End to the oil change after break-in debate
#31
Thank you for sharing your analysis - I don't expect changing the oil more frequently then Porsche's recommendations is harmful to the car, but at the same time, I struggle to see a connection between doing that and reduced maintenance costs down the road.
For 997/996 boards, we can read hundreds of posts on failed MAFs, window regulators, ignition switches, minor oil leaks, leaky coolant reservoirs, a hole in the radiator, failed radio, etc, but I can't recall a post where an engine rebuild/major service was brought on early because someone stuck to, and did not exceed, the manufacturer's oil change recommendations.
But maybe the goal isn't to reduce longterm engine maintenance costs, maybe the OP's goal is to be satisfied that he keeps his engine in as perfect a condition as he can, and this makes him enjoy the car more - in that case, the goal is being met.
For 997/996 boards, we can read hundreds of posts on failed MAFs, window regulators, ignition switches, minor oil leaks, leaky coolant reservoirs, a hole in the radiator, failed radio, etc, but I can't recall a post where an engine rebuild/major service was brought on early because someone stuck to, and did not exceed, the manufacturer's oil change recommendations.
But maybe the goal isn't to reduce longterm engine maintenance costs, maybe the OP's goal is to be satisfied that he keeps his engine in as perfect a condition as he can, and this makes him enjoy the car more - in that case, the goal is being met.
#32
AFAIK the catastrophic engine failures on the 997 have largely been the result of IMS issues which are not oil related. RMS failures, again not oil related. Typically what goes wrong in these cars are the electronic compenents i.e., absolutely nothing related to the frequency of oil changes.
Granted there are all sorts of people on this board who are smarter than the Porsche engineers (they told us so themselves) so who are we to question them?
Granted there are all sorts of people on this board who are smarter than the Porsche engineers (they told us so themselves) so who are we to question them?
#33
Race Director
Particle size is an important consideration, and the report does not give information on this.
For example, if these metal contaminants average 10 microns in size, and typical engine clearances are 100 microns, I would expect the metals to do little damage - they would flow around with the oil. On the other hand, if the particulates are comparable in size to the engine clearances, then there would be more abrasion.
I would expect that engine designers have thought this through. "If engine clearances are X, then we should specify engine oil filters that remove particles greater than Y to minimize engine wear." The manufacturers should know what X and Y are.
Particles much smaller than Y may be indicative of engine wear, but they do not necessarily contribute to additional wear.
The test lab should also be asked for a particle size distribution, but I suspect that this is difficult to obtain at the concentrations we are talking about.
For example, if these metal contaminants average 10 microns in size, and typical engine clearances are 100 microns, I would expect the metals to do little damage - they would flow around with the oil. On the other hand, if the particulates are comparable in size to the engine clearances, then there would be more abrasion.
I would expect that engine designers have thought this through. "If engine clearances are X, then we should specify engine oil filters that remove particles greater than Y to minimize engine wear." The manufacturers should know what X and Y are.
Particles much smaller than Y may be indicative of engine wear, but they do not necessarily contribute to additional wear.
The test lab should also be asked for a particle size distribution, but I suspect that this is difficult to obtain at the concentrations we are talking about.
Then one must consider the cam lobe and valve lift bucket. The only clearance this interface has is the thickness of the film of oil that manages to develop between the lobe and the bucket face. At this interface pressures can approach 170,000psi (and higher for other engines with heavier valve springs). The oil film is not exceptionally thick on a good day.
The oil film at the upper end of the cylinder between the rings and the cylinder wall varies considerably too. And the oil film that must exist between the piston ring groove walls and the sides of the ring.
And God only knows what oil film thickness exists in the zero lash hardware and the VarioCam Plus oil operated pins that lock the two camshaft followers together or unlock them.
Then there is the oil film thickness between the chain rollers and the chain sprocket, the oil film thickness between the rollers and the inner pin, and lest we not forget the zero thick oil film between the bearing ***** of the IMS bearing the the bearing races.
Lastly we have an oil pump that has to pump this oil, over 60 liters of it per minute, and the oil pump gets the oil before it is filtered. Over the life of the engine the oil pump could pump nearly 36,000,000 liters of oil.
Sincerely,
Macster.
#34
Intermediate
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for sharing the interesting data. At what point do you plan to change the oil again? I hope you analyze the oil from you next oil change for comparison and post the results. I would anticipate much more normal levels of contaminants which will support that the cost of the oil change is well worth the expense. It's intuitive to believe that it's helpful to get rid of the assembly debris as soon as possible. How much does the analysis cost? $20? Thanks again.
#35
Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
AFAIK the catastrophic engine failures on the 997 have largely been the result of IMS issues which are not oil related. RMS failures, again not oil related. Typically what goes wrong in these cars are the electronic compenents i.e., absolutely nothing related to the frequency of oil changes.
Granted there are all sorts of people on this board who are smarter than the Porsche engineers (they told us so themselves) so who are we to question them?
Granted there are all sorts of people on this board who are smarter than the Porsche engineers (they told us so themselves) so who are we to question them?
Consider, the manual for a cup car using a nearly identical engine calls for oil changes much more frequently, in fact a Cup car used for racing is supposed to have the engine rebuilt every 40 hours (996 Cup). A 996 GT3 using the same engine has a 4 year 50,000 mile warranty. Does this suggest that perhaps track use stresses the engine and its lubricants more than a cruise on the highway?
Sustained operation at high revs is normal on track and virtually impossible on the street. All manufacturers recommend more frequent oil changes based on severe service. I suggest you inform yourself of change intervals suggested by those same engineers for cars used for racing. Cars used for both street and track should use change intervals between the two extremes which is what those of us who own and drive these cars do. What do you drive?
Regards,
#36
Three Wheelin'
While there's a lot of apples-and-oranges going on in this thread, it really all comes down to - who do you believe.
I've always tried to evaluate the advice I get (on any subject I might not be well-versed in) based, in part, on the agenda of the person giving the advice.
Just because a carpenter might recommend a hammer to solve every problem, doesn't mean the discussion has to end there.
As quantifiable as these "elements" in oil may be, what the amounts mean to the way you drive is still a matter of interpretation. It's not a fact/fiction dichotomy.
Of course, I could be wrong. It's happened before (earlier in this thread, apparently).
I've always tried to evaluate the advice I get (on any subject I might not be well-versed in) based, in part, on the agenda of the person giving the advice.
Just because a carpenter might recommend a hammer to solve every problem, doesn't mean the discussion has to end there.
As quantifiable as these "elements" in oil may be, what the amounts mean to the way you drive is still a matter of interpretation. It's not a fact/fiction dichotomy.
Of course, I could be wrong. It's happened before (earlier in this thread, apparently).
....magnetic drain plug and oil analysis is exactly that.... and I think blackstone has enough experience in the game to tell us what the threshold values are.... but that's a good point you may want to contact them directly concerning this... however... if you don't analyze your oil... your playing in the dark...
#37
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW the magnetic oil plug is only good for ferrous based metals i.e. iron, steel, etc. not aluminum, copper, brass, lead, nickel, etc. The point being that you could develop a false sense of security if you depend upon the presence or absence of material on the plug as an indicator of engine health.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
Last edited by CarGuy21; 12-21-2009 at 10:38 AM. Reason: additional data
#38
Three Wheelin'
BTW the magnetic oil plug is only good for ferrous based metals i.e. iron, steel, etc. not aluminum, copper, brass, lead, nickel, etc. The point being that you could develop a false sense of security if you depend upon the presence or absence of material on the plug as an indicator of engine health.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
#39
BTW the magnetic oil plug is only good for ferrous based metals i.e. iron, steel, etc. not aluminum, copper, brass, lead, nickel, etc. The point being that you could develop a false sense of security if you depend upon the presence or absence of material on the plug as an indicator of engine health.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
These engines have cylinder sleeves so they're not like the old Vega engines where the pistons are running in aluminum cylinders. The crankshafts are either cast iron or forged steel (I don't know which) so the only sources of ferrous metals are the cylinder sleeves, crankshaft, camshafts and oil pump.
#40
FWIW, Porsche allows a huge amount of variation in oil consumption from engine to engine. Up to 1.6 qts per 622 miles!!!? What does that mean? I don't know but maybe it's safe to bet that every NEW engine is different as far as clearances (and quality and longevity?) are concerned. So there may not really be a standard from which to judge a 95% good brand new engine from a 75% good brand new engine: both will wind up in cars at factory.
#41
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the 997 engines do not have sleeves ( unless they were repaired). The cylinders are aluminum with Nikosil(?) ( for the 997.2) or Lokasil coating on the aluminum cylinder surfaces ( for the 997.1). Both have proved to be durable. I think the Vega invloved a number of design fiascos.
#42
Pro
Thread Starter
#43
Pro
Thread Starter
Thanks for sharing the interesting data. At what point do you plan to change the oil again? I hope you analyze the oil from you next oil change for comparison and post the results. I would anticipate much more normal levels of contaminants which will support that the cost of the oil change is well worth the expense. It's intuitive to believe that it's helpful to get rid of the assembly debris as soon as possible. How much does the analysis cost? $20? Thanks again.
Blackstone's basic test is $22.50 - worth it to see the health of an engine.
#45
Pro
Thread Starter