Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Looking for opinion on Rev Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2020, 06:40 PM
  #1  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default Looking for opinion on Rev Report

Looking at a 997.1. The seller did a PPI 2.5 yrs ago and here's the data:

Number of ignitions in Range 1: 22014 - 1090.3h
...Range 2: 1524 - 1087.2h
...Range 3: 505 - 1087.2h
...Range 4: 25 - 52.9h
...Range 5: 0
...Range 6: 0

Keeping in mind this was from about 10k miles ago so presumably the hrs since Range 4 is longer than the 52.9h stated.

Thoughts? (besides doing another report)
Old 12-05-2020, 06:47 PM
  #2  
Tkersting
Advanced
 
Tkersting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 62
Received 37 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Honestly a report from 2.5 years ago isn’t helpful to you. Looks like one bad shift on that report, if it’s 10k miles ago that shift should be fine. What happened since then is the most important info. Get the DME and a full PPI if the car fits your criteria.
Old 12-06-2020, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 26,015
Received 6,595 Likes on 4,193 Posts
Default

Yeah, that report is useless, except for the fact that you can now see how the owner you'll be buying the car from has driven it since you have a report from before his ownership and will have a current one (once you get it) to see what has changed.
Old 12-06-2020, 10:32 AM
  #4  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Thank you. I'm planning on getting a PPI. I am more asking if Range 4 over-revs should be a deal breaker?
Old 12-06-2020, 10:46 AM
  #5  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 26,015
Received 6,595 Likes on 4,193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrantyB
Thank you. I'm planning on getting a PPI. I am more asking if Range 4 over-revs should be a deal breaker?
Not from that long ago. We like to see 50-100 hours since a higher range overev event and you have way more than that.
Old 12-06-2020, 05:36 PM
  #6  
C4SDayton
Pro
 
C4SDayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 530
Received 57 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

The range 4 isn't real worrisome by itself being a low number and a long time ago. That's a lot of range 1 overevs relative to what is common. Has it seen significant track time or hard street use? People can say these cars are made for that all they'd like, but I'd still rather put the overevs on myself than buy a car someone else drove pretty hard, depending of course on your budget and whether the price reflects what you know about the car.
Old 12-07-2020, 11:02 AM
  #7  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Thank you for the feedback; and I though that the Range 1 seems a bit beyond "normal" as well. The current owner says he doesn't track the car, and doing the operating hrs & mileage math, the 1090hrs would be before he owned the car. The Range 4 was under his ownership.
Old 12-07-2020, 01:22 PM
  #8  
C4SDayton
Pro
 
C4SDayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 530
Received 57 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrantyB
Thank you for the feedback; and I though that the Range 1 seems a bit beyond "normal" as well. The current owner says he doesn't track the car, and doing the operating hrs & mileage math, the 1090hrs would be before he owned the car. The Range 4 was under his ownership.
I believe you are misreading the report, which was before the current owner had it. The range 4 revs occurred with 52.9 hours of engine run time, so early in first ownership. The last overrev occurred at 1090 hours, likely soon before the current owner bought the car. The total hours isn't on what you gave us but the range 4 occurred about 1040 hrs before the last range 1 occurred.
Old 12-07-2020, 04:39 PM
  #9  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Oh. I was under the impression the hrs listed was hours since event occurred; I guess I'm wrong. In that case you're correct that almost all the over-revs occurred under the previous owner, and that person looks like they tracked the car. The total operating hours on the report is 1837.
Old 12-07-2020, 04:43 PM
  #10  
roadie13
Burning Brakes
 
roadie13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 762
Received 230 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrantyB
Oh. I was under the impression the hrs listed was hours since event occurred; I guess I'm wrong. In that case you're correct that almost all the over-revs occurred under the previous owner, and that person looks like they tracked the car. The total operating hours on the report is 1837.
Yep, the incident hours is the running engine count since initialization of the DME (the birth of your car).

Another useful bit from the data is the average speed of the vehicle over its lifetime. Typical values are 30-35mph, I think. Much higher would have to be exclusive track time, much lower would be a lot of crawling traffic.
Old 12-07-2020, 09:51 PM
  #11  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Yeah, I knew that part. PPI mileage was 52200 with 1837hrs = 28mph, so fairly typical driving.
Old 12-08-2020, 09:07 PM
  #12  
qikqbn
Rennlist Member
 
qikqbn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,296
Received 540 Likes on 298 Posts
Default

low numbers in any range means the rpms just "kissed" or "brushed" the bottom of the range. We are talking milliseconds with low numbers. The longer or deeper the time spent in the range the more ignition counts. A small number in range 5 would not necessarily scare me either as long as they were 100+ hours since the last incident. Get the latest and greatest report and we can take another look to analyze
Old 12-09-2020, 11:12 PM
  #13  
BrantyB
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BrantyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 142
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Thank you for all your thoughts, it was helpful to me to get others' perspective. I decided to pass on the car; after thinking about it more just didn't feel right to me.



Quick Reply: Looking for opinion on Rev Report



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:21 PM.