Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone using 10W60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2010 | 10:41 AM
  #16  
LlBr's Avatar
LlBr
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 13
Default

I have a seven page TSB on Porsche recommended oils. Problem is it's from 2006. Anyway, this is an old list but Lubro Moly is not on the list (see below). Maybe go back and tell your local expert to STFU and stop recommending stuff that's not on the list.

I'd just go to your dealer and ask to look at the newest oil TSB. If the oil's not on the list don't use it.
Attached Images  
Old 06-29-2010 | 11:35 AM
  #17  
nick49's Avatar
nick49
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 24
From: Out West
Default

Generally speaking, thicker heavier oils cause a motor to run hotter. The oil shearing away from itself causes friction and heat, more so in thicker (higher vis #s) oils. Thicker oils move and flow slower with more resistance and do a poorer job of conducting heat away from critical areas. For this reason, heavier oils will make a motor more resistant to rev quickly and effortlessly. Thicker oils were originally made for racing applications years ago, when machined finishes of critical components were much coarser, friction greater and internally generated heat.

Idealy, you want to use the thinnest oil that still delivers enough film strength to offer complete protection to your motor. I have found the major benefit of thick oils to be that of surpressing mechanical motor noises, and little beyond that.

Try what works and makes you happy, owners are harder to please than motors ;-)
Old 06-29-2010 | 11:40 AM
  #18  
LlBr's Avatar
LlBr
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by nick49

Try what works and makes you happy, owners are harder to please than motors ;-)
Sir, with all due respect. Things are complicated, Porsche did the work and knows the engine therefore Porsche's preferences should be obeyed by us amateurs.

There was that "Oil Bible" a few years back. Amazing how many considerations go into oil.

not sure if this is it but it's something:

http://hyperformancecycles.net/oil_bible.pdf
Old 06-29-2010 | 12:35 PM
  #19  
alexb76's Avatar
alexb76
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 83
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by LlBr
I have a seven page TSB on Porsche recommended oils. Problem is it's from 2006. Anyway, this is an old list but Lubro Moly is not on the list (see below). Maybe go back and tell your local expert to STFU and stop recommending stuff that's not on the list.

I'd just go to your dealer and ask to look at the newest oil TSB. If the oil's not on the list don't use it.
Lubro Moly High Tech 5W40 is Porsche A40 approved. Not the 10W60 though.

You actually got it listed, it's the "Liqui Moly", same thing!
Old 06-29-2010 | 12:37 PM
  #20  
LlBr's Avatar
LlBr
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
Lubro Moly High Tech 5W40 is Porsche A40 approved.
Old 06-29-2010 | 12:50 PM
  #21  
kosmo's Avatar
kosmo
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 6
From: THE Republic
Default

i dont understand and the fascination w/ the "cold" weight and why anyone would use anything other than "0" weight. Every mechanic i know has told me that most of the engine wear occurs at start up. Anyhow, if one is driving under "normal" operating conditions, ie street 100c/212f, 0w-40 is fine. If one is operating above the temp range, then a racing oil is needed. And if one is REALLY hardcore, heat the oil beforehand.
Old 06-29-2010 | 12:56 PM
  #22  
LlBr's Avatar
LlBr
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by kosmo
Every mechanic i know has told me that most of the engine wear occurs at start up.
That's why the 5w would make more sense than the 0w, right? Assuming you're in not in a cold climate, the thicker oil would provide more cushioning for the large clearances of the cold metal parts during start up. I "learned" Porsche recommends 0w only to meet emission standards not for our engine's longevity. I could have "learned" wrong though.
Old 06-29-2010 | 01:15 PM
  #23  
johnwb's Avatar
johnwb
Racer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

AlexB,
On your question about how much brake fluid you need for a flush.
Two liters. The tech will need a little more than one liter to do the job. You'll have some left over.
Old 06-29-2010 | 01:29 PM
  #24  
alexb76's Avatar
alexb76
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 83
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by johnwb
AlexB,
On your question about how much brake fluid you need for a flush.
Two liters. The tech will need a little more than one liter to do the job. You'll have some left over.
I am getting three bottles, 1.5 litres. Is that enough? I searched around and most people said 2 bottles was enough.
Old 06-29-2010 | 01:34 PM
  #25  
kosmo's Avatar
kosmo
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 6
From: THE Republic
Default

Originally Posted by LlBr
That's why the 5w would make more sense than the 0w, right? Assuming you're in not in a cold climate, the thicker oil would provide more cushioning for the large clearances of the cold metal parts during start up. I "learned" Porsche recommends 0w only to meet emission standards not for our engine's longevity. I could have "learned" wrong though.
actually not really. both 5w and 0w are still too thick at cold startup , say 75F,
But the 0w will have a lower Centistokes value than the 5w.
Old 06-29-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #26  
cbzzoom's Avatar
cbzzoom
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 617
Likes: 1
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
I am getting three bottles, 1.5 litres. Is that enough? I searched around and most people said 2 bottles was enough.
1L is actually enough to fill, it's a question of how much they need to flush out the old stuff. Some people will use 1L of cheaper stuff to flush then 1L of the good stuff to fill, but you have to make sure they are compatible (not all are) so it's safer just to use all the same stuff.
Old 06-29-2010 | 02:52 PM
  #27  
alexb76's Avatar
alexb76
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 83
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by cbzzoom
1L is actually enough to fill, it's a question of how much they need to flush out the old stuff. Some people will use 1L of cheaper stuff to flush then 1L of the good stuff to fill, but you have to make sure they are compatible (not all are) so it's safer just to use all the same stuff.
Ok, I also have a set of older Motul 5.1 (same stuff but less boiling point), that will use for flushing the old stuff. 1.5 should be fine then.
Old 05-09-2015 | 07:32 PM
  #28  
fatfat's Avatar
fatfat
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 2
Default

I just change my oil to LM 10W60 only because I have score bore and don't want to repair it for now. 2006 C2 3.6 with 99kilom in Ontario. I was burning about 1 liter per 1000 kilometers of castrol 5W50. It sounds louder when Iam revving because it is quieter at idle.
It idles at 2 1/2 bars now. These are fun cars but what a ****ty crappy design to make mr P extra billions!
The following users liked this post:
AlexGR_ (08-03-2022)



Quick Reply: Anyone using 10W60?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:10 PM.