987 vs 997
#16
ROFL at comment about tracking 997's
I tracked my 997.2 - Was a GREAT CAR.
Never overheats - never had brake fade to extent of any real concern - limiting factor always been the tires and me as a driver .
I've moved on to the 991.1 - Far superior platform all around.
The 997 platform is still good (far more forgiving than a c6 corvette z06).
BS comment about advance track days -
See 997 thread
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...rack-days.html
I tracked my 997.2 - Was a GREAT CAR.
Never overheats - never had brake fade to extent of any real concern - limiting factor always been the tires and me as a driver .
I've moved on to the 991.1 - Far superior platform all around.
The 997 platform is still good (far more forgiving than a c6 corvette z06).
BS comment about advance track days -
See 997 thread
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...rack-days.html
#17
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
When I was shopping for a P-car, I was facing the same issue. HOWEVER, I thought if I bought the Cayman I may have had an occasional 'should I have got the 911?' question in my head.
I bought the 911, and I've never asked myself 'Should I have got the Cayman instead?'
Happy hunting!
I bought the 911, and I've never asked myself 'Should I have got the Cayman instead?'
Happy hunting!
Hands down that will be me :/
cayman platform is easily superior to the 911. Additionally, if you intend on really beating the car or tracking it, I'd much rather have a 987.2 cayman vs. a 997.1 911. The m96/m97 is junk from top to bottom.
I have 2 911s and 1 early boxster, and I'm convinced that the boxster is the better performance car platform.
I have 2 911s and 1 early boxster, and I'm convinced that the boxster is the better performance car platform.
"cayman platform is easily superior to the 911. Additionally, if you intend on really beating the car or tracking it, I'd much rather have a 987.2 cayman vs. a 997.1 911. The m96/m97 is junk from top to bottom"
He is not going to track his car. Also please be careful with slogan. I would'n call M97 with more then 250 track days without a single glitch a junk. Cayman R is easier to drive then 997 but this is not the point. Some people like more engaging and problem solving/tuning.
He is not going to track his car. Also please be careful with slogan. I would'n call M97 with more then 250 track days without a single glitch a junk. Cayman R is easier to drive then 997 but this is not the point. Some people like more engaging and problem solving/tuning.
And no tracking for the Porsche, as mentioned above I have a Caterham I track occasionally, whenever it feels like working properly.
I'm also new to Porsche ownership, mine being my 6th entry to my four wheel stable. I'm a pedals over paddles guy. Yea, I see the numbers and the newest PDK can shift faster and the ultimate 0 - 100 is quicker than with the manual transmission. I just prefer the overall driving experience from my antiquated old school clutch and gated shifter (years ago I REALLY wanted a 911 with the sequential transmission). I really like my '05 997 C2. Sure it has some things I would rather not have things like a sunroof and I have always felt that electric seats were a waste of money, plus adds unnecessary weight to the car, and it lacks a AUX connector that will cost about $150 to put in.
I'm very happy with my choice and enjoy driving it.
And yes, I'm looking forward to getting it out on track for a HPDE event soon.
Mien Stuttgart Reinauto
I'm very happy with my choice and enjoy driving it.
And yes, I'm looking forward to getting it out on track for a HPDE event soon.
Mien Stuttgart Reinauto
Nope, I agree...the 911 will always be the classic. The Cayman COULD have been a classic if Porsche stuck to a mid-engine layout since the 914.
#18
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
ROFL at comment about tracking 997's
I tracked my 997.2 - Was a GREAT CAR.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tApRniuGUw
Never overheats - never had brake fade to extent of any real concern - limiting factor always been the tires and me as a driver .
I've moved on to the 991.1 - Far superior platform all around.
The 997 platform is still good (far more forgiving than a c6 corvette z06).
BS comment about advance track days -
See 997 thread
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...rack-days.html
I tracked my 997.2 - Was a GREAT CAR.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tApRniuGUw
Never overheats - never had brake fade to extent of any real concern - limiting factor always been the tires and me as a driver .
I've moved on to the 991.1 - Far superior platform all around.
The 997 platform is still good (far more forgiving than a c6 corvette z06).
BS comment about advance track days -
See 997 thread
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...rack-days.html
Digging the black 997.1 in front of you. Tires are always the limiting factor on any track car. I occasionally take my M4 Competition Package to the track and currently run PS4's on it and so far no complaints. I have carbon brakes on the car so definitely no brake fade, but can't imagine the steelies on the 997 to fade out either.
Thanks for the thread link btw.
#19
Either car would be a great choice, but it boils down to this.... Will you be happy with a Cayman or will you always be thinking that what you really wanted was a 911.
You posted this question on a 911 forum so you can probably guess how most people here would answer the question.
You posted this question on a 911 forum so you can probably guess how most people here would answer the question.
#20
Nordschleife Master
No one should get a 911 when searching for the best balanced car. Get a mid-engine if you seek that. For the 911 fan it's its quirky dynamics that make it unique; either you understand and like that, or not. Driven properly, the 911 is perfectly balanced - emphasis on properly driven - and do not take my word for it, listen to the 911 master:
The following users liked this post:
SyG21 (06-02-2024)
#21
I bought a 2006 Boxster S in April 2015. I really wanted a 911, but didn't want to spend the money. The 987 was awesome - manual sport seats, sport shifter, sport chrono, PASM, sport steering wheel (basically everything but PSE). Great car.
The problem was is that I bought it because I didn't want to spend the money required to get a 911.
I sold the 987 in April 2016. I bought a 2006 C2S in July 2016 (took awhile to find a good, clean, Guards Red car with the right options).
Long story short, don't buy the 987 if it feels like you're settling. You'll always be disappointed, and that's not a great way to feel about your Porsche.
However, if I could buy my Boxster back I would. I'd love to have a mid-engined roadster and the 911 in the garage. Boxster was an awesome car. I wouldn't say the 911 is better. Different, but not necessarily better.
The problem was is that I bought it because I didn't want to spend the money required to get a 911.
I sold the 987 in April 2016. I bought a 2006 C2S in July 2016 (took awhile to find a good, clean, Guards Red car with the right options).
Long story short, don't buy the 987 if it feels like you're settling. You'll always be disappointed, and that's not a great way to feel about your Porsche.
However, if I could buy my Boxster back I would. I'd love to have a mid-engined roadster and the 911 in the garage. Boxster was an awesome car. I wouldn't say the 911 is better. Different, but not necessarily better.
The following users liked this post:
Hillsberger (05-17-2023)
#22
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 904 Likes
on
532 Posts
Owned at least 20+, perhaps 30ish, 911s throughout the years of all types and varieties. Even purchased a CGT new, but have never owned a Boxter or a Cayman. Driven plenty of them, but never once purchased one or got serious about purchasing one.
#23
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Either car would be a great choice, but it boils down to this.... Will you be happy with a Cayman or will you always be thinking that what you really wanted was a 911.
You posted this question on a 911 forum so you can probably guess how most people here would answer the question.
You posted this question on a 911 forum so you can probably guess how most people here would answer the question.
No one should get a 911 when searching for the best balanced car. Get a mid-engine if you seek that. For the 911 fan it's its quirky dynamics that make it unique; either you understand and like that, or not. Driven properly, the 911 is perfectly balanced - emphasis on properly driven - and do not take my word for it, listen to the 911 master:
https://youtu.be/eb416XlcojU
https://youtu.be/eb416XlcojU
I bought a 2006 Boxster S in April 2015. I really wanted a 911, but didn't want to spend the money. The 987 was awesome - manual sport seats, sport shifter, sport chrono, PASM, sport steering wheel (basically everything but PSE). Great car.
The problem was is that I bought it because I didn't want to spend the money required to get a 911.
I sold the 987 in April 2016. I bought a 2006 C2S in July 2016 (took awhile to find a good, clean, Guards Red car with the right options).
Long story short, don't buy the 987 if it feels like you're settling. You'll always be disappointed, and that's not a great way to feel about your Porsche.
However, if I could buy my Boxster back I would. I'd love to have a mid-engined roadster and the 911 in the garage. Boxster was an awesome car. I wouldn't say the 911 is better. Different, but not necessarily better.
The problem was is that I bought it because I didn't want to spend the money required to get a 911.
I sold the 987 in April 2016. I bought a 2006 C2S in July 2016 (took awhile to find a good, clean, Guards Red car with the right options).
Long story short, don't buy the 987 if it feels like you're settling. You'll always be disappointed, and that's not a great way to feel about your Porsche.
However, if I could buy my Boxster back I would. I'd love to have a mid-engined roadster and the 911 in the garage. Boxster was an awesome car. I wouldn't say the 911 is better. Different, but not necessarily better.
I recently checked out an insanely specced 2008 Cayman S with 15k miles, now sold. But it had a $92k sticker price. Every option possible, aero kit, Sport Chrono, PASM, extended seats, guards red dials, chrono gauge, seat belts, painted trim/headlight washers, lobster wheels painted black, etc.. Car was listed at $38k. For that price I could be in a well sorted 997 C2S, not AS highly optioned, but still.
Wow! Take it from a CGT owner! In 2014 I bought an '07 LP640 with the gated manual, maybe 29 in the country if not worldwide...yet the Cayman was still an option
#24
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Okay okay, so now that that's settled....C2 or C2S?
To be honest that's probably the biggest dilemma for me...I've driven both, they're both great. Any reason to lean towards the non-S over the S? (or vice versa)
Options matter over miles for me. Ideally it would have Sport Chrono, PASM, extended seats, and nicer wheels.
To be honest that's probably the biggest dilemma for me...I've driven both, they're both great. Any reason to lean towards the non-S over the S? (or vice versa)
Options matter over miles for me. Ideally it would have Sport Chrono, PASM, extended seats, and nicer wheels.
#25
Race Director
"cayman platform is easily superior to the 911. Additionally, if you intend on really beating the car or tracking it, I'd much rather have a 987.2 cayman vs. a 997.1 911. The m96/m97 is junk from top to bottom"
He is not going to track his car. Also please be careful with slogan. I would'n call M97 with more then 250 track days without a single glitch a junk. Cayman R is easier to drive then 997 but this is not the point. Some people like more engaging and problem solving/tuning.
He is not going to track his car. Also please be careful with slogan. I would'n call M97 with more then 250 track days without a single glitch a junk. Cayman R is easier to drive then 997 but this is not the point. Some people like more engaging and problem solving/tuning.
2ndly, the 911 is not more engaging, its just harder to drive well. most people arent good enough to maximize the 987 chassis, much less a 911
#27
I've had my current 997.1 for just over a year and love it. Prior to this, I had a Cayman S for 1.5 years. Unlike the majority of the people in this forum, I preferred driving the Cayman over the 911.
Drive both and try not to let those "it has to be a 911 or it's not a real Porsche" people influence your decision.
Good luck
Drive both and try not to let those "it has to be a 911 or it's not a real Porsche" people influence your decision.
Good luck
#28
Rennlist Member
987 nice. I started looking there but wound up in 997 as it roomier, more interesting to drive and looked better. At 6"4 a cayman was too tight.
911 is a fine track car too.
I
911 is a fine track car too.
I
#29
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I've had my current 997.1 for just over a year and love it. Prior to this, I had a Cayman S for 1.5 years. Unlike the majority of the people in this forum, I preferred driving the Cayman over the 911.
Drive both and try not to let those "it has to be a 911 or it's not a real Porsche" people influence your decision.
Good luck
Drive both and try not to let those "it has to be a 911 or it's not a real Porsche" people influence your decision.
Good luck
I'm curious though, why do you say you enjoy the Cayman S over the 997? I've driven countless variants of the 997 as well as both gens of the Cayman (both the 2.7 and 3.4) and can't really get out of the car saying "boy, I'd rather drive this over the other". The 911 definitely has it's legacy and looks, and the Cayman has it's balance and unique mid-engine layout (which I love, I've owned an Elise and an Evora...both of which were nightmares)
Speaking of which....WHY on earth is the Cayman so relatively inexpensive compared to the dinky Elise?? I can call it dinky because I've owned one and experienced the horror of it firsthand
#30
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 904 Likes
on
532 Posts
Jeff, thanks for your input! Definitely agree - I hate the stigma of "if it's not a 911 it's not a Porsche" myself, which I experienced firsthand with my very first Porsche, a 1974 914...probably the second most knocked on Porsche next to the 924
I'm curious though, why do you say you enjoy the Cayman S over the 997? I've driven countless variants of the 997 as well as both gens of the Cayman (both the 2.7 and 3.4) and can't really get out of the car saying "boy, I'd rather drive this over the other". The 911 definitely has it's legacy and looks, and the Cayman has it's balance and unique mid-engine layout (which I love, I've owned an Elise and an Evora...both of which were nightmares)
Speaking of which....WHY on earth is the Cayman so relatively inexpensive compared to the dinky Elise?? I can call it dinky because I've owned one and experienced the horror of it firsthand
I'm curious though, why do you say you enjoy the Cayman S over the 997? I've driven countless variants of the 997 as well as both gens of the Cayman (both the 2.7 and 3.4) and can't really get out of the car saying "boy, I'd rather drive this over the other". The 911 definitely has it's legacy and looks, and the Cayman has it's balance and unique mid-engine layout (which I love, I've owned an Elise and an Evora...both of which were nightmares)
Speaking of which....WHY on earth is the Cayman so relatively inexpensive compared to the dinky Elise?? I can call it dinky because I've owned one and experienced the horror of it firsthand
I killed 3 transmissions (2nd gear synchros) and blew the heck out of an engine on the highway. The Lotus rep in Atlanta with the Australian sounding accent, cannot remember his name, hated me.
The 911 has plenty and handles just fine for the street. Cannot imagine most would be approaching or can even drive at or near the limits of either car on track, much less the street. I teethed on club racing 911 SCs back in the mid 80s so the modern day 911s drive like a dream to me as does any car that you don't have to trail brake like a demon to get the fronts to turn in.
Last edited by Doug H; 08-31-2017 at 12:02 AM.