Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

$50k budget...997.1 S or c4s vs CPO m3/4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2018, 11:12 AM
  #31  
ETL330
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ETL330's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 48
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oneday997


weather is bad this weekend, but if we can figure out a time when it dries out, I’d be happy to give you a tour of mine and let you take it for a spin. I live up in the Erie area. PM me and we can work it out.
thank you! That’s a very nice offer. It looks like stevinson has one coming into inventory so I may check that out even if it’s not exactly what I’d want.

Originally Posted by shekmark
Good luck with your car hunting. Just an observation. The all wheel drive is really not about winter. Especially for me, since I love to drive this car every day, all wheel drive is is about wet traction. This C4S is awesome in the rain! Very confidence inspiring. I do put winter tires on, but thats just about the temperature, not snow. Below 50 degrees is not ideal for summer hi performance tires. I drive all winter long as long as there is no salt. That means it sits in the garage for long spells until a good rain comes to wash the salt away.
Yeah I definitely like the 4S, but it’s a bit out of budget in .2 trim sadly.

what do you all think about mileage? Should I have a cutoff point? It seems to get a .2 under 50k I’ll have to go for one with a couple more miles
Old 10-06-2018, 12:12 PM
  #32  
shekmark
Pro
 
shekmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Manasquan, NJ
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ETL330


thank you! That’s a very nice offer. It looks like stevinson has one coming into inventory so I may check that out even if it’s not exactly what I’d want.



Yeah I definitely like the 4S, but it’s a bit out of budget in .2 trim sadly.

what do you all think about mileage? Should I have a cutoff point? It seems to get a .2 under 50k I’ll have to go for one with a couple more miles
Want a cabriolet? Come buy mine with CPO one year left, for 50K Drive it home!!!
Old 10-07-2018, 02:57 AM
  #33  
fat_louis
Advanced
 
fat_louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Are you set on a 911? A used 718 Boxster/Cayman can be had with turbo so you won't have to worry about losing any power at altitude (not sure a 345-385 HP car will lose that much power that you will notice anyway--the ECU will compensate). Supposedly they are dynamically superior cars, but to me a Porsche is not a Porsche unless it is a 911. I am a former dyed in the wool BMW M3 enthusiast. I was recently performing the same calculus as you between a 997.2 911 GTS and a BMW M4. The Porsche costs more but it has less depreciation downside IMO. I thought it was blasphemy that they changed the M3 Coupe into the M4. They should have kept it M3 and just made the distinguishing factor coupe or sedan. BMW definitely lost its way in a lot of ways, but they are still decent cars albeit not very exclusive ones any more. You should just get a porsche. It will make you feel like a distinguished gentleman and a member of an exclusive yet still somewhat accessible club.
Old 10-13-2018, 07:55 PM
  #34  
rap
Racer
 
rap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Luzerne county, Pennsylvania
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My mechanic told me pre 2009 911’s gave him a lot of business but 2009 forward we’re bankrupting him because they don’t break. I just got a 2009 Targa 4s under circumstances that would cause most here to call me a fool. When I got it home after a 10 hour trip I had a soup to nuts maintenance and assessment done. Luckily for me a clean bill of health. First 911 and have several 968’s including a track car. I love the car. Be patient and go for it.
Old 10-13-2018, 08:20 PM
  #35  
porscheconvert
Racer
 
porscheconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 352
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hot sports opinion. This forum is crazy obsessed with 997.2...and I think it’s ridiculous. I’ve had both and currently drive a .1. .2 is slightly better, but not 8-10k better...which is what the market seems to be bearing. .1 feels a bit more raw to me and power is negligible for every day driving.

For 10k in savings, buy a tech stock that’s been hammered last 30 days and within a few years you’ll have enough saved for catastrophic engine failure replace. Ha!

Drive em both and then you’ll know.
Old 10-13-2018, 08:24 PM
  #36  
LISsailor
Pro
 
LISsailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 640
Received 191 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porscheconvert
Hot sports opinion. This forum is crazy obsessed with 997.2...and I think it’s ridiculous. I’ve had both and currently drive a .1. .2 is slightly better, but not 8-10k better...which is what the market seems to be bearing. .1 feels a bit more raw to me and power is negligible for every day driving.

For 10k in savings, buy a tech stock that’s been hammered last 30 days and within a few years you’ll have enough saved for catastrophic engine failure replace. Ha!

Drive em both and then you’ll know.
I knew I could afford the more expensive .2, and I also knew I could not afford a rebuild on a .1. For me, the $10k delta was a no-brainer.
Old 10-13-2018, 09:15 PM
  #37  
porscheconvert
Racer
 
porscheconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 352
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

LIS - risk is in the eye of the beholder...to each their own. From my purview, neither of these Porsche cars are risky...if you stare at the math.

To the OP:

bmw $50k. 50k miles from now car is worth 15 - 20k. thousands in repairs.
997.1 $45k. 50k miles from now car is worth 35k. Not thousands in repairs.

Even if my car blows up (which is a ridiculous what if), my 997.1 math still wins. $5k in market per year is almost $10k in about 5 or 6 years as a passive investor.

Old 10-14-2018, 12:52 AM
  #38  
ETL330
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ETL330's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 48
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone have any thoughts on this car?
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...5859/overview/
Old 10-14-2018, 12:56 AM
  #39  
armanslr
Rennlist Member
 
armanslr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Southern California
Posts: 474
Received 173 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ETL330
Anyone have any thoughts on this car?
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...5859/overview/
If I was spending 40k+ on a 996 I’d be a 40 Jahre.
Old 10-14-2018, 01:01 AM
  #40  
porscheconvert
Racer
 
porscheconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 352
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

X51 very rare and needed for 4s in my opinion. Atlas was my first 997.1....love that color. Also very rare.

This car car is priced pretty well given msrp and extra power. I would shoot for 47.5 and give yourself extra few grand for new wheels. Mileage about right for 06.

Do a PPI and do it quickly...x51s don’t last long.
Old 10-14-2018, 02:02 AM
  #41  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,455
Received 1,008 Likes on 716 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porscheconvert
LIS - risk is in the eye of the beholder...to each their own. From my purview, neither of these Porsche cars are risky...if you stare at the math.

To the OP:

bmw $50k. 50k miles from now car is worth 15 - 20k. thousands in repairs.
997.1 $45k. 50k miles from now car is worth 35k. Not thousands in repairs.

Even if my car blows up (which is a ridiculous what if), my 997.1 math still wins.
$5k in market per year is almost $10k in about 5 or 6 years as a passive investor.
This is where and how the .2 premium is created. No guarantee of "not thousands in repairs" and no guarantee of the car not blowing up. The chance of IMS failure or bore scoring on the .1 cars is minuscule but threads pop up now and then with actual stories of it happening. Add to that a lot of people with little or no financial risk tolerance and their decision is easy. As low as the odds are, the fact that a 997.1 can be reduced to a $7K to $8K roller in a matter of seconds due to design flaws is enough for many buyers to pass them up. For the record, I'm not one of those. Bought my -06 C4S fully aware of all this and had no worries whatsoever.
Old 10-14-2018, 11:46 AM
  #42  
porscheconvert
Racer
 
porscheconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 352
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sandwedge so why wouldnt someone just buy a warranty...still saving 5 grand? .2 still has similar rIsk of thousands in repairs....just read some dude had to replace his pdk and cost 14 grand.

Also read other day from a mechanic in the Bay Area had been there 15 years and never seen or heard of bore scoring incident at the shop.

Whatevs...now I get how the 996 community feels. Side note, would own one of those if I could stand the look. The 996 math equation makes my 997 decision look foolish.

Last edited by porscheconvert; 10-14-2018 at 12:08 PM.
Old 10-14-2018, 12:19 PM
  #43  
Fined
Three Wheelin'
 
Fined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,650
Received 206 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

Thread derails into 997.1 vs 997.2, predictably.

Long term.. the market will make clear which cars are a better and smarter buy. That's pretty much already happened, so the argument is merely academic at this point.
Old 10-14-2018, 12:24 PM
  #44  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,308
Received 6,166 Likes on 3,930 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porscheconvert


Whatevs...now I get how the 996 community feels. Side note, would own one of those if I could stand the look. The 996 math equation makes my 997 decision look foolish.
Though the 996 and 997.1 are mechanically similar, if talking about an M97 S engine, they're not the same. Different timing chain setup (5 chain vs 3 chain), Variocam vs Variocam plus (lift & duration), also interior design and materials, and exterior design, etc.

Personally, I love the look of the 997s, but wouldn't feel the same about a 996 with the walk away and look back, or while looking around the inside during a drive.
Old 10-14-2018, 01:02 PM
  #45  
ETL330
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ETL330's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 48
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What’s the major failure on the .1? The IMS bearing? Finally have a slow day to do some reading today


Quick Reply: $50k budget...997.1 S or c4s vs CPO m3/4



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:51 PM.