Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First time 911 owner: C2 or C4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2018, 03:39 PM
  #16  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,120
Received 1,248 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

One of the common misconceptions regarding AWD Porsche 911s is that they were designed for better traction during inclement weather conditions. While this can be true in some instances, the real purpose of the design was to allow the driver to apply engine power more quickly when exiting a corner.

Any 911 will do well in rain or snow when equipped with proper tires and when driven appropriately. Additionally, the vast majority of people can’t tell the difference in a RWD 911 and an AWD 911 when driven on the street. How often do you get a car sideways when driving to work? On the track, this is obviously not the case.

I don’t think that AWD takes away from the “911 experience” for most people. Like many, I think the wide body cars look better.

Ultimately, you have to prioritize the features and driving attributes that you prefer. If you prefer the looks of the wide body cars, and you will mostly drive on the street, then get a C4 or C4S. If you want to have the ability to get sideways and have fun on the track every now and again, then get the C2 or C2S.

I don't think that weather should be a major factor in the decision.
Old 07-07-2018, 05:33 PM
  #17  
rootwyrm
Instructor
 
rootwyrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So may as well chime in with my $0.02 since I'm in the same boat somewhat. First timer, 997.2, wrestled with the C2 vs C4 debate at length. More importantly: I'm intimately familiar with what you're used to. My toys are lightweight, high power FWD. (Though I'm more JCW than S.) So I speak your language fluently.

Porsche AWD is not like your typical road car AWD system. Front push-back is pretty minimal. It ain't no Subaru. Both cars are going to require you to change you style and habits significantly. The wider rear, however, will mimic the "danger" hop you know from FWDs going over rough pavement with the stiffer suspensions. (The best way to experience is to find yourself a RWD GTS and set it in Sport.) It can be extremely unsettling, but it's not an indicator of traction loss like it is in FWD. That can be true for C4 as well depending on options, and probably the biggest difference you'll have to acclimate to. (Yes, yes, I know, I know. We're talking FWD though.) A few hours with a front-rear isn't going to change your muscle memory when you're daily driving the Mini. You're going to have to relearn throttle patterns, and acclimate to a very different set of habits, but the 997.2 is a very driver-friendly car in that regard.

Neither car is "safer" than the other though - just ask my insurance. C2 premium is the same as C4. The number of driven wheels don't really impact the habits of the chassis, both good and bad. It just changes the delivery. My honest advice as a fellow first timer is to pass on what my Porsche guy told me: drive as many different 997.2's as you can, and just go with the one you like best, because they're all great. The one thing I would add though is, don't fall in love with the GTS - they're too damn hard to find.
Old 07-07-2018, 06:08 PM
  #18  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,716
Received 1,580 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Either one, makes little difference. Even if you turn off all nannies in a C2, you will still have to try really hard to get into trouble. I would not think much about C2 vs C4 and just find the right car, as there are many other important factors.
Old 07-07-2018, 06:28 PM
  #19  
johzev
Rennlist Member
 
johzev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have always been a die hard rear wheel drive person. Until recently found myself driving C4S. My car is driven year around through Michigan winters. Traction on snow and ice is outstanding. Because of balance between front drive and rear drive, you would never know the front wheels are engaged. C4 is the way to go if you live in an area with occasional snow and ice. Although due to low clearance, no good in accumulated snow. Four inches or more.
Old 07-07-2018, 08:15 PM
  #20  
Fined
Three Wheelin'
 
Fined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,650
Received 206 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

For a first 911 it was important to me to get a RWD. I had just had an AWD sports coupe before that and wanted nothing to do with AWD. Still don't really.
Old 07-07-2018, 08:44 PM
  #21  
Meursault88
Burning Brakes
 
Meursault88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johzev
Have always been a die hard rear wheel drive person. Until recently found myself driving C4S. My car is driven year around through Michigan winters. Traction on snow and ice is outstanding. Because of balance between front drive and rear drive, you would never know the front wheels are engaged. C4 is the way to go if you live in an area with occasional snow and ice. Although due to low clearance, no good in accumulated snow. Four inches or more.
True that. I've had VWs with excellent AWD systems as long as the snow wasn't deep enough to high center the car. It's an embarrassing situation when you do it so badly that all 4 wheels are off the ground.
Old 07-07-2018, 08:51 PM
  #22  
Meursault88
Burning Brakes
 
Meursault88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oronymo
I live in the northwest (Seattle) where the weather is mild but often wet.
I bought a C4S because I consider that I am not a naturally good driver and wanted as much insurance (nanny) as I could get. It's an arguable point but some see a modern C4S is more of a car than a 959.

https://rennlist.com/forums/991/9929...ne-racing.html
Old 07-07-2018, 09:21 PM
  #23  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,456
Received 1,008 Likes on 716 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oronymo
I live in the northwest (Seattle) where the weather is mild but often wet. I'm replacing my modded Mini Cooper S with something like a 997 Porsche 911 (looking to move away from FWD and get something a lot more exciting).

In addition to occasional fun drives, I will need to also daily drive this on my short 5 mile commute into downtown Seattle.

Being new to RWD and the fact that I'll be driving this on non-ideal weather days, should I get a C4? Does the C4 take away the fun?


C4 Pros:
- Safer?
- Wider body (nicer style)

C2 Pros:
- More fun?
- Less expensive (might even be able to get C2s for same price as C4)

BTW, I've driven both and found them equally exciting to drive on a short test drive. I didn't get a chance to try to really push it or get it sideways with the dealer riding shotgun.
Florida weather during the summer months is similar to NW weather. Lots of rain except we sometimes get long periods of dry weather. The two 997 C4S's I've had so far have given a lot of confidence on rain soaked roads but I'm quick to add a qualifier to that. They need good rubber to deliver that stability. The issue I've run into a couple of times is that the rear tires seem to ride with most of its weight on the inner 2-3 inches and that wear is hard to see unless you get on the ground. I've had rear tires that looked almost new when viewed standing next to them but were worn to where the cord was visible on those 2-3 inch inside once you got a better look.

The way you find out is after a long dry spell and then a real down pour. All that stuck to the ground feeling is gone all of a sudden and the rear starts to dance around almost like you're driving on ice. Another clue is that the rears start to get really noisy when worn to that level. I'm guessing the RWD 997's will behave the same way. Haven't taken my GTS that far yet,
Old 07-07-2018, 11:53 PM
  #24  
Marv
Rennlist Member
 
Marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 4,137
Received 997 Likes on 530 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
It seems that you need some DE training. With a good driver any car can be safe
+1

Also, good tires and correct inflation make a significant difference. I run a GT3 rain and shine and have no issues. The GT3 has no electronic gimmicks to correct bad driving. Anything that goes wrong is purely the driver's fault. Modern 911s have dialed out the legendary gremlins of the past.
Old 07-08-2018, 12:01 AM
  #25  
Marv
Rennlist Member
 
Marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 4,137
Received 997 Likes on 530 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sandwedge
The issue I've run into a couple of times is that the rear tires seem to ride with most of its weight on the inner 2-3 inches ...
That's normal as Porsche tends to set the camber so that the wheel leans in a slight bit for better cornering.
Old 07-08-2018, 02:02 AM
  #26  
j beede
Racer
 
j beede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sandwedge
Florida weather during the summer months is similar to NW weather. Lots of rain except we sometimes get long periods of dry weather. The two 997 C4S's I've had so far have given a lot of confidence on rain soaked roads but I'm quick to add a qualifier to that. They need good rubber to deliver that stability. The issue I've run into a couple of times is that the rear tires seem to ride with most of its weight on the inner 2-3 inches and that wear is hard to see unless you get on the ground. I've had rear tires that looked almost new when viewed standing next to them but were worn to where the cord was visible on those 2-3 inch inside once you got a better look.

The way you find out is after a long dry spell and then a real down pour. All that stuck to the ground feeling is gone all of a sudden and the rear starts to dance around almost like you're driving on ice. Another clue is that the rears start to get really noisy when worn to that level. I'm guessing the RWD 997's will behave the same way. Haven't taken my GTS that far yet,
Yes. The asymmetrical wear caught me by surprise when I first experienced it. I took a set of P-Zero well past 8,000 miles and in a moderately heavy rain the rear hydroplaning made it feel like I was driving on Teflon. A tire-friendlier rear alignment would make sense if you don't track your car.
Old 07-08-2018, 08:32 PM
  #27  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,456
Received 1,008 Likes on 716 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marv
That's normal as Porsche tends to set the camber so that the wheel leans in a slight bit for better cornering.
I know that. What I wasn't aware of was how much lowering the car aggravates this configuration. Even the techs at my dealer said that no matter how much they dial out the camber and toe settings to compensate I'll be lucky to get much above 10,000 miles out of the rear tires with H&R springs or coilovers with the same amount of lowering. They've been spot on right so far with two cars set up the same way. Some guys with bone stock cars claim to get up to 20,000 miles on the rear tires and maybe they do with gentle driving.

Originally Posted by j beede
Yes. The asymmetrical wear caught me by surprise when I first experienced it. I took a set of P-Zero well past 8,000 miles and in a moderately heavy rain the rear hydroplaning made it feel like I was driving on Teflon. A tire-friendlier rear alignment would make sense if you don't track your car.
See comments above. If you're lowered, it's tough to get much past 10,000 miles on the rears without getting into what you (and I and many others) got into even with the most conservative camber/toe/alignment configuration. I put just over 40,000 miles on my -09 C4S lowered with H&R springs with the suspension configuration mentioned above. Still went through 4 sets of rear tires and two sets of fronts. Not a track car but driven enthusiastically.



Quick Reply: First time 911 owner: C2 or C4?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:53 PM.