily modified and are expected to be re-built often. Prototype cars are designed to perform at extreme levels but need extreme maintenence and repairs. The warranty we get with out cars is for street use. If these cars ( including the GT models) were truly optimized by the factory for track or race use, you could not drive them legally on public roads and much more likely not be able to afford to buy tem. Plus..... no warranty

So, yeah, they are not meant to be tracked or raced. ( OK, maybe a little)
Fahrer is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 12:06 PM
  #155  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

no, it is just manufacturer who decided to apply 'conditions' to warrantied items.

there is an ECU and DME to record overrevs, if engine was operated within its limits it must be warrantied no matter why failure occured. end of story. all those 'tracked' excuses are an ultimate BS. same BS as with insurance companies having 'clauses' for damage on a track.

same of my freaking homeowners insurance that will not pay for a leaky sewer connector pipe. all same crap - they want to take your money and give as little as posible in return. same as with all 'act of god' clauses. if they only could it would be no warranty at all...
utkinpol is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 02:34 PM
  #156  
AYHSMB
Instructor
 
AYHSMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All manufacturers have exclusions in their warranty contract. They have to do that to legal protect themselves if a customer really abuses the car and then sues for warranty coverage. But very few have been as nit-picky about applying the exclusions when they were obviously not the problem as Porsche has.

When someone has an IMS failure or oil-starvation issue or scored cylinder or whatever in an M97/96 engine, it's never the customer's fault. It's an inherent flaw in the engine. Even if they have some over-revs on their DME that shouldn't be an excuse to deny it, because Porsche knows perfectly well that those problems are due to their engineering.

It would be nice if the M97 didn't have these problems. But that's not really the big deal - a lot of engines have issues - it's how Porsche has handled the problem that is really distressing.
AYHSMB is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 06:08 PM
  #157  
Minok
Drifting
 
Minok's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,415
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The whole point of the 'may not be covered by warranty' is that its telling you you don't get a blanket warranty protection if tracking the car.. that they will look more closely into WHY the item failed.

A warranty is there to cover for manufacturing defects, not to provide for the owner to get fixed anything that manages to break for whatever reason. If something breaks at a track day and Porsche knows from data its an issue that happens with some general subset of its cars, so they know its not you having done something that specifically caused your car to fail that you should have known to avoid, then I would think they cover the failure.

If you blow the engine at the track and its traced to a failure that has only ever occurred on your car and they can find no defect in the engine parts, they probably won't cover it.
Minok is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:16 PM
  #158  
kosmo
Race Director
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

when's there going to be a Hitler spoof on the IMS issue?

the LOVE the one w/ the Nissan GTR

kosmo is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 09:44 AM
  #159  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

That was hilarious!
Fahrer is offline  



Quick Reply: Porsche: Not made for the track



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:44 AM.