Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 with 100k, any point in worrying about the biggies (IMS/Bore scorting)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2023, 04:38 PM
  #1  
somethingclever
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
somethingclever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 105
Received 46 Likes on 25 Posts
Default 997.1 with 100k, any point in worrying about the biggies (IMS/Bore scorting)

title kind of says it all. I'm looking to buy a 997.1 with 100k on it, build date makes it likely but unkown if it has the serviceable IMS but no record of it being done. Having owned a high mileage 996 it seems like if the IMS was going to go it would have gone by 100k was the consensus, and I'm assuming bore scoring is somewhat the same?
I plan to ask for a DME report as part of the PPI but I'm wondering if it's worth doing leakdown?
Old 12-19-2023, 04:46 PM
  #2  
BmacIL
Racer
 
BmacIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Illinois
Posts: 337
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Do the PPI so you know what you're starting from. Bore score is an eventuality but depending on its history could be prolonged quite a long time if driven and taken care of properly. As far as IMS bearing, do it when it's time for a clutch.
Old 12-19-2023, 05:10 PM
  #3  
somethingclever
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
somethingclever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 105
Received 46 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I guess bore scoping is the trick for the PPI, yes?
The following users liked this post:
Tj40 (12-19-2023)
Old 12-19-2023, 06:06 PM
  #4  
Tj40
Burning Brakes
 
Tj40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,020
Received 203 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Yes absolutely
Old 12-19-2023, 08:25 PM
  #5  
groovzilla
Rennlist Member
 
groovzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: seattle, washington
Posts: 17,528
Received 4,966 Likes on 2,938 Posts
Default

My 2006 C4 has 107,000 miles
I bought it with 106K miles. Had PPI and through the Spark Plug Holes and cylinders are all clean - Car was garaged all it's life and feels/looks like new.
Make sure you get PPI & Bore Scope Inspection for sure.

Old 12-20-2023, 08:30 AM
  #6  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 26,181
Received 6,705 Likes on 4,262 Posts
Default

There is no safe mileage for a small single row IMS bearing - they can fail at 30k miles or 130k miles. At the current mileage plan to install a new clutch and the IMS solution into your purchase price. If when you get in there, you have the larger single row IMS, remove the outer grease seal, know you're good on the clutch for another 60-80k miles and enjoy the peace of mind, and your new car
The following 2 users liked this post by Petza914:
johnodee (12-20-2023), Robocop305 (12-22-2023)
Old 12-20-2023, 09:53 AM
  #7  
groovzilla
Rennlist Member
 
groovzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: seattle, washington
Posts: 17,528
Received 4,966 Likes on 2,938 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by somethingclever
title kind of says it all. I'm looking to buy a 997.1 with 100k on it, build date makes it likely but unkown if it has the serviceable IMS but no record of it being done. Having owned a high mileage 996 it seems like if the IMS was going to go it would have gone by 100k was the consensus, and I'm assuming bore scoring is somewhat the same?
I plan to ask for a DME report as part of the PPI but I'm wondering if it's worth doing leakdown?
Here is the Engine Serial# designation for the smaller more prone IMS Bearing and Larger more robust Bearing:

Engine#'s for IMS Bearing size:
The smaller IMS Bearing in the 3.8L motors are in motors up to M97/01 68509790 ---> Engine#'s from M97/01 68509791 forward have the larger revised more robust IMS Bearing.
For 3.6L motors, if the engine# s M96/05 69507476 and higher it has the larger more robust IMS bearing.
Old 12-20-2023, 09:54 AM
  #8  
groovzilla
Rennlist Member
 
groovzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: seattle, washington
Posts: 17,528
Received 4,966 Likes on 2,938 Posts
Default

I also suggest you have your PPI & Bore Scope Inspection performed at Aker's Porsche on Capitol Hill.
They are my 37 year Porsche Specialist Indy shop and best around.

What year is the 997 you are looking at? Hw many miles and is it manual transmission?




Old 12-20-2023, 12:45 PM
  #9  
somethingclever
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
somethingclever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 105
Received 46 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by groovzilla
I also suggest you have your PPI & Bore Scope Inspection performed at Aker's Porsche on Capitol Hill.
They are my 37 year Porsche Specialist Indy shop and best around.

What year is the 997 you are looking at? Hw many miles and is it manual transmission?
It's in California, so I'm having that done down there. it's a 2005, 10X,000 miles, 6MT
Old 12-20-2023, 12:47 PM
  #10  
somethingclever
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
somethingclever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 105
Received 46 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petza914
There is no safe mileage for a small single row IMS bearing - they can fail at 30k miles or 130k miles. At the current mileage plan to install a new clutch and the IMS solution into your purchase price. If when you get in there, you have the larger single row IMS, remove the outer grease seal, know you're good on the clutch for another 60-80k miles and enjoy the peace of mind, and your new car
Do you have some data on that? I've only been on the forums for a couple of years but I haven't heard of any IMS failures at 100K+

Unfortunately the previous owner did the clutch at 90K and for some dumb reason (unless it is the larger IMS) didn't do it at that time.
Old 12-20-2023, 12:48 PM
  #11  
somethingclever
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
somethingclever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 105
Received 46 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by groovzilla
Here is the Engine Serial# designation for the smaller more prone IMS Bearing and Larger more robust Bearing:

Engine#'s for IMS Bearing size:
The smaller IMS Bearing in the 3.8L motors are in motors up to M97/01 68509790 ---> Engine#'s from M97/01 68509791 forward have the larger revised more robust IMS Bearing.
For 3.6L motors, if the engine# s M96/05 69507476 and higher it has the larger more robust IMS bearing.
Thx I saw that in the stickies. Plan to check the engine number when it's PPI'd
Old 12-20-2023, 12:53 PM
  #12  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 26,181
Received 6,705 Likes on 4,262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by somethingclever
Do you have some data on that? I've only been on the forums for a couple of years but I haven't heard of any IMS failures at 100K+

Unfortunately the previous owner did the clutch at 90K and for some dumb reason (unless it is the larger IMS) didn't do it at that time.
That's what Jake from FSI and Lee from Hartech have seen and posted about. They're both in a 997 Engine Builders group on Facebook
Old 12-20-2023, 02:55 PM
  #13  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,535
Received 1,196 Likes on 618 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petza914
There is no safe mileage for a small single row IMS bearing - they can fail at 30k miles or 130k miles. At the current mileage plan to install a new clutch and the IMS solution into your purchase price. If when you get in there, you have the larger single row IMS, remove the outer grease seal, know you're good on the clutch for another 60-80k miles and enjoy the peace of mind, and your new car
I'll add there is no "safe" mileage for an IMS bearing, however how the car has been driven and maintained does have a lot to do with how long the original lasts beyond the physical differences between all the factory IMS bearings.

Even if the car has the non-serviceable IMS, it still needs to have the grease seal removed as part of preventative maintenance.

https://lnengineering.com/products/t...s-bearing.html
The following 2 users liked this post by Charles Navarro:
groovzilla (12-20-2023), jchapura (12-20-2023)
Old 12-20-2023, 02:58 PM
  #14  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,535
Received 1,196 Likes on 618 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by somethingclever
title kind of says it all. I'm looking to buy a 997.1 with 100k on it, build date makes it likely but unkown if it has the serviceable IMS but no record of it being done. Having owned a high mileage 996 it seems like if the IMS was going to go it would have gone by 100k was the consensus, and I'm assuming bore scoring is somewhat the same?
I plan to ask for a DME report as part of the PPI but I'm wondering if it's worth doing leakdown?
In my opinion, leakdown and compression numbers are not as important as bore scoping the engine for scoring. Can't hurt to do those tests as well, but bore scoping is more important. I've seen engines with good leakdown and compression numbers have bore scoring.

All PPIs should also include a manometer test on these engines to ensure you have a value of 4-6" of h2o.
The following users liked this post:
jchapura (12-20-2023)
Old 12-20-2023, 03:01 PM
  #15  
groovzilla
Rennlist Member
 
groovzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: seattle, washington
Posts: 17,528
Received 4,966 Likes on 2,938 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
In my opinion, leakdown and compression numbers are not as important as bore scoping the engine for scoring. Can't hurt to do those tests as well, but bore scoping is more important. I've seen engines with good leakdown and compression numbers have bore scoring.
All PPIs should also include a manometer test on these engines to ensure you have a value of 4-6" of h2o.
Was just about to Post a Thread---->Cam Deviation is becoming more frequent especially in the Cayenne's.




Last edited by groovzilla; 12-20-2023 at 03:08 PM.


Quick Reply: 997.1 with 100k, any point in worrying about the biggies (IMS/Bore scorting)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:32 AM.